Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-m259h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-15T11:53:25.359Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimental Studies of a Perceptual Anomaly

VI. The Application of the “Peephole” Analogy to the Perception of “Organic” Psychiatric Patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

M. B. Shapiro  and
Barbara Tizard
M. B. Shapiro
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry (University of London), Maudsley Hospital
Barbara Tizard
Affiliation:
London Hospital
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The experiment to be reported in this paper stems from previous work on the block design rotation effect (Shapiro, 2, 3, 4; Yates, 9, 10; Williams, Lubin et al., 7). As is well known, the block design test in its various forms: Kohs, Wechsler and Goldstein Scheerer, requires the subject to reproduce, with one-inch multi-coloured cubes, a series of abstract designs. It has been reported by a number of observers that subjects sometimes leave their reproductions in a rotated position, although otherwise the designs have been correctly reproduced.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 104 , Issue 436 , July 1958 , pp. 792 - 800
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1958 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Pavlov, I. P., Conditioned Reflexes, 1927. London: Oxford University Press, 1946 (trans. Anrep).Google Scholar
2. Shapiro, M. B., “Experimental Studies of a Perceptual Anomaly. I. Initial Experiments”, J. Ment. Sci., 1951, 97, 90–110.Google Scholar
3. Idem , “Experimental Studies of a Perceptual Anomaly. II. Confirmatory and Explanatory Experiments”, ibid., 1952, 98, 605–617.Google Scholar
4. Idem , “Experimental Studies of a Perceptual Anomaly. III. The Testing of an Explanatory Theory”, ibid., 1953, 99, 394–409.Google Scholar
5. Sherrington, C., The Integrative Action of the Nervous System, 1947. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
6. Tizard, B., A Theoretical and Experimental Study of the Relations between Higher Mental Processes and Brain Integrity, 1957. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of London Library.Google Scholar
7. Williams, H. L., Lubin, A., Gieseking, C., and Rubinstein, I., “An experimental study of block design rotation in brain-injured and controls”, J. Consult. Psychol., 1956, 20, 275–280.Google Scholar
8. Witken, H. A., and Asch, S. E., “Studies in Space Orientation. IV. Further Experiments on Perception of the Upright with Displaced Visual Fields”, J. Exp. Psychol., 1948, 38, 762–782.Google Scholar
9. Yates, A. J., “Experimental Studies of a Perceptual Anomaly. IV. The Effect of Monocular Vision on Rotation”, J. Ment. Sci., 1954, 100, 975–979.Google Scholar
10. Idem , “Experimental Studies of a Perceptual Anomaly. V. Some factors influencing the Appearance of the Block Design Rotation Effect in Normal Subjects”, ibid., 102, 1956, 761–771.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.