Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T13:42:07.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The impact of future time orientation on employees’ feedback-seeking behavior from supervisors and co-workers: The mediating role of psychological ownership

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2015

Jing Qian ,
Xiaosong Lin ,
Zhuo R. Han ,
Bowen Tian ,
George Z. Chen  and
Haiwan Wang
Jing Qian
Affiliation:
Department of Human Resource Management, Business School, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
Xiaosong Lin*
Affiliation:
School of Management, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China
Zhuo R. Han
Affiliation:
Beijing Key Lab of Applied Experimental Psychology, School of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
Bowen Tian
Affiliation:
Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
George Z. Chen
Affiliation:
Research School of Management, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
Haiwan Wang
Affiliation:
Business School, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
*
Corresponding author: xiaosong.lin@xmu.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Future time orientation is essential if an employee is to be motivated to conduct activities that generate long-term rather than immediate gain, and which may involve risk. Given that feedback seeking requires the employee to slow down and seek input, it is surprising that little is known about the relationship between future time orientation and feedback seeking. Drawing upon psychological ownership theory and construal-level theory, we hypothesized a positive influence of future time orientation on feedback seeking from various sources (i.e., supervisors and co-workers). We also hypothesized job-based psychological ownership as a newly identified motive of feedback seeking and employed it to explain how future time orientation exerts influences. Tested with data from a sample of 228 subordinate–supervisor dyads from China, the results revealed that (1) future time orientation was positively related to feedback seeking from supervisors and co-workers and (2) job-based psychology ownership mediated the relationship between future time orientation and feedback seeking.

Keywords

feedback seekingfeedback sourcefuture time orientationpsychological ownership
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , May 2015 , pp. 336 - 349
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, J. (2009). The role of time perspective in smoking cessation amongst older English adults. Health Psychology, 28, 529–534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anseel, F., Beatty, A. S., Shen, W., Lievens, F., & Sackett, P. R. (2015). ‘How are we doing after 30 years?’ A meta-analytic review of the antecedents and outcomes of feedback-seeking behavior. Journal of Management, 41, 318–348.Google Scholar
Anseel, F., & Lievens, F. (2007). The relationship between uncertainty and desire for feedback: A test of competing hypotheses. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 1007–1040.Google Scholar
Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., Sun, L., & Debrah, Y. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision in Chinese setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 191–201.Google Scholar
Ashford, S. J. (1986). Feedback-seeking in individual adaptation: A resource perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 465–487.Google Scholar
Ashford, S. J., & Black, J. S. (1996). Proactivity during organizational entry: The role of desire for control. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashford, S. J., Blatt, R., & VandeWalle, D. (2003). Reflections on the looking glass: A review of research on feedback-seeking behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 29, 773–799.Google Scholar
Ashford, S. J., & Northcraft, G. B. (1992). Conveying more (or less) than we realize: The role of impression-management in feedback seeking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53, 310–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashford, S. J., & Tsui, A. S. (1991). Self-regulation for managerial effectiveness: The role of active feedback seeking. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 251–280.Google Scholar
Bagozzi, R., & Heatherton, T. (1994). A general approach to representing multifaceted personality constructs: Application to self-esteem. Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 35–67.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A socialcognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Beaglehole, E. (1932). Property: A study in social psychology. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Behling, O., & Law, K. S. (2000). Translating questionnaires and other research instruments: Problems and solutions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 139–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein, & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 349–381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Boniwell, I., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2004). Balancing time perspective in pursuit of optimal functioning. In P. A. Linley, & S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 165–178). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Brislin, R. W. (1990). Applied cross-cultural psychology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Callister, R. R., Kramer, M. W., & Turban, D. B. (1999). Feedback seeking following career transitions. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 429–438.Google Scholar
Chen, Z. G., Lam, W., & Zhong, J. A. (2007). Leader–member exchange and member performance: A new look at individual-level negative feedback-seeking behavior and team-level empowerment climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 202–212.Google Scholar
Chiaburu, D., & Harrison, D. A. (2008). Do peers make the place? Conceptual synthesis and meta-analysis of lateral social influences on perceptions, attitudes, OCBs, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1082–1103.Google Scholar
Crommelinck, M., & Anseel, F. (2013). Understanding and encouraging feedback-seeking behaviour: A literature review. Medical Education, 47, 232–241.Google Scholar
De Stobbeleir, K. E. M., Ashford, S. J., & Buyens, D. (2011). Self-regulation of creativity at work: The role of feedback-seeking behavior in creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 811–831.Google Scholar
Dittmar, H. (1992). The social psychology of material possessions: To have is to be. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Epel, E. S., Bandura, A., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1999). Escaping homelessness: The influences of self-efficacy and time perspective on coping with homelessness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 575–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedor, D. B., Rensvold, R. B., & Adams, S. M. (1992). An investigation of factors expected to affect feedback seeking: A longitudinal field study. Personnel Psychology, 45, 799–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, L., Nota, L., & Soresi, S. (2010). Time perspective and indecision in young and older adolescents. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 38, 61–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Formanek, R. (1991). Why they collect: Collectors reveal their motivations. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 275–286.Google Scholar
Fraisse, P. (1963). The psychology of time. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Furby, L. (1978). Possessions: Toward a theory of their meaning and function throughout the life cycle. In P. B. Baltes (Ed.), Life span development and behavior (pp. 297–336). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gupta, A. K., Govindarajan, V., & Malhotra, A. (1999). Feedback-seeking behavior within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 205–222.Google Scholar
House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Ilgen, D. R., Fisher, C. D., & Taylor, S. M. (1979). Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 359–371.Google Scholar
Janssen, O., & Prins, J. (2007). Goal orientations and the seeking of different types of feedback information. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, 235–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 233–265). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Keough, K. A., Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Who’s smoking, drinking, and using drugs? Time perspective as a predictor of substance use. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 149–164.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in the social sciences: Selected theoretical papers. New York, NY: Harper.Google Scholar
Liberman, N., Sagristano, M. D., & Trope, Y. (2002). The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 523–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal level theory and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17, 113–117.Google Scholar
Litwinski, L. (1947). The psychology of ‘mine’. Philosophy, 22, 240–251.Google Scholar
Milkman, K. L., Rogers, T., & Bazerman, M. H. (2008). Harnessing our inner angels and demons: What we have learned about want/should conflicts and how that knowledge can help us reduce short-sighted decision making. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 324–338.Google Scholar
Miller, V. D., & Jablin, F. M. (1991). Information seeking during organizational entry: Influences, tactics, and a model of the process. The Academy of Management Review, 16, 92–120.Google Scholar
Morrison, E. W. (1993). Newcomer information seeking: Exploring types, modes, sources, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 557–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. (2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26, 298–310.Google Scholar
Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology, 7, 84–107.Google Scholar
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qian, J., Lin, X. S., & Chen, Z. X. (2012). Authentic leadership and feedback-seeking behavior: An examination of the cultural context of mediating processes in China. Journal of Management and Organization, 18, 286–299.Google Scholar
Rim, S., Hansen, J., & Trope, Y. (2013). What happens why: Psychological distance and focusing on causes (vs.) consequences of events. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 104, 457–472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rucker, D. D., Preacher, K. J., Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 359–371.Google Scholar
Steelman, L., Levy, P., & Snell, A. (2004). The feedback environment scale: Construct definition, measurement, and validation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 165–184.Google Scholar
Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Edwards, C. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 742–752.Google Scholar
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110, 403–421.Google Scholar
Usunier, J. C., & Valette-Florence, P. (2007). The temporal styles scale: A review of developments and replications over 15 years. Temporal and Society, 16, 333–366.Google Scholar
Vancouver, J. B., & Morrison, E. W. (1995). Feedback inquiry: The effect of source attributes and individual differences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 276–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VandeWalle, D., & Cummings, L. L. (1997). A test of the influence of goal orientation on the feedback-seeking process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 390–400.Google Scholar
VandeWalle, D., Ganesan, S., Challagalla, G. N., & Brown, S. P. (2000). An integrated model of feedback-seeking behavior: Disposition, context and cognition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 996–1003.Google Scholar
VanDyne, L., & Pierce, J. L. (2004). Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 439–459.Google Scholar
Wanberg, C. R., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. (2000). Predictors and outcomes of proactivity in the socialization process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 373–385.Google Scholar
Weil, S. (1952). The need for roots: Prelude to a declaration of duties towards mankind. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Whitaker, B. G., Dahling, J. J., & Levy, P. (2007). The development of a feedback environment and role clarity model of job performance. Journal of Management, 33, 570–591.Google Scholar
Williams, J. R., Miller, C. E., Steelman, L. A., & Levy, P. E. (1999). Increasing feedback seeking in public contexts: It takes two (or more) to tango. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 969–976.Google Scholar
Zaleski, Z. (1994). Psychology of future orientation. Lublin, Poland: Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL.Google Scholar
Zaleski, Z. (1996). Future anxiety: Concept measurement and preliminary research. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 165–174.Google Scholar
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271–1288.Google Scholar
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (2008). The time paradox. New York, NY: Free Press, Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar