Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Cathcart v. Cathcart

Extract

The husband of the well-known Mrs. Cathcart sought a divorce on the ground of desertion. The proceedings were protracted, and occupied the Court of Session for three days. The only matter of interest to our readers is that Lord Low expressed a strong opinion that Mrs. Cathcart, when she left her husband, was of unsound mind. Since that date, however, a jury had found that she was sane, and in spite of this she had resisted all the entreaties of her husband to rejoin him. Although, therefore, he intimated that he would not have granted a divorce for a desertion for which the defender was not responsible owing to her unsoundness of mind, yet, as this desertion had been endorsed and continued by her after her restoration to sanity, she lost the benefit of her irresponsibility at the time of the desertion, and lost also her case. Judgment for the pursuer.—Lord Low.—Scotsman, June 17th, 28th, and 29th.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The British Journal of Psychiatry
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 2514-9946
  • URL: /core/journals/the-british-journal-of-psychiatry
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 3 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 10 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 19th February 2018 - 22nd June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Cathcart v. Cathcart

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.

×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *