Skip to main content

Autologous incus versus titanium partial ossicular replacement prosthesis in reconstruction of Austin type A ossicular defects: a prospective randomised clinical trial

  • Naragund Amith (a1) and Mudhol RS (a1)
Abstract Objective:

This study aimed to compare the functional and anatomical outcomes of ossiculoplasty using an autograft incus or a titanium partial ossicular replacement prosthesis for reconstructing Austin type A ossicular defects.


Patients with Austin A ossicular defects were randomly divided into two groups: one group underwent ossiculoplasty with an autologous incus (the autologous incus group) and the other underwent ossiculoplasty with a titanium partial ossicular replacement prosthesis (the titanium prosthesis group). Otoscopic examination and audiological assessment was done pre-operatively and at 3, 6 and 12 months post-operatively.


A post-operative average air–bone gap closure of less than 20 dB was seen in 13 patients (65 per cent) in the autologous incus group and 7 (35 per cent) in the titanium prosthesis group. There were fewer post-operative complications in the autologous incus group (20 per cent) than in the titanium prosthesis group (45 per cent).


Hearing outcomes and graft take up after ossiculoplasty were significantly better when an autologous incus rather than a titanium partial ossicular replacement prosthesis was used to reconstruct Austin type A ossicular defects. The major disadvantages of the titanium prosthesis were unpredictable results and more post-operative complications.

Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Dr A Naragund, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, KLE University, Belagavi, Karnataka, India E-mail:
Hide All

Presented as a poster at the 16th International Otology Course, 26–28 June 2014, Clinique Jean Causse, Beziers, France

Hide All
1 Austin DF. Ossicular reconstruction. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1972;1:145–60
2 Iurato S, Marioni G, Onofri M. Hearing results of ossiculoplasty in Austin-Kartush group A patients. Otol Neurotol 2001;22:140–4
3 Yung M, Smith P. Titanium versus nontitanium ossicular prosthesis: a randomised controlled study of medium term outcome. Otol Neurotol 2010;1:752–8
4 O'Reilly RC, Cass SP, Hirsch BE, Kamerer DB, Bernat RA, Poznanovic SP. Ossiculoplasty using incus interposition: hearing results and analysis of the middle ear risk index. Otol Neurotol 2005;1:853–8
5 Martin A D, Harner S G. Ossicular reconstruction with titanium prosthesis. Laryngoscope 2004;1:61–4
6 Mahadevaiah A. Ossiculoplasty. In: Surgical techniques in chronic otitis media and otosclerosis: text and atlas, 1st edn. New Delhi: CBS, 2008;92111
7 Sanna M. Ossiculoplasty. In: Haberman RS, ed. Middle ear and mastoid surgery. New York: Thieme, 2003;176–86
8 Black B. Reporting results in ossiculoplasty. Otol Neurotol 2003;24:534–42
9 Telian S, Schmalbach C. Chronic otitis media. In: Snow JB Jr, Ballenger JJ, eds. Ballanger's Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 16th edn. Hamilton: BC Decker, 2003;280–2
10 Iñiquez Cuadra R, Alobid I, Bores Domenech A, Menedez Colino LM, Caballero M, Bernal Sprekelsen M. Type III tympanoplasty with titanium TORP: anatomical and functional results. Otol Neurotol 2010;1:409–14
11 Ceccato SB, Maunsell R, Morata GC, Portmann D. Comparative results of type II ossiculoplasty: incus transposition versus titanium PORP (Kurz). Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 2005;1:175–9
12 Naragund Amith, Mudhol RS, Harugop AS, Patil PH. Ossiculoplasty with autologous incus versus titanium prosthesis: a comparison of anatomical and functional results. Indian J Otol 2011;1:75–9
13 Kim HH, Battista RA, Kumar A, Wiet RJ. Should ossicular reconstruction be staged following tympanomastoidectomy. Laryngoscope 2006;1:4751
14 Yung M. Long-term results of ossiculoplasty: reasons for surgical failure. Otol Neurotol 2006;1:20–6
15 Silverstein H, McDaniel AB, Lichtenstein R. A comparison of PORP, TORP, and incus homograft for ossicular reconstruction in chronic ear surgery. Laryngoscope 1986;1:159–65
16 Geyer G. Materials for reconstruction of the middle ear. HNO 1999;1:7791
17 Hüttenbrink KB. Surgical treatment of chronic otitis media III: Middle ear reconstruction. HNO 1994;1:701–18
18 Olgun L, Kandagon T, Gultekin G, Guler G, Cerci U. Short term results of ossicular reconstruction with titanium-gold TORP in chronic otitis media surgery. KBB Forum 2005;1:153–6
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Journal of Laryngology & Otology
  • ISSN: 0022-2151
  • EISSN: 1748-5460
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-laryngology-and-otology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 62 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 349 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 21st February 2017 - 21st January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.