Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T09:48:34.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The DXC technology work experience program: disability-inclusive recruitment and selection in action

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2019

Justin Carrero ,
Anna Krzeminska  and
Charmine E. J. Härtel
Justin Carrero*
Affiliation:
The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Anna Krzeminska
Affiliation:
Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
Charmine E. J. Härtel
Affiliation:
The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
*
*Corresponding author. Email: J.Carrero@business.uq.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

With the rapid advancement of innovative technology, coupled with IT being a core function in contemporary business, there has been an upward trend of multi-national companies (MNCs) reporting a skill deficit in areas such as data analytics and cybersecurity (Columbus, 2017. IBM predicts demand for data scientists will soar 28% By 2020. Forbes; NeSmith, 2018. The cybersecurity gap is an industry crisis. Forbes). In a recent survey with over 3,000 CIOs, 65% indicated their organizations were unable to maintain par with the progression of technology in areas such as data analytics and security due to a lack of adequate talent (Harvey Nash & KPMG, 2018. CIO survey 2018). Although, organizations have recently started to expand their talent pipeline following a neurological breakthrough: research as well as anecdotal evidence suggests adults with mild forms of autism display above-average intelligence, increased attention focus, and high visual–spatial abilities; a combination in high market demand for roles such as software testing, data analysis, cybersecurity, and engineering due to their uncanny ability with pattern recognition, information processing, analytics, and attention to detail.

These auspicious developments come at the helm of an increasing rate of governments around the world implementing provisions to their labour regulations towards equitable hiring of people with disabilities (Myors et al., 2017. Perspectives from 22 countries on the legal environment for selection. Handbook of Employee Selection. 659–677. Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School of Business.). Some, such as France, Japan, Kenya, Korea, and Taiwan, have gone so far as to set quota targets (Myors et al., 2017. Perspectives from 22 countries on the legal environment for selection. Handbook of Employee Selection. 659–677. Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School of Business.). The implication for organizations is that they need to develop disability-inclusive recruitment and selection systems along with work designs and environments that are disability friendly. But what does this mean in practice? What does a disability-inclusive recruitment and selection system look like?

Enter DXC Technology (DXC): born out of a merger between global conglomerate Computer Science Corporation and Hewlett Packard Enterprise, generating close to $25 billion annually in revenue, with clients across more than 70 countries, they strategically became a pioneer in the digital transformation that was taking place globally. In the wake of the breakthrough in employment diversity, DXC recognized this as an opportunity to gain a critical edge within the increasingly competitive talent pool market. First, design a program of their own for recruiting and selecting adults with high functioning autism. Next, through a collaboration with various universities including the University of Queensland and Macquarie University, Neurodiversity Hubs were established; an initiative designed to assist neurodivergent students with obtaining work experience and internships. In doing so, they faced the following key challenges: How could they design a recruitment and selection strategy for neurodivergent individuals that was equitable, ethical, and efficient? In particular, where could they find suitable neurodivergent candidates, what criteria should they use to select them, and how should they handle unsuccessful candidates to ensure beneficial outcomes for all stakeholders?

Keywords

diversity and inclusionrecruitmentselectionhuman resource managementdisabilities
Type
Case Study
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 25 , Special Issue 4: Neurodiversity , July 2019 , pp. 535 - 542
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Annabi, H., & Locke, J. (2018). A theoretical framework for investigating the context for creating employment success in information technology for individuals with autism. Journal of Management & Organization, in press.Google Scholar
Bengisu, M., & Balta, S. (2011). Employment of the workforce with disabilities in the hospitality industry. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19(1), 35–57.Google Scholar
Bruyère, S. M. (Ed.). (2016). Disability and employer practices: research across the disciplines. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Columbus, L. (2017). IBM predicts demand for data scientists will soar 28% By 2020. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/louiscolumbus/2017/05/13/ibm-predicts-demand-fordata-scientists-will-soar-28-by-2020/#583776717e3b.Google Scholar
Fujimoto, Y., Rentschler, R., Le., H., Edwards, D., & Härtel, C. E. J. (2014). Lessons learned from community organizations: Inclusion of people with disabilities and others. British Journal of Management, 25(3), 518–537.Google Scholar
Harlan, S. L., & Robert, P. M. (1998). The social construction of disability in organizations: Why employers resist reasonable accommodation. Work and Occupations, 25(4), 397–435.Google Scholar
Härtel, C. E. J., Härtel, G. F., & Trumble, R. B. (2013). IDADA: The individual difference approach to assessing and developing diversity awareness. Journal of Management and Organization, 19(1), 60–74.Google Scholar
Härtel, C. E. J., & O'Connor, J. M. (2015). Disabled persons in the workplace. In Syed, J. & Ozbilgin, M. (Eds.), Managing diversity and inclusion: an international perspective (pp. 215–243). Los Angeles, CA, USA: Sage.Google Scholar
Harvey Nash & KPMG. (2018). CIO survey 2018. Retrieved from https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2018/06/harvey-nash-kpmg-ciosurvey-2018.pdf.Google Scholar
Hedley, D., Cai, R., Uljarevic, M., Wilmot, M., Spoor, J. R., Richdale, A., & Dissanayake, C. (2017). Transition to work: Perspectives from the autism spectrum. Autism, 1362361316687697.Google Scholar
Kulkarni, M., & Lengnick-Hall, M. L. (2011). Socialization of people with disabilities in the workplace. Human Resource Management, 50(4), 521–540.Google Scholar
Luecking, R. G. (2008). Emerging employer views of people with disabilities and the future of job development. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 29(1), 3–13.Google Scholar
Meacham, H., Cavanagh, J., Shaw, A., & Bartram, T. (2017). HRM practices that support the employment and social inclusion of workers with an intellectual disability. Personnel Review, 46(8), 1475–1492.Google Scholar
Myors, B., Lievens, F., Schollaert, E., Van Hoye, G., Cronshow, S. F., Mladinic, A., … Schuler, H. (2017). Perspectives from 22 countries on the legal environment for selection. Handbook of Employee Selection. 659–677. Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School of Business. Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/580Google Scholar
Nelissen, P. T. J. H., Hülsheger, U. R., van Ruitenbeek, G. M. C., & Zijlstra, F. R. H. (2016). How and when stereotypes relate to inclusive behavior toward people with disabilities. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27, 1610–1625.Google Scholar
NeSmith, B. (2018). The cybersecurity gap is an industry crisis. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2018/08/09/the-cybersecuritytalent-gap-is-an-industry-crisis/#70d6de30a6b3Google Scholar
Remington, A., & Pellicano, E. (in this issue). ‘Sometimes you just need someone to take a chance on you’: An internship programme for autistic graduates at Deutsche Bank, UK. Journal of Management & Organization, 1–19. doi:10.1017/jmo.2018.66Google Scholar
She, P., & Livermore, G. A. (2007). Material hardship, poverty, and disability among working-age adults. Social Science Quarterly, 88(4), 970–989.Google Scholar
Stone, D. L., & Williams, K. J. (1997). The impact of ADA on the selection process: Applicant and organizational issues. Human Resource Management Review, 7(2), 203–231.Google Scholar
Waisman-Nitzan, M., Gal, E., & Schreuer, N. (in this issue). Employers’ perspectives regarding reasonable accommodations for employees with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Management & Organization, 1–18. doi:10.1017/jmo.2018.59Google Scholar
Woodhams, C., & Corby, S. (2007). Then and now: Disability legislation and employers’ practices in the UK. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 45(3), 556580.Google Scholar
United States Department of Labor. (2018). Tax incentives for employers. Retrieved from: https://www.dol.gov/odep/topics/TaxIncentivesForEmployers.htmGoogle Scholar
Van den Bosch, K., Krzeminska, A., Song, E., Van Hal, L., Waltz, M., Ebben, H., & Schippers, A. (in this issue). Nothing about us, without us: A case study of a consumer-run organization by and for people on the autism spectrum in the Netherlands. Journal of Management & Organization, 1–17. doi:10.1017/jmo.2018.54Google Scholar
Von Schrader, S., Malzer, V., & Bruyère, S. (2014). Perspectives on disability disclosure: The importance of employer practices and workplace climate. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 26(4), 237–255.Google Scholar
Vornholt, K., Uitdewilligen, S., & Nijhuis, F. J. (2013). Factors affecting the acceptance of people with disabilities at work: A literature review. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 23(4), 463–475.Google Scholar