Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-w5vf4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-03T00:36:27.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Testing for Intellectual Impairment—Some Comments Reconsidered

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

R. W. Payne  and
James Inglis
R. W. Payne
Affiliation:
Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario
James Inglis
Affiliation:
Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

As Piercy (1959) has pointed out, it is generally agreed that currently available psychological tests for detecting brain damage (Yates, 1954; Meyer, 1957) or early dementia (Shapiro, 1952; Inglis, 1958) are by and large poorly standardized and poorly validated. If the clinical psychologist attempts such detection he can make very few positive statements if all he does is administer those standardized tests which even approximately meet the commonly accepted standards of validity.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 106 , Issue 444 , July 1960 , pp. 1134 - 1138
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1960 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 Inglis, J., “An experimental study of learning and 'memory functions in elderly psychiatric patients”, J. Merit. Sci., 1957, 103, 796–803.Google Scholar
2 Idem , “Psychological investigations of cognitive deficit in elderly psychiatric patients”, Psychot. Bull., 1958, 55, 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Kelly, E. L., and Fiske, D. W., The Prediction of Performance in Clinical Psychology, 1951. Ann Harbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Meyer, V., “Critique of psychological approaches to brain damage”, J. Ment. Sci., 1957, 103, 80–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Idem , “Cognitive changes following temporal lobectomy for relief of temporal lobe epilepsy”, Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1959, 81, 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Payne, R. W., “The role of the clinical psychologist at the Institute of Psychiatry”, Rev. Psychol. Appliquée, 1953, 3, 150–160.Google Scholar
7 Idem , “Experimental method in clinical psychological practice”, J. Ment. Sci., 1957, 103, 189–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Idem , “Diagnostic and personality testing in clinical psychology”, Amer. J. Psychiat., 1958, 115, 25–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Piercy, M., “Testing for intellectual impairment—some comments on the tests and the testers”, J. Ment. Sci., 1959, 105, 489–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 Shapiro, M. B., “An experimental approach to diagnostic psychological testing”, ibid., 1951, 97, 748–764.Google Scholar
11 Idem , “Use of psychological tests for the differential diagnosis of early dementia”, Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1952, 45, 375, 376.Google Scholar
12 Idem , “Experimental method in the psychological description of the individual psychiatric patient”, Internat. J. Soc. Psychiat., 1957, 3, 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13 Yates, A. J., “The validity of some psychological tests of brain damage”, Psychol. Bull., 1954, 51, 359–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.