Hostname: page-component-797576ffbb-k7d4m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-12-02T15:14:42.098Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

Elections, Public Awareness, and the Efficacy of Constitutional Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2022

Jay Krehbiel*
Affiliation:
West Virginia University
*
Contact the author at jay.krehbiel@mail.wvu.edu.

Abstract

Scholars have long recognized the importance of timing in political decision making. In this article, I consider the potential for the strategic timing of court decisions involving the constitutional review of statutes. As courts lack the ability to directly implement their decisions, scholars have identified an attentive public as invaluable for judicial authority. Building on this literature, I argue that the proximity of a national election increases awareness and thereby creates an environment conducive to the assertive exercise of constitutional review. I then present evidence of the electoral cycle’s effect on decision making at the German Federal Constitutional Court.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2019 by the Law and Courts Organized Section of the American Political Science Association. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bachl, Marko and Frank, Brettschneider. 2011. “The German National Election Campaign and the Mass Media.” German Politics 20 (1): 5174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birnbaum, Michael. 2013. “In Germany, Campaigns Are Just Beginning for Sept. 22 Parliamentary Election.” Washington Post, August 17.Google Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet, Laura, Arnold and Christopher, Zorn. 1997. “The Strategic Timing of Position Taking in Congress: A Study of the North American Free Trade Agreement.” American Political Science Review 91 (2): 324–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Paul and Barbara, Hinckley. 1993. “Presidential Activities from Truman through Reagan: Timing and Impact.” Journal of Politics 55 (2): 382–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A., and James, L. Gibson. 1995. “The Legitimacy of the Court of Justice in the European Union: Models of Institutional Support.” American Political Science Review 89 (2): 356–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A. and Christopher, Zorn. 2004. “Strategic Timing, Position-Taking, and Impeachment in the House of Representatives.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (4): 517–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driscoll, Amanda and Michael, Nelson. 2014. “Ignorance or Opposition? Blank and Spoiled Votes in Low-Information, Highly Politicized Environments.” Political Research Quarterly 67 (3): 547–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Lee, Knight, Jack and Olga, Shvetsova. 2001. “The Role of Constitutional Courts in the Establishment and Maintenance of Democratic Systems of Government.” Law and Society Review 35 (1): 117–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fass, Thorsten. 2015. “The German Federal Election of 2013: Merkel’s Triumph, the Disappearance of the Liberal Party, and Yet Another Grand Coalition.” West European Politics 38 (1): 238–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., Gregory, A. Caldeira, and Vanessa, A. Baird. 1998. “On the Legitimacy of National High Courts.” American Political Science Review 92 (2): 343–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom. 2003. Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goplerud, Max and Petra, Schleiter. 2016. “An Index of Assembly Dissolution Powers.” Comparative Political Studies 49 (4): 427–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagle, Timothy. 1993. “Strategic Retirements: A Political Model of Turnover on the United States Supreme Court.” Political Behavior 15 (1): 2548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hönnige, Christoph. 2009. “The Electoral Connection: How the Pivotal Judge Affects Oppositional Success at European Constitutional Courts.” West European Politics 32:963–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kam, Cindy and Robert, Franzese. 2007. Modeling and Interpreting Interactive Hypotheses in Regression Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Khazan, Olga. 2013. “Why Germany’s Politics Are Much Saner, Cheaper, and Nicer Than Ours.” Atlantic, September 30.Google Scholar
Kommers, Donald. 1994a. “The Constitutional Law of Abortion in Germany: Should Americans Pay Attention?” Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy 10 (1): 132.Google Scholar
Kommers, Donald. 1994b. “The Federal Constitutional Court in the German Political System.” Comparative Political Studies 26:470–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kommers, Donald and Russell, Miller. 2012. The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany. 3rd ed. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Krewel, Mona, Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger and Ansgar, Wolsing. 2011. “The Campaign and Its Dynamics at the 2009 German General Election.” German Politics 20:2850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur and Kaare, Strøm. 1995. “Coalition Termination and the Strategic Timing of Parliamentary Elections.” American Political Science Review 89 (3): 648–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reutter, Werner. 2006. “Yet Another Coup d’Etat? Gerhard Schröder’s Vote of Confidence and Parliamentary Government in Germany.” German Politics 15 (3): 302–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, James R. 2001. “Information and Judicial Review: A Signaling Game of Legislative-Judicial Interaction.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (1): 8499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schleiter, Petra and Margit, Tavits. 2016. “The Electoral Benefits of Opportunistic Election Timing.” Journal of Politics 78 (3): 836–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoenbach, Klaus. 1987. “The Role of Mass Media in West German Election Campaigns.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 12 (3): 373–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoenbach, Klaus, Ridder, Jan, and Edmund, Lauf. 2001. “Politicians on TV News: Getting Attention in Dutch and German Election Campaigns.” European Journal of Political Research 39 (4): 519–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semetko, Holli and Klaus, Schoenbach. 2003. “German Bundestag Campaigns in the Bild, 1990–2002.” International Journal of Press/Politics 8 (3): 5469.Google Scholar
Spriggs, James F., II, and Paul, J. Wahlbeck. 1995. “Calling It Quits: Strategic Retirement on the Federal Courts of Appeals, 1893–1991.” Political Research Quarterly 48 (3): 573–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staton, Jeffrey K. 2006. “Constitutional Review and the Selective Promotion of Case Results.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (1): 98112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staton, Jeffrey K. 2010. Judicial Power and Strategic Communication in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanberg, Georg. 2001. “Legislative-Judicial Relations: A Game-Theoretic Approach to Constitutional Review.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (2): 346–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanberg, Georg. 2005. The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith. 2005. “‘Interpose Your Friendly Hand’: Political Supports for the Exercise of Judicial Review by the United States Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 99:583–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkler, Heinrich August. 2007. Germany: The Long Road West. Vol. 2, 1933–1990. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar