Skip to main content
×
Home

Effects of anatomical variation on trainee performance in a virtual reality temporal bone surgery simulator

  • P Piromchai (a1) (a2), I Ioannou (a1), S Wijewickrema (a1), P Kasemsiri (a2), J Lodge (a3), G Kennedy (a3) and S O'Leary (a1)...
Abstract
Abstract Objective:

To investigate the importance of anatomical variation in acquiring skills in virtual reality cochlear implant surgery.

Methods:

Eleven otolaryngology residents participated in this study. They were randomly allocated to practice cochlear implant surgery on the same specimen or on different specimens for four weeks. They were then tested on two new specimens, one standard and one challenging. Videos of their performance were de-identified and reviewed independently, by two blinded consultant otolaryngologists, using a validated assessment scale. The scores were compared between groups.

Results:

On the standard specimen, the round window preparation score was 2.7 ± 0.4 for the experimental group and 1.7 ± 0.6 for the control group (p = 0.01). On the challenging specimen, instrument handling and facial nerve preservation scores of the experimental group were 3.0 ± 0.4 and 3.5 ± 0.7 respectively, while the control group received scores of 2.1 ± 0.8 and 2.4 ± 0.9 respectively (p < 0.05).

Conclusion:

Training on temporal bones with differing anatomies is beneficial in the development of expertise.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Dr Patorn Piromchai, Department of Surgery (Otolaryngology), University of Melbourne, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002, Australia E-mail: patorn@gmail.com
References
Hide All
1 Stefanidis D. Optimal acquisition and assessment of proficiency on simulators in surgery. Surg Clin North Am 2010;90:475–89
2 McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Petrusa ER, Scalese RJ. Effect of practice on standardised learning outcomes in simulation-based medical education. Med Educ 2006;40:792–7
3 Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Champion H, Higgins G, Fried MP, Moses G et al. Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training. Ann Surg 2005;241:364–72
4 Flint PW, Haughey BH, Lund VJ, Niparko JK, Richardson MA, Robbins KT et al. Cummings Otolaryngology: Head & Neck Surgery. Philadelphia: Mosby, 2010
5 Paparella MM. Otolaryngology. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1991
6 Snow JB, Wackym PA, Ballenger JJ. Ballenger's Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Shelton, CT: People's Medical Pub. House/B C Decker, 2009
7 Awad Z, Ahmed S, Taghi AS, Ghufoor K, Wareing MJ, Patel N et al. Feasibility of a synthetic temporal bone for training in mastoidectomy: face, content, and concurrent validity. Otol Neurotol 2014;35:1813–18
8 Agus M, Giachetti A, Gobbetti E, Zanetti G, Zorcolo A, John NW et al. Mastoidectomy simulation with combined visual and haptic feedback. Stud Health Technol Inform 2002;85:1723
9 Fried MP, Sadoughi B, Gibber MJ, Jacobs JB, Lebowitz RA, Ross DA et al. From virtual reality to the operating room: the endoscopic sinus surgery simulator experiment. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010;142:202–7
10 Ho AK, Alsaffar H, Doyle PC, Ladak HM, Agrawal SK. Virtual reality myringotomy simulation with real-time deformation: development and validity testing. Laryngoscope 2012;122:1844–51
11 Wiet GJ, Stredney D, Kerwin T, Hittle B, Fernandez SA, Abdel-Rasoul M et al. Virtual temporal bone dissection system: OSU virtual temporal bone system: development and testing. Laryngoscope 2012;122(suppl 1):S112
12 Piromchai P. Virtual reality surgical training in ear, nose and throat surgery. Int J Clin Med 2014;5:558–66
13 Klein GA. The Power of Intuition: How to Use Your Gut Feelings to Make Better Decisions at Work. New York: Currency/Doubleday, 2004
14 Norman G. Expertise in medicine and surgery. In: Ericsson K, ed. The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006;901
15 Schmidt HG, Rikers RM. How expertise develops in medicine: knowledge encapsulation and illness script formation. Med Educ 2007;41:1133–9
16 Norman GR. Problem-solving skills, solving problems and problem-based learning. Med Educ 1988;22:279–86
17 Crochet P, Aggarwal R, Dubb SS, Ziprin P, Rajaretnam N, Grantcharov T et al. Deliberate practice on a virtual reality laparoscopic simulator enhances the quality of surgical technical skills. Ann Surg 2011;253:1216–22
18 Francis DM. Surgical decision making. ANZ J Surg 2009;79:886–91
19 Carr MM. Program directors' opinions about surgical competency in otolaryngology residents. Laryngoscope 2005;115:1208–11
20 Piromchai P, Kasemsiri P, Wijewickrema S, Ioannou I, Kennedy G, O'Leary S. The construct validity and reliability of an assessment tool for competency in cochlear implant surgery. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:192741
21 Zhao YC, Kennedy G, Yukawa K, Pyman B, O'Leary S. Improving temporal bone dissection using self-directed virtual reality simulation: results of a randomized blinded control trial. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;144:357–64
22 Zhao YC, Kennedy G, Yukawa K, Pyman B, O'Leary S. Can virtual reality simulator be used as a training aid to improve cadaver temporal bone dissection? Results of a randomized blinded control trial. Laryngoscope 2011;121:831–7
23 Mangus B, Rivas A, Tsai BS, Haynes DS, Roland JT Jr. Surgical techniques in cochlear implants. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2012;45:6980
24 Malik MU, Varela DA, Park E, Masood H, Laeeq K, Bhatti NI et al. Determinants of resident competence in mastoidectomy: role of interest and deliberate practice. Laryngoscope 2013;123:3162–7
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Journal of Laryngology & Otology
  • ISSN: 0022-2151
  • EISSN: 1748-5460
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-laryngology-and-otology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 8
Total number of PDF views: 79 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 316 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 28th October 2016 - 17th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.