Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T21:36:39.869Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Export-Led Growth in Latin America: 1870–1930

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

Roberto Cortés Conde
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1949 Raúl Prebisch, an Argentine economist, published a study for the United Nations’ Economic Commission for Latin America (ECLA), in which he attributed the failure to reach sustained economic growth in Latin America to the international division of labour. Based on research carried out by ECLA on the terms of trade between manufactures and primary goods, he concluded that – contrary to expectations – they moved against primary products. If prices decline as productivity increases (in competitive markets), industrial goods, where the technological improvements had been more significant, should have declined in price more than agricultural goods. The empirical results of the study showed the opposite.1 If the Latin American countries therefore wanted to benefit from technological progress, they should move towards industrialisation. Almost at the same time, based on the same empirical study, Hans Singer not only argued that the gains from trade had not been distributed equally, but also that foreign investments in the export sector were not part of the domestic economy, but represented an enclave belonging to the countries of the centre which received its benefits.2 Singer advanced an argument that became popular later on; he noted the existence in the underdeveloped countries of a dual economy with two sectors each with different productivity and segmented markets: a modern sector linked to the central countries and a traditional sector linked to the rest of the economy. Also, from the critics of the classical theory of trade, another argument was put forward: the different income elasticities of demand for manufactures and agricultural goods (Engels’ law) suggested that expenditure on agricultural goods would decline in relative terms as incomes rose, hurting the terms of trade for primary products.3

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Latin American Studies , Volume 24 , Supplement S1 , March 1992 , pp. 163 - 179
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 United Nations, Economic Survey of Latin America, 1949, Secretariat of Economic Commission for Latin America (Prebisch, Raúl) (New York, 1951).Google Scholar

2 Singer, H., ‘The Distribution of Gains Between Investing and Borrowing Countries’, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, vol. 40 (May 1950), pp. 473–485.Google Scholar

3 Nurkse, R., Patterns of Trade and Development (Oxford, 1961).Google Scholar

4 Conde, R. Cortés, ‘The Growth of the Export Economies, Latin America in the Second Half of the XIX Century’, in Tulchin, J., Problems in Latin American History, The Modern Period (New York, 1973), pp. 158–159.Google Scholar

5 Prebisch, R., ‘Five Stages in My Thinking on Development’, in Meier, Gerald M. and Seers, Dudley, Pioneers in Development (New York, 1984).Google Scholar

6 Rostow, W., The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto (Cambridge, 1960).Google Scholar

7 Levin, J., Export Economies. Their Pattern of Development in Historical Perspective (Cambridge, 1960).Google Scholar

8 Pinto, A., S. C., Chile, un case de desarrollo frustrado (Santiago, 1962)Google Scholar; Furtado, C., The Economic Growth of Brazil (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1965).Google Scholar

9 Ferrer, A., The Argentine Economy (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1965).Google Scholar

10 Frank, André Gunder, Capitalism and Under development in Latin America, Historical Studies of Chile and Brazil (New York, 1967).Google Scholar

11 Haberler, G., ‘Terms of Trade and Economic Development’, in Ellis, H. S. (ed.), Economic Development for Latin America (New York, 1960), pp. 275–303.Google Scholar

12 Innis, H. A., Essays in Canadian Economic History (Toronto, 1957).Google ScholarWatkins, M., ‘A Staple Theory of Economic Growth’, Canadian Journal of Economic and Political Science, May, 1963.Google Scholar

13 Conde, R. Cortés and Hunt, S. (eds.), The Latin American Economies, Growth and the Export Sector 1880–1930 (New York, 1985).Google Scholar

14 Ferrer, A., The Argentine Economy (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1967).Google Scholar

15 Díaz-Alejandro, C., Essays on the Economic History of the Argentine Republic (New Haven, 1970), p. 11.Google Scholar

16 Ibid., p. 9.

17 See note 12.

18 See Rostow, , Stages of Economic Growth.Google Scholar

19 North, D., ‘Location Theory and Regional Economic Growth’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 62 (1955).Google Scholar

20 Gallo, E., ‘Agrarian Expansion and Industrial Development in Argentina, 1880–1930’, in Cart, Raymond (ed.), Latin American Affairs (Oxford, 1970).Google Scholar

21 Presedo, V. Vázquez, El caso argentino (Buenos Aires, 1971).Google ScholarMíguez, E., Las tierras de los ingleses en la Argentina 1870–1914 (Buenos Aires, 1985).Google Scholar

22 Conde, R. Cortes, The First Stages of Modernisation in Spanish America (New York, 1974), pp. 148–152.Google Scholar

23 Conde, R. Cortés, ‘The Export Economy of Argentina 1880–1920’, in Conde, Roberto Cortés and Hunt, Shane (eds.), The Latin American Economies (New York, 1985), pp. 354–355.Google Scholar

24 Prado, C. Jr., The Colonial background of Modern Brazil (California, 1967)Google Scholar; Furtado, C., The Economic Growth of Brazil.Google Scholar

25 North, D., ‘Ocean Freight Rates’, journal of Economic History, vol. 18 (1958).Google Scholar

26 Dean, W., ‘The Brazilian Economy, 1870–1914’, in Bethell, Leslie (ed.), Cambridge History of Latin America, vol. v (Cambridge, 1986), p. 363.Google Scholar

27 Furtado, , The Economic Growth of Brazil.Google Scholar

28 Dean, W., ‘The Brazilian Economy 1870–1930’.Google Scholar

29 Furtado, , The Economic Growth of Brazil, p. 197.Google Scholar

30 Dean, W., The Industrialization of São Paulo 1880–1945 (Austin, 1969).Google Scholar

31 Pelaez, Carlos, Historia da Industrializção Brasileira (Rio de Janeiro, 1972), pp. 23–32.Google Scholar

32 Fishlow, A., ‘Origins and Consequences of Import Substitution in Brazil’, in Di Marco, L. (ed.), International Economics and Development (New York, 1972).Google Scholar

33 De Mello, J. Cardoso and Da Conceição Tavares, M., ‘The Capitalist Export Economy of Brazil, 1884–1950’, in Conde, Cortés and Hunt, (eds.), The Latin American Economies.Google Scholar

34 Versiani, F. R., Industrial Investment in an ‘Export’ Economy, The Brazilian Experience Before 1914 (London, 1979)Google Scholar; Suzigan, W., ‘Investment in the Manufacturing Industry in Brazil, 1869–1939’, PhD diss., Univ. of London, 1984Google Scholar; Pelaez, C., Indústria Brasileira (Brasília, 1986).Google Scholar

35 Coatsworth, J., ‘Obstacles to Economic Growth in Nineteenth Century Mexico’, American Historical Review, vol. 83, no. 1 (1978), p. 82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

38 Ibid., p. 81.

37 Coatsworth, John, Growth Against Development: the Economic Impact of Railways in Porfirian Mexico (Illinois, 1980).Google Scholar

38 Rosenzweig, F., ‘El desarrollo económico de México de 1877 a 1911’, El Trimestre Económico, vol. 32, no. 3 [127] (Mexico, July-Sept. 1965).Google Scholar

39 Conde, R. Cortés, The First Stages of Modernization of Spanish America (New York, 1974), p. 83.Google Scholar

40 Haber, S., ‘La economía mexicana, 1830–1940: obstáculos a la industrialización (II)’, Revista de Historia Económica, vol. 8, no. 2. (1990), pp. 335–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

41 Ibid., p. 340.

42 Haber, S., Industry and Under development, The Industrialization of Mexico (Stanford, 1989).Google Scholar