Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Argon plasma coagulation tonsillectomy versus coblation tonsillectomy: a comparison of efficacy and safety

  • R Loh (a1), L Stepan (a1), E Zhen (a2) and C-K L Shaw (a1) (a3)

Abstract

Background

Tonsillectomy is one of the most common otolaryngological procedures. Nonetheless, there is still no universally approved ‘gold standard’ technique.

Objective

To compare the safety and efficacy of argon plasma coagulation and coblation techniques in tonsillectomy.

Methods

A multi-institutional, retrospective cohort study was conducted, comprising 283 patients who underwent bilateral tonsillectomies performed by a single surgeon between 2014 and 2017. The outcome measures included: operative time, intra-operative blood loss, post-operative pain and post-operative haemorrhage.

Results

In the argon plasma coagulation group, mean operative time and post-operative haemorrhage rate were significantly reduced, p = 0.0006 and p = 0.003 respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of post-operative pain and intra-operative blood loss.

Conclusion

The argon plasma coagulation technique is easy, safe and efficacious. Argon plasma coagulation tonsillectomy seems cost-effective compared to coblation tonsillectomy: the single-use disposable electrode tip and wand used in this study cost AUD$76.50 and AUD$380 respectively. Argon plasma coagulation appears to be a favourable alternative to current modalities such as coblation.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Author for correspondence: Dr Rachel Loh, Shaw House, 37 Dequetteville Terrace, Kent Town, SA 5067, Australia E-mail: racheloh.wl@gmail.com

Footnotes

Hide All

Dr R Loh takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

Presented orally at the 17th ASEAN Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Congress, 16–18 November 2017, Yangon, Myanmar.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
1Bergler, W, Huber, K, Hammerschmitt, N, Hormann, K. Tonsillectomy with argon plasma coagulation (APC): evaluation of pain and haemorrhage. Laryngoscope 2001;111:1423–9
2Kwok, M, Subramaniyan, M, Rimmer, J, Karahalios, A. Post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage in Australia--a multivariable analysis of risk factors. Aust J Otolaryngol 2018;1:2
3Metcalfe, C, Muzaffar, J, Daultrey, C, Coulson, C. Coblation tonsillectomy: a systematic review and descriptive analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017;274:2637–47
4Wilson, Y, Merer, D, Moscatello, A. Comparison of three common tonsillectomy techniques: a prospective randomized, double-blinded clinical study. Laryngoscope 2009;119:162–70
5Mösges, R, Hellmich, M, Allekotte, S, Albrecht, K, Böhm, M. Haemorrhage rate after coblation tonsillectomy: a meta-analysis of published trials. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011;268:807–16
6Wei, J, Beatty, C, Gustafson, R. Evaluation of posttonsillectomy haemorrhage and risk factors. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;123:229–35
7Windfuhr, J, Chen, Y, Remmert, S. Haemorrhage following tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy in 15,218 patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;132:281–6
8Windfuhr, J, Schloendorff, G, Baburi, D, Kremer, B. Life-threatening posttonsillectomy haemorrhage. Laryngoscope 2008;118:1389–94
9Rakesh, S, Anand, T, Payal, G, Pranjal, K. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study of coblation versus dissection tonsillectomy in adult patients. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;64:290–4
10Bergler, W, Huber, K, Hammerschmitt, N, Hölzl, M, Hörmann, K. Tonsillectomy with the argon-plasma-coagulation-raspatorium - a prospective randomized single-blinded study [in German]. HNO 2000;48:135–41
11Skinner, L, Colreavy, M, Lang, E, O'Hare, B, Charles, D, Timon, C. Randomized controlled trial comparing argon plasma coagulation tonsillectomy with conventional techniques. J Laryngol Otol 2003;117:298301
12Ferri, E, Armato, E, Capuzzo, P. Argon plasma coagulation versus cold dissection tonsillectomy in adults: a clinical prospective randomized study. Am J Otolaryngol 2007;28:384–7
13Ferri, E, Armato, E. Argon plasma coagulation versus cold dissection in pediatric tonsillectomy. Am J Otolaryngol 2011;32:459–63
14American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health; Task Force on Pain in Infants, Children, and Adolescents. The assessment and management of acute pain in infants, children, and adolescents. Pediatrics 2001;108:793–7
15Revill, S, Robinson, J, Rosen, M, Hogg, M. The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain. Anaesthesia 1976;31:1191–8
16Breivik, H, Borchgrevink, P, Allen, S, Rosseland, L, Romundstad, L, Hals, EK et al. Assessment of pain. Br J Anaesth 2008;101:1724
17Boelen-van der Loo, W, Scheffer, E, Haan, R, Groot, C. Clinimetric evaluation of the pain observation scale for young children in children aged between 1 and 4 years after ear, nose, and throat surgery. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1999;20:222–7
18de Jong, A, Bremer, M, Schouten, M, Tuinebreijer, W, Faber, A. Reliability and validity of the pain observation scale for young children and the visual analogue scale in children with burns. Burns 2005;31:198204
19Chambers, C, Finley, A, McGrath, P, Walsh, T. The parents’ postoperative pain measure: replication and extension to 2–6-year-old children. Pain 2003;105:437–43
20Sarny, S, Ossimitz, G, Habermann, W, Stammberger, H. Haemorrhage following tonsil surgery: a multicenter prospective study. Laryngoscope 2011;121:2553–60
21Bowling, D. Argon beam coagulation for post-tonsillectomy haemostasis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;126:316–20
22Noon, A, Hargreaves, S. Increased post-operative haemorrhage seen in adult coblation tonsillectomy. J Laryngol Otol 2003;117:704–6
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Journal of Laryngology & Otology
  • ISSN: 0022-2151
  • EISSN: 1748-5460
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-laryngology-and-otology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed