Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-r5qjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-11T23:11:29.585Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimental Studies on the Connection of Schizophrenia and Tuberculosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2018

A. Beck ,
W. Ogden  and
M. Whelen
A. Beck
Affiliation:
From the Central Pathological Laboratory, Mental Hospitals Department, and the Southern Group Laboratory, Public Health Department, London County Council
W. Ogden
Affiliation:
From the Central Pathological Laboratory, Mental Hospitals Department, and the Southern Group Laboratory, Public Health Department, London County Council
M. Whelen
Affiliation:
From the Central Pathological Laboratory, Mental Hospitals Department, and the Southern Group Laboratory, Public Health Department, London County Council
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Kraepelin and Morel were the first to emphasize the fact that tuberculosis is more common in schizophrenics than in other psychotics. Later on, Ganter, Zalla and Bonasera confirmed this statement with the support of a wide statistical inquiry. Thus Ganter found the mortality from tuberculosis in schizophrenics to be from 46 to 67%, whilst the general mortality-rate in tuberculosis in the Prussian asylums was only 16.6%; Bonasera found the tubercular mortality-rate to be 61.7%, and Zalla 67.5% in their autopsies on schizophrenics.

Information

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 81 , Issue 334 , July 1935 , pp. 514 - 523
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1935 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abély, , 1925 Congrès des Alién., Paris, Ann. Méd. Psych., 1925, lxxxiii 2, p. 122.Google Scholar
Anadiades, B., Papanargyrou, N., and Scouras, P., C.R. Soc. Biol., 1933, cxiv, p. 1271.Google Scholar
Baldi, F., ibid., 1934, cxv, p. 260.Google Scholar
Baruk, H., Bidermann, and Albani, , Paris Méd., 1932, lxxxv, p. 166.Google Scholar
Baruk, H., and Bertrand, Y., C.R. Soc. Biol., 1933, cxii, p. 369.Google Scholar
Beck, A., Klin. Wochenschr., 1933, p. 1280; Deutsch, med. Wochenschr., 1934, p. 644; Ann. Inst. Past., 1934, liii, p. 156; C.R. Soc. Biol., 1934, cxvi, p. 870.Google Scholar
Bogen, E., Bogen-Tietz, E., and Grace, F., Amer. Rev. Tuber., 1934, xxx, p. 35.Google Scholar
Bonasera, , Pisani, 1925, xlv.Google Scholar
Idem and Nègre, , Antigénotherapic de la tuberculose par les extraits méthyliques de bacilles de Koch, 1927 (Paris, Masson).Google Scholar
Botzaris, A., Zentralbl. Bakt., I. Orig., 1934, cxxxi, p. 276.Google Scholar
Claude, H., Valtis, B., Coste, F., and van Deinse, F., l'Encéphale, 1933. xxviii, p. 564.Google Scholar
Claude, H., and Coste, F., C.R. Soc. Biol., 1934, cxvi, p. 1356.Google Scholar
Dide, M., de Boissezon, P., and Aujaleu, P., ibid., 1934, cxvi, p. 421.Google Scholar
Fernandez, B., ibid., 1934, cxvi, pp. 167, 168.Google Scholar
Ganter, , Tuberkulose, 1926, vi, p. 84.Google Scholar
Hamel, J., and Courtier, G., Rév. Méd. de l'Est., 1931, lix, p. 69.Google Scholar
Hoering, F. O., Deutsch, med. Wochenschr., 1932, p. 251.Google Scholar
d'Hollander, F., and Rouvroy, C., Ann. Méd. Psych., 1932 xci, p. 417.Google Scholar
Holmes, E. M., Journ. State Med., 1934, xlii, p. 10.Google Scholar
Kimura, K., Tohoku Journ. Exp. Med., 1934, xxii, p. 475.Google Scholar
Kindermann, V., and Hoffmann, R., Med. Klin., 1933, xx, p. 1609.Google Scholar
Kottmann, (see Manteufel, ), ibid., 1932, xxviii, p. 111.Google Scholar
Kretschmer, (see Westphal, K., and Weltz, M.), Klin. Wochenschr., 1930, ix, p. 1025.Google Scholar
Lehmann-Facius, and Loeschke, H., Munch, med. Wochenschr., 1926, p. 1578.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, E., ibid., 1931; Med. Klin., 1932, xxviii, p. 1782; Zentralbl. Bakt., I. Orig., 1932, cxxiii, p. 510; Wien. klin. Wochenschr., 1933, p. 228.Google Scholar
Luxemburger, H., Zeitschr. Neurol., 1927, cix, p. 313.Google Scholar
McCartney, J. E., Lancet, 1933, ii, p. 433.Google Scholar
Mackie, T. J., and McCartney, J. E., An Introduction to Practical Bacteriology, fourth edition, 1934 (Edinburgh: E. & S. Livingstone).Google Scholar
Meyer, F., and Schaede, G., Psych. Neur. Wochenschr., 1931, xxxiii, p. 572.Google Scholar
Nasso, (see Calmette, ), L'infection bacillaire et la Tuberculose chez l'homme et chez les Animaux, 1928, p. 550 (Paris).Google Scholar
Ninni, C., and Bretey, J., C.R. Soc. Biol., 1933, cxiii, p. 968.Google Scholar
Puca, A., ibid., 1932, cxi, p. 258; ibid., 1933, cxiii, p. 359 Google Scholar
Rodiet, , Nevot, A., and Maillefer, T., ibid., 1934, cxvi, p. 814.Google Scholar
Saënz, A., Pascal, C., Costil, L., and Chapoulard, T., ibid., 1934, cxv, p. 1681.Google Scholar
Saënz, A., Ann. Inst. Past., 1934, lii, p. 645.Google Scholar
Idem and Costil, L. (see Calmette, Nègre and Boquet), Manuel Technique de Microbiologie et Serologie (Paris: Masson), 1933, p. 530.Google Scholar
Toulouse, , Schiff, , Valtis, and van Deinse, , Rev. Neurol., 1933, xl, p. 89.Google Scholar
Vie, , Soc. de. Psych. Encéphale, 1930, xxv.Google Scholar
Wilson, G. S., Tuberculous Bacillæmia, Medical Research Council, Special Report Series, 1933, No. 182, London.Google Scholar
Witebsky, Klingenstein and Kuhn, , Klin. Wochenschr., 1931, p. 7068.Google Scholar
Zalla, , Riv. Pat. Nerv, e Ment., 1922, xxvii; ibid., 1923, xxviii.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.