Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T23:36:52.197Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Complications after type one thyroplasty: is day-case surgery feasible?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2017

D Bray*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology / Head and Neck Surgery, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, UK
J P Young
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology / Head and Neck Surgery, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, UK
M L Harries
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology / Head and Neck Surgery, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Mr D Bray, 6 Bedford Terrace, Chapel Place, Royal Tunbridge Wells TN1 1YJ, UK E-mail: dbray@doctors.org.uk

Abstract

Objectives and hypothesis:

Isshiki type one medialisation thyroplasty is an accepted treatment for a unilateral immobile vocal fold. It can also be performed simultaneously as a bilateral procedure in patients with severe bowing of the vocal folds (e.g. presbyphonia). The objectives of this study were to assess the incidence and timing of post-operative complications, and to evaluate whether patients undergoing this operation could, in future, be treated as day cases.

Study design and methods:

A retrospective analysis was undertaken of 57 consecutive patients who had undergone a type one thyroplasty (52 unilateral and five bilateral) at a tertiary referral centre between April 2003 and April 2006. Post-operative improvement in the voice (measured subjectively, perceptually and quantitatively) was considered to constitute a successful outcome. Any complications were documented.

Results:

Fifty-seven patients who had undergone laryngeal framework surgery were recruited from the study database. All of these patients had undergone either unilateral or bilateral type one medialisation thyroplasty but no arytenoid surgery. Thirty-seven were male (65 per cent) and 20 female (35 per cent), and there was left-sided predominance (74 per cent). All patients were discharged the morning following afternoon surgery (i.e. within 24 hours). Complications occurred in four patients (7 per cent). One patient, who was taking warfarin, developed a post-operative haematoma which resolved with conservative treatment. Two patients (both of whom had undergone revision thyroplasty) developed a wound infection three days post-operatively, which resolved with antibiotics. One patient returned with hoarseness five months post-operatively, after an initially successful result. This patient had previously received radiotherapy for early glottic carcinoma, and the Silastic® implant was eroding through the mucosa. This was subsequently removed under general anaesthesia. No patients developed complications leading to airway compromise.

Conclusion:

The only complications in this series were in patients taking anticoagulation medication, undergoing revision surgery, or in whom the laryngeal tissue was atrophic or absent. Careful patient selection to exclude any of the above should reduce the risk of complications. The authors would therefore advocate type one thyroplasty for unilateral or bilateral vocal fold paralysis as a suitable procedure for day-case surgery within our department.

Type
Main Article
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Payr, E. Plastic on the thyroid cartilage for adjustment in unilateral vocal cord palsy [in German]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1915;43:1265–70Google Scholar
2 Isshiki, N, Okamura, H, Ishikawa, T. Thyroplasty type 1 (lateral compression) for dysphonia due to vocal cord paralysis or atrophy. Acta Otolaryngol 1975;80:465–73CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3 Netterville, JL, Stone, RE, Luken, ES, Civantos, FJ, Ossoff, RH. Silastic medialisation and arytenoid adduction; the Vanderbilt experience. A review of 116 phonosurgical procedures. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993;102:413–24CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 Rosingh, HJ, Dikkers, FG. Thyroplasty to improve the voice in patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis. Clin Otolaryngol 1995;20:124–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5 Cotter, CS, Avidano, MA, Crary, MA, Cassini, NJ, Gorham, MM. Laryngeal complications after type 1 thyroplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;113:671–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6 Isshiki, N, Shoji, K, Kojima, H, Hirano, S. Vocal fold atrophy and its surgical management. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996;105:182–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Tucker, HM, Wanamaker, J, Martin, T, Douglas, H. Complications of laryngeal framework surgery (phonosurgery). Laryngoscope 1993;103:525–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8 Royal College of Surgeons of England. Guidelines for Day Surgery. London: Royal College of Surgeons of England, 1992Google Scholar
9 Rosen, CA. Complications of phonosurgery: results of a national survey. Laryngoscope 1998;108:1697–703CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10 Weinman, EC, Maragos, NE. Airway compromise in thyroplasty surgery. Laryngoscope 2000;110:1082–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11 Abraham, MT, Gonen, M, Kraus, DH. Complications of type 1 thyroplasty and arytenoid adduction. Laryngoscope 2001;111:1322–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed