Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-gs9qr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-29T22:39:24.129Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of abusive supervision on subordinates’ discretionary behaviors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2019

Farah Samreen Open the ORCID record for Farah Samreen [Opens in a new window] ,
Muhammad Amir Rashid  and
Ghulam Hussain
Farah Samreen*
Affiliation:
COMSATS University, Islamabad, Pakistan
Muhammad Amir Rashid
Affiliation:
Head of Department, Management Sciences, COMSATS University, Islamabad, Pakistan
Ghulam Hussain
Affiliation:
Management Sciences, COMSATS University, Islamabad, Pakistan
*
*Corresponding author. Email: farahsamreen11@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although previous studies provide diverse perspectives on subordinate's deviant behavior as a reaction to abusive supervision (ABS), the influence of ABS on subordinates’ inter-personal relations received little attention. Grounded on social exchange theory, this study proposes that subordinates who are being abused by the same supervisor develop a bond among each other. That further provides strength to each of the abused group member to exhibit deviant behaviors against supervisor and non-abused peer group. Data were collected and analyzed through mediation analysis using AMOS. Using a sample of 920 employees from multi-sector organizations it was found that abused employees show citizenship behavior toward other abused peer-group members and counter-productive behavior toward supervisor and non-abused peer-group members. Moreover, citizenship behaviors created among the abused peer-group members partially mediate the relationship of ABS and counter-productive work behavior.

Keywords

leadershiporganizational citizenship behaviormobbingbullyingcounterproductive behaviorsAsia

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , January 2022 , pp. 149 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abubakar, A. M., Megeirhi, H. A., & Shneikat, B. (2018). Tolerance for workplace incivility, employee cynicism and job search behavior. The Service Industries Journal, 38(9–10), 629–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abubakar, A. M., Yazdian, T. F., & Behravesh, E. (2018). A riposte to ostracism and tolerance to workplace incivility: A generational perspective. Personnel Review, 47(2), 441–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquino, K., & Douglas, S. (2003). Identity threat and antisocial behavior in organizations: The moderating effects of individual differences, aggressive modeling, and hierarchical status. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90(1), 195–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquino, K., Tripp, T. M., & Bies, R. J. (2006). Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 653–668.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., Sun, L. Y., & Debrah, Y. A. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 191–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron, R. A., Neuman, J. H., & Geddes, D. (1999). Social and personal determinants of workplace aggression: Evidence for the impact of perceived injustice and the Type A behavior pattern. Aggressive Behavior, 25(4), 281–296.3.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basford, T. E., & Offermann, L. R. (2012). Beyond leadership: The impact of coworker relationships on employee motivation and intent to stay. Journal of Management & Organization, 18(6), 807–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, R. J., Deen, C., Harvey, P., Leonard, S. R., Li, Y., Mackey, J., & Restubog, S. L. D. (2018, July). Abusive supervision: Causes and consequences. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2018(1), 12757.Google Scholar
Blanken, I., van de Ven, N., Zeelenberg, M., & Meijers, M. H. (2014). Three attempts to replicate the moral licensing effect. Social Psychology, 45(3), 232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomme, R. J., Kodden, B., & Beasley-Suffolk, A. (2015). Leadership theories and the concept of work engagement: Creating a conceptual framework for management implications and research. Journal of Management & Organization, 21(2), 125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canham, H. (2002). Group and gang states of mind. Journal of Child Psychotherapy, 28(2), 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X. P., He, W., & Weng, L. C. (2018). What is wrong with treating followers differently? The basis of leader–member exchange differentiation matters. Journal of Management, 44(3), 946–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2), 278–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen-Charash, Y., & Mueller, J. S. (2007). Does perceived unfairness exacerbate or mitigate interpersonal counterproductive work behaviors related to envy? Journal of applied psychology, 92(3), 666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colquitt, J. A., Noe, R. A., & Jackson, C. L. (2002). Justice in teams: Antecedents and consequences of procedural justice climate. Personnel Psychology, 55(1), 83–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of management, 31(6), 874–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalal, R. S. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1241–1255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dalal, R. S., Lam, H., Weiss, H. M., Welch, E., & Hulin, C. L. (2009). A dynamic approach to organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior: Behavioral co-occurrence and switching, and dynamic relationships with mood and overall job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52(5), 1051–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dansereau, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(1), 46–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, M. K., Shaw, J. D., Scott, K. L., & Tepper, B. J. (2006). The moderating roles of self-esteem and neuroticism in the relationship between group and individual undermining behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1066–1077.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, C. D., Locke, E. A., & Henne, D. L. (1992). The new look in job satisfaction theory and research. In Job satisfaction: Advances in research and applications (pp. 165–194). The Free Press.Google Scholar
Forret, M., & Sue Love, M. (2008). Employee justice perceptions and coworker relationships. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 29(3), 248–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaskin, J. (2016a). Stats tools package. Retrieved September 10, 2018, from http://statwiki.kolobkreations.comGoogle Scholar
Gaskin, J. (2016b). Estimands and plugins, stats tool package. Retrieved April 1, 2019, from http://statwiki.kolobkreations.comGoogle Scholar
Geurts, S. A., Buunk, B. P., & Schaufeli, W. B. (1994). Health complaints, social comparisons, and absenteeism. Work & Stress, 8(3), 220–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glomb, T. M., & Liao, H. (2003). Interpersonal aggression in work groups: Social influence, reciprocal, and individual effects. Academy of Management Journal, 46(4), 486–496.Google Scholar
Gong, Y., Chang, S., & Cheung, S. Y. (2010). High performance work system and collective OCB: A collective social exchange perspective. Human Resource Management Journal, 20(2), 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giacalone, R. A., & Promislo, M. D. (2014). Handbook of Unethical Work Behavior: Implications for Individual Well-Being: Implications for Individual Well-Being. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haar, J. M., de Fluiter, A., & Brougham, D. (2016). Abusive supervision and turnover intentions: The mediating role of perceived organisational support. Journal of Management & Organization, 22(2), 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis: Pearson Education. New Jersey: Hoboken.Google Scholar
Hannah, S. T., Schaubroeck, J. M., Peng, A. C., Lord, R. G., Trevino, L. K., Kozlowski, S. W., … & Doty, J. (2013). Joint influences of individual and work unit abusive supervision on ethical intentions and behaviors: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(4), 579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harmon, J., Scotti, D. J., Behson, S., & Farias, G. (2003). Effects of high-involvement work systems on employee satisfaction and service costs in veterans’ healthcare. Journal of Healthcare Management, 48(6), 393–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, K. J., Harvey, P., Harris, R. B., & Cast, M. (2013). An investigation of abusive supervision, vicarious abusive supervision, and their joint impacts. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153(1), 38–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrison, D. A., & Shaffer, M. A. (1994). Comparative examinations of self-reports and perceived absenteeism norms: Wading through Lake Wobegon. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(2), 240–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobman, E. V., Restubog, S. L. D., Bordia, P., & Tang, R. L. (2009). Abusive supervision in advising relationships: Investigating the role of social support. Applied Psychology, 58(2), 233–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. Revised and expanded. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hung, T. K., Chi, N. W., & Lu, W. L. (2009). Exploring the relationships between perceived coworker loafing and counterproductive work behaviors: The mediating role of a revenge motive. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24(3), 257–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ilies, R., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Leader-member exchange and citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 269–277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inness, M., Barling, J., & Turner, N. (2005). Understanding supervisor-targeted aggression: A within-person, between-jobs design. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 731–739.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johns, G. (1994). How often were you absent? A review of the use of self-reported absence data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 574–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, D. A. (2009). Getting even with one's supervisor and one's organization: Relationships among types of injustice, desires for revenge, and counterproductive work behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(4), 525–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelloway, E. K., Francis, L., Prosser, M., & Cameron, J. E. (2010). Counterproductive work behavior as protest. Human Resource Management Review, 20(1), 18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, S., O'Neill, J. W., & Cho, H. M. (2010). When does an employee not help co-workers? The effect of leader–member exchange on employee envy and organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(3), 530–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, X. Y., & Wang, J. (2013). Abusive supervision and organizational citizenship behaviour: Is supervisor–subordinate Guanxi a mediator? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(7), 1471–1489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R., Guillaume, Y., Thomas, G., Lee, A., & Epitropaki, O. (2016). Leader–Member exchange (LMX) and performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 67–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinko, M. J., Harvey, P., Brees, J. R., & Mackey, J. (2013). A review of abusive supervision research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(S1), S120-S137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathieu, J. E., & Kohler, S. S. (1990). A test of the interactive effects of organizational commitment and job involvement on various types of absence. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 36(1), 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, A. C., Effron, D. A., & Monin, B. (2010). Moral self-licensing: When being good frees us to be bad. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(5), 344–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. T., & Effron, D. A. (2010). Chapter three-psychological license: When it is needed and how it functions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 115–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, M. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2007). Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1159–1168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgeson, F. P., & Hofmann, D. A. (1999). The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: It's construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 10(2), 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organ, D. W., & Paine, J. B. (1999). A new kind of performance for industrial and organizational psychology: Recent contributions to the study of organizational citizenship behavior. In Cooper, C. L. & Robertson, I. T. (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology 1999 (Vol. 14, pp. 337–368). New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Paillé, P. (2010). Citizenship in the workplace: Examining work attitudes as predictors among French employee. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(4), 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pakistan Bureau of Statistics, Retrieved November, 2nd, 2018. Retrieved from http://www.pbs.gov.pk.Google Scholar
Pelletier, K. L. (2010). Leader toxicity: An empirical investigation of toxic behavior and rhetoric. Leadership, 6(4), 373–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, A. C., Schaubroeck, J. M., & Li, Y. (2014). Social exchange implications of own and co-workers' experiences of supervisory abuse. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), 1385–1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Impact of organizational citizenship behavior on organizational performance: A review and suggestion for future research. Human performance, 10(2), 133–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Blume, B. D. (2009). Individual-and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of applied Psychology, 94(1), 122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Priesemuth, M., Arnaud, A., & Schminke, M. (2013). Bad behavior in groups the impact of overall justice climate and functional dependence on counterproductive work behavior in work units. Group & Organization Management, 38(2), 230–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priesemuth, M., & Schminke, M. (2019). Helping thy neighbor? Prosocial reactions to observed abusive supervision in the workplace. Journal of Management, 45(3), 1225–1251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priesemuth, M., Schminke, M., Ambrose, M. L., & Folger, R. (2014). Abusive supervision climate: A multiple-mediation model of its impact on group outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), 1513–1534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purcell, J., & Hutchinson, S. (2007). Front-line managers as agents in the HRM-performance causal chain: Theory, analysis and evidence. Human Resource Management Journal, 17(1), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Rebecca & Stamper, Christina L. (2001). Corporate citizenship and deviancy: A study of discretionary work behavior. In Galbraith, Craig S. (Ed.), Strategies and Organizations in Transition (International Research in the Business Disciplines (Vol. 3, pp. 265–284). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Robinson, S. L., & O'Leary-Kelly, A. M. (1998). Monkey see, monkey do: The influence of work groups on the antisocial behavior of employees. Academy of Management Journal, 41(6), 658–672.Google Scholar
Rudolph, U., Roesch, S., Greitemeyer, T., & Weiner, B. (2004). A meta-analytic review of help giving and aggression from an attributional perspective: Contributions to a general theory of motivation. Cognition and Emotion, 18(6), 815–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sackett, P. R. (2002). The structure of counterproductive work behaviors: Dimensionality and relationships with facets of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10(1-2), 5–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sackett, P. R., Berry, C. M., Wiemann, S. A., & Laczo, R. M. (2006). Citizenship and counterproductive behavior: Clarifying relations between the two domains. Human Performance, 19(4), 441–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 3(2), 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schyns, B., Felfe, J., & Schilling, J. (2018). Is it me or you? How reactions to abusive supervision are shaped by leader behavior and follower perceptions. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schyns, B., & Schilling, J. (2013). How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 138–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, S. G., & Lane, V. R. (2000). A stakeholder approach to organizational identity. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sin, H. P., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2009). Understanding why they don't see eye to eye: An examination of leader–member exchange (LMX) agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 1048..CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skarlicki, D. P., & Rupp, D. E. (2010). Dual processing and organizational justice: The role of rational versus experiential processing in third-party reactions to workplace mistreatment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2002). An emotion-centered model of voluntary work behavior: Some parallels between counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 12(2), 269–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2005). The Stressor-Emotion Model of Counterproductive Work Behavior. In Fox, S. & Spector, P. E. (Eds.), Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets (pp. 151–174). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, S., & Rupp, D. E. (2009). Angry, guilty, and conflicted: Injustice toward coworkers heightens emotional labor through cognitive and emotional mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 178–190.Google Scholar
Tepper, B. J. (2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33(3), 261–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tepper, B. J., Carr, J. C., Breaux, D. M., Geider, S., Hu, C., & Hua, W. (2009). Abusive supervision, intentions to quit, and employees’ workplace deviance: A power/dependence analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(2), 156–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., & Shaw, J. D. (2001). Personality moderators of the relationship between abusive supervision and subordinates' resistance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 974–983.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tepper, B. J., Henle, C. A., Lambert, L. S., Giacalone, R. A., & Duffy, M. K. (2008). Abusive supervision and subordinates' organization deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 721–732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tepper, B. J., Simon, L., & Park, H. M. (2017). Abusive supervision. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 123–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thau, S., Bennett, R. J., Mitchell, M. S., & Marrs, M. B. (2009). How management style moderates the relationship between abusive supervision and workplace deviance: An uncertainty management theory perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 79–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidyarthi, P. R., Liden, R. C., Anand, S., Erdogan, B., & Ghosh, S. (2010). Where do I stand? Examining the effects of leader–member exchange social comparison on employee work behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 849–861.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wat, D., & Shaffer, M. A. (2005). Equity and relationship quality influences on organizational citizenship behaviors: The mediating role of trust in the supervisor and empowerment. Personnel Review, 34(4), 406–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 82–111.Google Scholar
Wu, J. B., Tsui, A. S., & Kinicki, A. J. (2010). Consequences of differentiated leadership in groups. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 90–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zellers, K. L., Tepper, B. J., & Duffy, M. K. (2002). Abusive supervision and subordinates’ organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(6), 1068–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar