Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Understanding the low uptake of bone-anchored hearing aids: a review

  • R Powell (a1), A Wearden (a1), S M Pardesi (a1) and K Green (a2)
Abstract Background:

Bone-anchored hearing aids improve hearing for patients for whom conventional behind-the-ear aids are problematic. However, uptake of bone-anchored hearing aids is low and it is important to understand why this is the case.


A narrative review was conducted. Studies examining why people accept or decline bone-anchored hearing aids and satisfaction levels of people with bone-anchored hearing aids were reviewed.


Reasons for declining bone-anchored hearing aids included limited perceived benefits, concerns about surgery, aesthetic concerns and treatment cost. No studies providing in-depth analysis of the reasons for declining or accepting bone-anchored hearing aids were identified. Studies of patient satisfaction showed that most participants reported benefits with bone-anchored hearing aids. However, most studies used cross-sectional and/or retrospective designs and only included people with bone-anchored hearing aids.


Important avenues for further research are in-depth qualitative research designed to fully understand the decision-making process for bone-anchored hearing aids and rigorous quantitative research comparing satisfaction of people who receive bone-anchored hearing aids with those who receive alternative (or no) treatments.

Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Dr R Powell, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Coupland 1 Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK E-mail:
Hide All
5 D Siau , B Dhillon , R Andrews , KMJ. Green Bone-anchored hearing aids and unilateral sensorineural hearing loss: why do patients reject them? J Laryngol Otol 2015;129:321–5

6 RTK Siau , B Dhillon , D Siau , KMJ. Green Bone-anchored hearing aids in conductive and mixed hearing losses: why do patients reject them? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016;273:3117–22

7 HT Andersen , SA Schrøder , P. Bonding Unilateral deafness after acoustic neuroma surgery: subjective hearing handicap and the effect of the bone-anchored hearing aid. Otol Neurotol 2006;27:809–14

8 SA Schrøder , T Ravn , P. Bonding BAHA in single-sided deafness: patient compliance and subjective benefit. Otol Neurotol 2010;31:404–8

9 F Zawawi , G Kabbach , M Lallemand , SJ. Daniel Bone-anchored hearing aid: why do some patients refuse it? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2014;78:232–4

10 JM Burkey , LP Berenholz , WH. Lippy Latent demand for the bone-anchored hearing aid: the Lippy Group experience. Otol Neurotol 2006;27:648–52

13 AFM Snik , FF Jorritsma , CWRJ Cremers , AJ Beynon , NW. van den Berge The super-bass bone-anchored hearing aid compared to conventional hearing aids. Audiological results and the patients’ opinions. Scand Audiol 1992;21:157–61

15 E Jonas , S Schulz-Hardt , D Frey , N. Thelen Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: an expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information. J Pers Soc Psychol 2001;80:557–71

16 W Hart , D Albarracín , AH Eagly , I Brechan , MJ Lindberg , L. Merrill Feeling validated versus being correct: a meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychol Bull 2009;135:555–88

17 RC Nelissen , EAM Mylanus , CWRJ Cremers , MKS Hol , AFM. Snik Long-term compliance and satisfaction with percutaneous bone conduction devices in patients with congenital unilateral conductive hearing loss. Otol Neurotol 2015;36:826–33

18 JW House , JW Kutz Jr., J Chung , LM. Fisher Bone-anchored hearing aid subjective benefit for unilateral deafness. Laryngoscope. 2010;120:601–7

19 S Gatehouse , W. Noble The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol 2004;43:8599

20 I Pai , C Kelleher , T Nunn , N Pathak , M Jindal , AF O'Connor Outcome of bone-anchored hearing aids for single-sided deafness: a prospective study. Acta Otolaryngol 2012;132:751–5

21 JK Niparko , KM Cox , LR. Lustig Comparison of the bone anchored hearing aid implantable hearing device with contralateral routing of offside signal amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness. Otol Neurotol 2003;24:73–8

22 MK Hol , AJ Bosman , AF Snik , EA Mylanus , CW. Cremers Bone-anchored hearing aid in unilateral inner ear deafness: a study of 20 patients. Audiol Neurootol 2004;9:274–81

23 RM Cox , GC. Alexander The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear 1995;16:176–86

24 MK Hol , AJ Bosman , AF Snik , EA Mylaus , CW. Cremers Bone-anchored hearing aids in unilateral inner ear deafness: an evaluation of audiometric and outcome measurements. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:9991006

26 MK Hol , MA Spath , PF Krabbe , CT van der Pouw , AF Snik , CW Cremers The bone anchored hearing aid: quality of life assessment. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:394–9

27 R. Brooks EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 1996;37:5372

28 JE Ware , CD. Sherbourne The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I: Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473–83

29 IM Ventry , B. Weinstein The hearing handicap inventory for the elderly: a new tool. Ear Hear 1982;3:128–34

30 RH Powell , SP Burrell , HR Cooper , DW. Proops The Birmingham bone anchored hearing aid programme: paediatric experience and results. J Laryngol Otol 1996;110(suppl 21):21–9

31 CW Newman , SA Sandridge , LM. Wodzisz Longitudinal benefit from and satisfation with the BAHA system for patients with acquired unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Otol Neurotol 2008;29:1123–31

32 JJ Wazen , J Spitzer , SN Ghossaini , A Kacker , A. Zschommler Results of the bone-anchored hearing aid in unilateral hearing loss. Laryngoscope 2001;111:955–8

33 EAM Mylanus , AFM Snik , CWRJ. Cremers Patients’ opinions of bone-anchored vs conventional hearing aids. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;121:421–5

34 MK Hol , AF Snik , EA Mylanus , CW. Cremers Long-term results of bone-anchored hearing aid wearers who had previously used air-conduction hearing aids. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;131:321–5

35 EAM Mylanus , CTM van der Pouw , AFM Snik , CWRJ. Cremers Intraindividual comparison of the bone anchored hearing aid and air-conduction hearing aids. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;124:271–6

36 K Badran , D Bunstone , AK Arya , R Suryanarayanan , N. Mackinnon Patient satisfaction with the bone-anchored hearing aid: a 14-year experience. Otol Neurotol 2006;27:659–66

37 SN Dutt , AL McDermott , A Jelbert , AP Reid , DW. Proops Day to day use and service-related issues with the bone-anchored hearing aid: the Entific Medical Systems questionnaire. J Laryngol Otol 2002;116(suppl 28):20–8

38 M Bance , SM Abel , BC Papsin , P Wade , J. Vendramini A comparison of the audiometric performance of bone anchored hearing aids and air conduction hearing aids. Otol Neurotol 2002;23:912–19

41 M Barbara , M Biagini , AI Lazzarino , S. Monini Hearing and quality of life in a south European BAHA population. Acta Otolaryngol 2010;130:1040–7

42 K Robinson , S Gatehouse , G. Browning Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and therapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996;105:415–22

43 MJF de Wolf , JM Leijendeckers , EAM Mylanus , MKS Hol , AFM Snik , CWRJ. Cremers Age-related use and benefit of the bone-anchored hearing aid compact. Otol Neurotol 2009;30:787–92

44 S Kramer , S Goverts , W Dreschler , M Boymans , JM. Festen International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): results from the Netherlands. Int J Audiol 2002;41:3641

45 MJF de Wolf , M-LC Shival , MKS Hol , EAM Mylanus , CWRJ Cremers , AFM. Snik Benefit and quality of life in older bone-anchored hearing aid users. Otol Neurotol 2010;31:766–72

46 JB Hinderink , PF Krabbe , BP. Van Den Development and application of a health-related quality-of-life instrument for adults with cochlear implants: the Nijmegen cochlear implant questionnaire. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;123:756–65

48 SN Dutt , AL McDermott , SP Burrell , HR Cooper , AP Reid , DW. Proops Patient satisfaction with bilateral bone-anchored hearing aids: the Birmingham experience. J Laryngol Otol 2002;116(suppl 28):3746

49 AL McDermott , SN Dutt , AP Reid , DW. Proops An intra-individual comparison of the previous conventional hearing aid with the bone-anchored hearing aid: the Nijmegen group questionnaire. J Laryngol Otol 2002;116(suppl 28):1519

50 C Fuchsmann , S Tringali , F Disant , G Buiret , C Dubreuil , P Froehlich Hearing rehabilitation in congenital aural atresia using the bone-anchored hearing aid: audiological and satisfaction results. Acta Otolaryngol 2010;130:1343–51

53 J Rasmussen , SO Olsen , LH. Nielsen Evaluation of long-term patient satisfaction and experience with the Baha® bone conduction implant. Int J Audiol 2012;51:194–9

54 D Gillett , JW Fairley , TS Chandrashaker , A Bean , J. Gonzalez Bone-anchored hearing aids: results of the first eight years of a programme in a district general hospital, assessed by the Glasgow benefit inventory. J Laryngol Otol 2006;120:537–42

55 DW. Proops The Birmingham bone anchored hearing aid programme: surgical methods and complications. J Laryngol Otol Suppl 1996;110 (Suppl21):712

56 EC Ho , P Monksfield , E Egan , A Reid , D. Proops Bone-anchored hearing aid: patient satisfaction with the Cordelle device. Otol Neurotol 2009;30:793–9

57 ATM Mace , A Isa , LD. Cooke Patient quality of life with bone-anchored hearing aid: 10-year experience in Glasgow, Scotland. J Laryngol Otol 2009;123:964–8

58 CM McLarnon , T Davison , IJ. Johnson Bone-anchored hearing aid: comparison of benefit by patient subgroups. Laryngoscope 2004;114:942–4

59 ML McNeil , M Gulliver , DP Morris , M. Bance Quality of life improvement for bone-anchored hearing aid users and their partners. J Laryngol Otol 2011;125:554–60

60 RC Nelissen , EAM Mylanus , HPM Kunst , RJE Pennings , AFM Snik , MKS. Hol A new bone-anchored hearing implant: short-term retrospective data on implant survival and subjective benefit. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013;270:3019–25

61 N Saroul , L Gilain , A Montalban , F Giraudet , P Avan , T. Mom Patient satisfaction and functional results with the bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA). Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2011;128:107–13

62 D Stephens , T Board , J Hobson , H. Cooper Reported benefits and problems experienced with bone-anchored hearing aids. Br J Audiol 1996;30:215–20

63 SDG Stephens , R. Meredith Qualitative reports of hearing aid benefit. Clin Rehabil 1991;5:225–9

65 S Tringali , AB Grayeli , D Bouccara , O Sterkers , S Chardon , C Martin A survey of satisfaction and use among patients fitted with a BAHA. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2008;265:1461–4

66 JJ Wazen , DL Young , MC Farrugia , SS Chandrasekhar , SN Ghossaini , J Borik Successes and complications of the Baha system. Otol Neurotol 2008;29:1115–19

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Journal of Laryngology & Otology
  • ISSN: 0022-2151
  • EISSN: 1748-5460
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-laryngology-and-otology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 13
Total number of PDF views: 98 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 399 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 26th January 2017 - 26th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.