Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-kzqxb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-23T23:10:25.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perception of the Upright in Relation to Body Image

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

D. H. Bennett
D. H. Bennett*
Affiliation:
Consultant Psychiatrist Netherne Hospital, Coulsdon, Surrey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Concept of the Body Image and the Perception of the Human Body

The consideration of our awareness of our own bodies ceased to be wholly a philosophical problem when Pick (1908) and Head and Holmes (1911), having observed neurological disturbances of body awareness, first suggested the concept of a Body Image or Body Schema. The concept, has in its slow growth, become at times confused and has always resisted satisfactory definition. Pick himself made no attempt to define it, while for Head and Holmes it was a “postural model of the body” being constantly built up and changed by every new posture and movement and forming a “plastic schema” which was “the fundamental standard against which all postural changes are measured“. Schilder (1935) greatly enriched the concept by emphasizing not only its physiological and neuropathological basis but its psychological aspect. He defined it thus: “The image of the human body means the picture of our own body which we form in our mind, that is to say the way in which the body appears to ourselves.” This was a comprehensive “body image”; more than a perception or mere representation and including even Head and Holmes's “Body Schema“. The Body Schema concept has been more recently defined by Clifford Scott (1948) as “that conscious or unconscious integration of sensations, perceptions, conceptions, affects, memories or images of the body from the surface to its depths and from its surfaces to the limits of space and time”.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 102 , Issue 428 , July 1956 , pp. 487 - 506
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1956 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderson, E. W., and Rawnsley, K., Mschr. Psychiat. Neurol., 1954, 128, 38.Google Scholar
Angyal, A., Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat., 1935, 34, 270.Google Scholar
Idem , Ibid., 1936, 35, 1029.Google Scholar
Idem , Ibid., 1937, 38, 1047.Google Scholar
Idem and Blackman, N., Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat., 1940, 44, 611.Google Scholar
von Angyal, L., Arch. f. Psychiat., 1934, 102, 107.Google Scholar
Idem , Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat., 1937, 37, 629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bender, H., and Jung, R., Arch. f. Psychiat., 1948, 181, 193.Google Scholar
Bender, M. B., Disorders in Perception, 1952. Springfield: Thomas.Google Scholar
Beringer, K., Der Meskalinrausch, 1927. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brain, Sir Russell, Mind, Perception and Science, 1951. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Charcot, J. M., Leçons du Mardi a la Salpětrière, 1892. Vol 1, 2nd ed. Paris.Google Scholar
Critchley, M., The Parietal Lobes, 1953. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Federn, P., Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 1926, 7, 434.Google Scholar
Fellenius, V., Lokalisation in Psykologisk Pedagogisk Uppslagsbok, 1944. Vol. 11. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Gerstmann, J., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1942, 48, 890.Google Scholar
Goody, W., and Reinhold, M., Brain, 1952, 75, 472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , Ibid., 1953, 76, 337.Google Scholar
Idem , Ibid., 1954, 77, 416.Google Scholar
Gruen, A., Unpublished Ph.D., 1951. New York University Google Scholar
Guldberg, F. P., Z. Biol., 1897, 35, 419.Google Scholar
Gurewrrsch, M., Z. ges. Neurol. Psychiat., 1932, 140, 593.Google Scholar
Idem , Ibid., 1933, 146, 126.Google Scholar
Guttmann, E., J. Ment. Sci., 1936, 82, 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Head, H., and Holmes, G., Brain, 1911, 34, 102.Google Scholar
Hutton, E. J., article in Richter, D. (ed.), Perspectives in Neuropsychiatry, 1950. London: H. K. Lewis.Google Scholar
Klein, E., and Schilder, P. F., J. nerv. ment. Dis., 1929, 70, 241.Google Scholar
Kleint, H., Z. Psychol., 1937, 140, 109.Google Scholar
Krishaber, M., De la Névropathie Cérébrocardiaque, 1873. Paris.Google Scholar
Lenkner, H., Die Psychologischen Grundlagen der Fortbewegung des Menschen in der Verkehrstechnik (das Drall-Problem) Wurzburg, 1934.Google Scholar
Lund, F. H., J. Psychol., 1930, 42, 51.Google Scholar
Machover, K., Personality Projection in the Drawing of the Human Figure, 1949. Springfield: Thomas.Google Scholar
Mann, C. W., and Boring, R. O., J. exp. Psychol., 1953, 45, 44.Google Scholar
Mayer-Gross, W., Brit. J. med. Psychol., 1935, 15, 103.Google Scholar
McFie, J., Piercy, M. F., and Zangwill, O. L., Brain, 1950, 73, 167.Google Scholar
Nagel, W. A., Z. Psychol., 1898, 16, 373.Google Scholar
Neal, E., Amer. J. Psychol., 1926, 37, 287.Google Scholar
Norman, E., Brit. J. med. Psychol., 1954, 27, 126.Google Scholar
Pick, A., Arch. Psychiat. Nervenkr., 1904, 38, 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , Arbeiten aus der deutschen psychiatrischen Universitäts-Klinik in Prag, 1908. Berlin.Google Scholar
Reinhold, M., Brain, 1951, 74, 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reitman, F., Psychotic Art, 1950. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Roelofs, C. O., Arch. Augenheilk., 1936, 109, 212.Google Scholar
Rohracher, H., Einführung in die Psychologie, 1946. Vienna.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand, Human Knowledge, its Scope and Limits, 1948. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Sandström, C. I., Orientation in the Present Space, 1951. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wicksell.Google Scholar
Idem. J. exp. Psychol., 1954, 48, 209.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, A., J. Morph., 1928, 45, 293.Google Scholar
Schilder, P., Image and Appearance of the Human Body, 1935. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Scott, R. D., Brit. J. med. Psychol., 1951, 24, 254.Google Scholar
Idem, Personal communication, 1954.Google Scholar
Scott, W. C. M., Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 1948, 29, 141.Google Scholar
Shorvon, H. J., Proc. roy. Soc. Med., 1946, 39, 779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smythies, J. R., Brain, 1953, 76, 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stratton, G. M., Psychol. Rev., 1896, 3, 611.Google Scholar
Szymanski, J. S., Pflüg- Arch., 1913, 151, 158.Google Scholar
Taine, H., De L'Intelligence, 1870. Paris.Google Scholar
Teuber, H. L., J. nerv. and ment. Dis., 1951, 114, 413.Google Scholar
Idem , The Biology of Mental Health and Disease, 1952. New York: Hoeber, Harper.Google Scholar
Idem , and Miskin, M., J. Psychol., 1954, 38, 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thouless, R. H., Brit. J. Psychol., 1932, 22, 216.Google Scholar
Urbantschitch, V., Arch. ges. Physiol., 1903, 42, 154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, H., and Wapner, S., J. Personality, 1949, 18, 88.Google Scholar
Witkin, H. A., and Asch, S. E., J. exp. Psychol., 1948, 38, 603.Google Scholar
Witkin, H. A., J. Personality, 1949a, 18, 145.Google Scholar
Idem , Trans. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 1949b, 12, 22.Google Scholar
Idem , J. exp. Psychol., 1953, 46, 135.Google Scholar
Idem , Lewis, H. B., Hertzman, M., Machover, K., Meissner, P. B., and Wapner, S. Personality Through Perception, 1954. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.