Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T05:26:02.436Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Bahamas in International Politics: Issues Arising for an Archipelago State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Vaughan A. Lewis*
Affiliation:
Institute of Social and Economic Research, University of the West Indies, Bridgetown, Barbados

Extract

The Commonwealth of the Bahama Islands entered the international system as a sovereign state on July 10, 1973. It did so by sponsorship, which is to say that as far as relations between the Bahamas and the imperial country (United Kingdom) are concerned, independence has been granted, rather than taken or seized, with a minimal amount of difficulty. The identification of various issue-areas related to the entry of the Commonwealth into the international system is one way of indicating the various components that have gone into making up the “national interest” of that country, at least in the perspective of the state's policy makers. More concretely, the peculiar problems arising from its character as an archipelago state with a relatively open economy, make the questions to be resolved before and immediately after independence perhaps more complex than those faced by the other independent states of the Commonwealth Caribbean that have acceded to full sovereignty in the last decade.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Journal of International Law (1972) Volume 66: 918-920.Google Scholar
American Journal of International Law (1970) Volume 64: 930-932, 1021-1023.Google Scholar
Bahamas, Commonwealth of (1972) “Independence for the Commonwealth of the Bahamas.” Presented to Parliament by the Prime Minister, October 18. Nassau: Cabinet Office.Google Scholar
Bahamas Report (1965) Report for the Years 1962 and 1963. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Banker, (1973) “List of off-shore banks.” 123 (May): 511518.Google Scholar
Beesley, J. A. (1971) Statement to First Committee of the General Assembly: December 4, 1970 in Canadian Yearbook of International Law.Google Scholar
Canadian Yearbook of International Law (1971) Statement released by the State Department of the United States.Google Scholar
Crassweller, R. (1972) The Caribbean Community: Changing Societies and U.S. Policy. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Dean, A. H. (1958) Statement before the Geneva Conference on the Law of the Sea. American Journal of International Law 52: 607628.Google Scholar
Deutsch, K. (1966) “External influences on the behavior of states,” pp. 516 in R. B. Farrell (ed.) Approaches to Comparative and International Politics. Evanston, III.: Northwestern Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Financial Times (1973) “Upswing predicted for the varying fortunes of Freeport.” (July 10): 23.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, G. (1959) “Some results of the Geneva Conference on the Law of the Sea.” Amer. J. of International Law 8: 73121.Google Scholar
Hodgson, R. and Alexander, L. (1972) Towards an Objective Analysis of Special Circumstances: Bays, Rivers, Coastal and Oceanic Archipelagos and Atolls. Kingston: University of Rhode Island Law of the Sea Institute.Google Scholar
Johnston, D. (1965) The International Law of Fisheries. New Haven, Conn.: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Leifer, M. and Nelson, D. (1973) “Conflict of interests in the Straits of Malacca.” International Affairs 49 (April): 190203.Google Scholar
Lewis, V. A. (1970) The Structure of Small State Behaviour in Contemporary International Politics. Ph.D. dissertation. Manchester University.Google Scholar
McDougal, M. and Burke, W. T. (1965) The Public Order of the Oceans. New Haven, Conn.: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
McLoughlin, D. (1972) “The approach by Fiji—a mid-ocean archipelago-to the Conference on the Law of the Sea.” Melanesian Law J. 1,3: 37-46.Google Scholar
Rosenau, J. [ed.] (1969) Linkage Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Rosenau, J. [ed.] (1966) “Pre-theories and theories of foreign policy,” in R. B. Farrell (ed.) Approaches to Comparative and International Politics. Evanston, III.: Northwestern Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Royal Commission on the Hawksbill Creek Agreement (1971) Report. (Chairman: Sir Hugh Wooding.)Google Scholar
Stewart, G. (1970) “Straight baseline for the Bahamas,” in H. Meyers (ed.) Some Problems of International Law in the Commonwealth Caribbean. Jamaica: University of the West Indies Department of Government.Google Scholar
UN General Assembly (1971) Report of the Special Committee on the Situation with Regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples. Twenty-Fifth Session Supplement. A/8023/Rev.I.N.Y.Google Scholar
West Indies and Caribbean Yearbook (1973) The Bahamas. London: Thomas Skinner.Google Scholar