Skip to main content

American Superintendents and the New York Lunacy Commission


There is, and has been for some time, an indignant revolt on the part of the Superintendents of Asylums in the State of York and the State Commission in Lunacy. In England the almost unanimous feeling among mental specialists favours the existence of a Lunacy Board. With some exceptions the action of the Board in London has been fairly judicious. The late Lord Shaftesbury held the opinion strongly that very considerable freedom of action must be left to medical superintendents, even on points on which the Commissioners, individually or collectively, might entertain opposite views. In some instances in which this course has not been pursued by the Board, the result of the collision has been unfavourable to the authority of the Commissioners.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The British Journal of Psychiatry
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 2514-9946
  • URL: /core/journals/the-british-journal-of-psychiatry
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 2 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 11 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 19th February 2018 - 20th March 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

American Superintendents and the New York Lunacy Commission

Submit a response


No eLetters have been published for this article.


Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *