Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T15:20:15.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The magnitude and direction of changes in age-specific at-risk-of-poverty rates: an analysis of patterns of poverty trends in Europe in the mid-2010s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2022

Ilari Ilmakunnas Open the ORCID record for Ilari Ilmakunnas [Opens in a new window]
Ilari Ilmakunnas*
Affiliation:
The Finnish Centre for Pensions, Helsinki, Finland INVEST Research Flagship Center, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
*
Email: ilari.ilmakunnas@etk.fi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The European Union’s at-risk-of-poverty threshold is set at 60 per cent of national median disposable equivalent income. Changes in median income therefore shift the threshold, which is likely to affect at-risk-of-poverty rates. This effect is likely to vary across population subgroups due to, for instance, connectedness to the labour market. This exploratory study investigates whether there are typical patterns related to changes in age-specific at-risk-of-poverty rates. The study uses European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions microdata and focusses on the development of poverty rates in 30 European countries in the mid-2010s. Results show that especially the old-age poverty rates followed patterns that were different from those of child or working-age poverty rates. There were differences between age groups regarding both the magnitude and direction of at-risk-of-poverty rates. Additionally, the association between changes in at-risk-of-poverty rates and changes in poverty thresholds, income and employment significantly differs between the older population and the two other age groups.

Keywords

Povertypoverty measurementEuropeEU-SILCage differences
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , March 2022 , pp. 71 - 91
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with Social Policy Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, T., Cantillon, B., Marlier, E., & Nolan, B. (2002). Social indicators: The EU and social inclusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bárcena-Martin, E., Blanco-Arana, C. M., & Perez-Moreno, S. (2018). Social transfers and child poverty in European Countries: Pro-poor targeting or pro-child targeting? Journal of Social Policy, 47(4), 739–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barr, N. (2012). Economics of the welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beckerman, W. (1979). Poverty and the impact of income maintenance programmes. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
Cantillon, B. (2011). The paradox of the social investment state: Growth, employment and poverty in the Lisbon era. Journal of European Social Policy, 21(5), 432–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decancq, K., Goedemé, T., Van Den Bosch, K., & Vanhille, J. (2013). The evolution of poverty in the Europe Union: Concepts, measurement and data. In Cantillon, B. & Vandenbroucke, F. (Eds.), Reconciling work and poverty reduction: How successful are European welfare states? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ebbinghaus, B. (2021). Inequalities and poverty risks in old age across Europe: The double-edged income effect of pension systems. Social Policy & Administration, 55(3), 440–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebbinghaus, B., Nelson, K., & Nieuwenhuis, R. (2019). Poverty in old age. In Greve, B. (Ed.), Routledge international handbook of poverty. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
European Commission. (2004). Joint report on social inclusion 2004. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
European Commission. (2015). The 2015 ageing report. Economic and budgetary projections for the 28 EU Member States (2013–2060). European Economy No. 3/2015. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
Eurostat. (2021). Employment rates by sex, age and citizenship (%). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/lfsq_ergan/default/table?lang=enGoogle Scholar
Goedemé, T. (2013). How much confidence can we have in EU-SILC? Complex sample designs and the standard error of the Europe 2020 poverty indicators. Social Indicators Research, 110(1), 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goedemé, T., Collado, D., & Meeusen, L. (2014). Mountains on the move: Recent trends in national and EU-wide income dynamics in old and new EU Member States. Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp. (ImPRovE Working Papers No 14/05).Google Scholar
Goedemé, T., Penne, T., Hufkens, T., Karakitsios, A., Bernát, A., Franziskus, A., Simonovits, B., Álvarez, E. C., Kanavitsa, E., Parcerisas, I. C., Romaní, J. R., Mäkinen, L., Matsaganis, M., Arlotti, M., Kopasz, M., Szivós, P., Ritakallio, V.-M., Kazepov, Y., Van Den Bosch, K. & Storms, B. (2019). What does it mean to live on the poverty threshold? Lessons from reference budgets. In Cantillon, Bea, Goedemé, T., & Hills, J. (Eds.), Decent incomes for all: Improving policies in Europe (pp. 13–33). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goedemé, T., & Rottiers, S. (2011). Poverty in the enlarged European Union. A discussion about definitions and reference groups. Sociology Compass, 5(1), 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gornick, J. C., & Jäntti, M. (2012). Child poverty in cross-national perspective: Lessons from the Luxembourg Income Study. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(3), 558–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guio, A.-C. (2005). Material Deprivation in the EU. Eurostat. (Statistics in Focus 21/2005).Google Scholar
Iacovou, M. (2017). Household structure, income poverty and subjective hardship. In Atkinson, A. B., Guio, A.-C., & Marlier, E. (Eds.), Monitoring social inclusion in Europe. 2017 edition (pp. 89–102). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
Jacques, O., & Noël, A. (2021). Targeting within universalism, Journal of European Social Policy, 31(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928720918973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, S. P. (2020). Perspectives on poverty in Europe. Following in Tony Atkinson’s footsteps. Italian Economic Journal, 6(1), 129–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kangas, O., & Palme, J. (2000). Does social policy matter? Poverty cycles in OECD countries. International Journal of Health Services, 30(2), 335–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kangas, O., & Ritakallio, V. (1998). Different methods–different results? Approaches to multidimensional poverty. In Andreß, H. (Ed.), Empirical Poverty Research in a Comparative Perspective (pp. 167–203). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Lelkes, O., Medgyesi, M., & Tóth, I. G. (2009). The factors affecting the risk of poverty and inequalities in income distribution. In Ward, T., Lelkes, O., Sutherland, H., & Tóth, I. G. (Eds.), European inequalities: Social inclusion and income distribution in the European Union (pp. 45–76). TÁRKI Social Research Institute Inc., Budapest.Google Scholar
Mack, A., Lange, B., & Ponomarenko, V. (2020). Harmonization of Income Data in EU-SILC. Update of GESIS Paper 2015/18. GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. (GESIS Papers No. 2020/05).Google Scholar
Marlier, E., Atkinson, A. B., Cantillon, B., & Nolan, B. (2007). The EU and social inclusion: Facing the challenges. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Marx, I., Vandenbroucke, P., & Verbist, G. (2012). Can higher employment levels bring down relative income poverty in the EU? Regression-based simulations of the Europe 2020 target. Journal of European Social Policy, 22(5), 472–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928712456577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, B., & Whelan, C. T. (2011). Poverty and deprivation in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD. (2014). Income Inequality Update—June 2014.Google Scholar
OECD. (2019). Pensions at a Glance 2019: OECD and G20 Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b6d3dcfc-enGoogle Scholar
Penne, T., Hufkens, T., Goedemé, T., & Storms, B. (2020). To what extent do welfare states compensate for the cost of children? The joint impact of taxes, benefits and public goods and services. Journal of European Social Policy, 30(1), 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penne, T., Parcerisas, I. C., Mäkinen, L., Storms, B., & Goedemé, T. (2016). Can reference budgets be used as a poverty line? Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy – University of Antwerp. (ImPRovE Discussion Paper No. 16/05).Google Scholar
Rowntree, S. (1901). Poverty: A study of town life. London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
Spicker, P. (2012). Why refer to poverty as a proportion of median income? Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 20(2), 163–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TÁRKI. (2010). Child poverty and child wellbeing in the European Union. Report prepared for the DG employment, social affairs and equal opportunities (unite E.2) of the European Commission. TÁRKI Social Research Institute Inc., Budapest.Google Scholar
Townsend, P. (1962). The meaning of poverty. The British Journal of Sociology, 13(3), 210–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Lancker, W., Ghysels, J., & Cantillon, B. (2015). The impact of child benefits on single mother poverty: Exploring the role of targeting in 15 European countries. International Journal of Social Welfare, 24(3), 210–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar