Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

A two-cycle prospective audit of temporal bone computed tomography scan requests: improving the clinical applicability of radiology reports

  • A Qureishi (a1), G Garas (a1), J Shah (a2) and J Birchall (a1)

Radiologists require accurate clinical information to formulate reports. This is particularly relevant to computed tomography of the temporal bone, in which previous surgery can mimic disease.


The information provided with temporal bone computed tomography scan requests was evaluated. The study aimed to minimise inappropriate requests and improve the clinical value of reports.


A two-cycle prospective audit was undertaken using a proforma designed on the basis of national guidelines. Following the first cycle (in which the requests and reports of 100 scans were evaluated), new guidelines and training were implemented. A follow-up audit (of 50 scans) was then performed.


Following intervention, the percentage of clinically relevant reports increased from 52 to 94 (p < 0.01), whilst unnecessary or inappropriate scan requests decreased from 11 to 2 per cent (p < 0.05).


Optimising the clinical value of temporal bone computed tomography scan requests will have positive implications for patient care, time management and cost. The quality of the clinical information provided can have a significant impact on the clinical value of radiology reports, and can mean that unnecessary irradiation is avoided.

Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Mr A Qureishi, 9 Cranbourne Close, Slough SL1 2XH, UK E-mail:
Hide All

Presented orally at the Royal Society of Medicine, 5 October 2012, London, UK.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

1 CL Sistrom , CP Langlotz . A framework for improving radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 2005;2:159–67

2 AB Rickett , DB Finlay , C Jagger . The importance of clinical details when reporting accident and emergency radiographs. Injury 1992;23:458–60

3 W Boonn , CP Langlotz . Radiologist use of and perceived need for patient data access. J Digit Imaging 2009;22:357–62

4 A Leslie , A Jones , P Goddard . The influence of clinical information on the reporting of CT by radiologists. Brit J Radiology 2000;73:1052–5

5 CT Loy , L Irwig . Accuracy of diagnostic tests read with and without clinical information: a systematic review. JAMA 2004;292:1602–9

7 JR Savage , GM Weiner . Litigation in otolaryngology – trends and recommendations. J Laryngol Otol 2006;120:1001–4

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Journal of Laryngology & Otology
  • ISSN: 0022-2151
  • EISSN: 1748-5460
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-laryngology-and-otology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 5 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 219 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.