Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T03:37:19.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Post-operative ear canal volume measurements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

K. Ojala*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, University of Oulu, oulu, Finland
M. Sorri
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, University of Oulu, oulu, Finland
P. Sipilä
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, University of Oulu, oulu, Finland
*
Kauko Ojala, M.D., Yliopistonkatu 1–3 E 63, 20110 Turku 11, Finland

Abstract

Post-operative volume determinations have been made of the ear canals of 93 chronic ears operated on radically (removing the bony posterior meatal wall at operation, obliterating the surgical cavity by musculoperiosteal flap, and reconstucting the meatus, by soft-tissue only in 81 ears, or by cortical bone chips and soft tissue in 12 ears), and of 30 normal ears, using a liquied-filling method and by determining the compliance of the ear canal at a pressure of +200 mm. H2O.

The liquid-filling method gave more exact results than did the impedance measureemnts, and the results of the later showed more dispersion in all groups of ears. In 51 ears without post-operative cavities and reconstructed without bone chips, the mean value of the ear canal volume was 0.9 ml. by the liquid-filling method, and 1.5 ml, by the compliance method (p<0.001). The corresponding values for 30 ears with post-operative cavities, but without bony reconstruction of the meatus, were 1.5 ml. and 1.9 ml. (p<0.01). The values were 0.9 ml. and 1.2 ml. in 12 ears with posterior canal walls reconstructed with bone chips (p<0.01), and 0.8 ml. and 1.0 ml. in 39 normal ears (p<0.001). The liquid method seems to be a very exact method, but quite trouble-some in routine clinical use; the compliance method is suitable in most ears in which there has been bony reconstruction of the posterior meatal wall, but not in ears in which the posterior ear canal wasll has been reconstructed with solft tissues only, because the soft posterior meatal wall was mobile at +200 mm. H2O pressure.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andrew, W. F. (1956) Modified radical mastoidectomy with reconstruction of the ear canal. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 65: 201213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ojala, K. (1979) Late results of obliteration operation in chronic otitis media. Thesis. Acta Universitatis Ouluensis, D 47, Ophthalmologica et Oto-Rhino-Laryngologica, 5: 1106.Google Scholar
Palva, T. (1963) Surgery of chronic ear without cavity. Archives of Otolaryngology, 77: 570580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palva, T. (1973) Operative technique in mastoid obliteration. Acta Otolaryngologica (Stockholm). 75: 289290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palva, T., Palva, A. and Kärjä, J. (1970) Cavity obliteration and Ear Canal Size. Archives of Otolaryngology, 92: 366371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sorri, M. (1979) Impedance audiometry as a post-operative study. Thesis. Acta Universitatis Ouluensis. D. 45, 1116.Google Scholar