Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-zlgnt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T11:55:39.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prefrontal Leucotomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

G. W. T. H. Fleming
G. W. T. H. Fleming*
Affiliation:
Barnwood House, Gloucester
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The operation of prefrontal leucotomy or, as some call it, prefrontal lobotomy, is one of the most startling of modern therapeutic procedures. It was introduced in Portugal by Moniz (1936)—the actual operation being performed by Lima—and was subsequently developed in Italy and in America. In this country it was first carried out at the Burden Neurological Institute in Bristol on December 11, 1940. At the time of writing (May, 1943) some 350 leucotomies have been performed in Great Britain. In 1942 Freeman published his book, Psychosurgery, dealing with the work done up to the end of 1941. Most of the work dealt with in the present review has been published since then, although for the sake of completeness Freeman's book will be referred to.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 90 , Issue 378 , January 1944 , pp. 486 - 500
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1944 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alexander, G. L. (1943), J. Ment. Sci., 89, 187.Google Scholar
Alford, L. B. (1943), Psychosom. Med., 5, 15.Google Scholar
Bailey, P., and Bremer, F. (1938), J. Neurophysiol., 1, 405.Google Scholar
Banay, R. S., and Davidoff, L. (1942), J. Crim. Psychopath., 3, 59.Google Scholar
Brody, M. B., and Hutton, E. L. (1942). Tests obtainable from The Secretary, R.M.P.A., 11, Cbandos Street, Cavendish Square, London, W.1.Google Scholar
Carmichael, F. A. and jun, F. A. (1942), J. Kansas Med. Soc., 43, 200.Google Scholar
Carse, J. (1943), personal communication.Google Scholar
Cohen, L. H., Novick, R. G., and Ettleston, A. (1942), Psychosotn. Med., 4, 96.Google Scholar
Cook, L. C. (1943), J. Ment. Sci., 89, 188.Google Scholar
Dax, E. C., and Radley Smith, E. J. (1943), J. Ment. Sci., 89, 182.Google Scholar
Drake, R. L., and Hibbard, J. S. (1942), Kansas Med. Soc. J., 48, 345.Google Scholar
Elfeld, P. F. (1942), Delaware St. Med. J., 14, 81.Google Scholar
Epstein, M. A., and Morgan, C. T. (1943), J. Ex. Psychol., 32, 453.Google Scholar
Finan, L. J. (1942), Am. J. Psychol., 55, 202.Google Scholar
Fleming, G. W. T. H. (1942), J. Ment. Sci., 88, 282.Google Scholar
Idem and McKissock, W. (1943), Lancet, i, 361.Google Scholar
Flothow, P. G., and Lemere, F. (1943), West. J. Surg. Ob. Gyn., 51, 1.Google Scholar
Freeman, W. (1942), Psychosurgery. Baltimore: C. J. Thomas.Google Scholar
Idem and Watts, J. W. (1942), Dis. Nerv. Syst., 8, 6.Google Scholar
Idem (1943a), Am. J. Psychiat., 99, 798.Google Scholar
Idem (1943b), personal communication.Google Scholar
Fulton, J. E. (1938), The Physiology of the Nervous System. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldby, F. (1943), J. Anat., 77, 195.Google Scholar
Goldstein, K. (1942), After-effects of Brain Injuries in War. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Golla, F. L. (1943), J. Ment. Sci., 89, 189.Google Scholar
Le Gros Clark, W. E., and Russell, D. S. (1940), J. Neur. Psychiat., 3, 123.Google Scholar
Harlow, H. F., and DAGNON, J. (1943), J. Ex. Psychol., 82, 351.Google Scholar
Harlow, H. F., and Johnson, T. (1943), ibid., 32, 495.Google Scholar
Hebb, D. O. (1941), J. Gen. Psychol., 25, 257.Google Scholar
Heilbrunn, G., and Hletko, P. (1943), Am. J. Psychiat., 99, 569.Google Scholar
Hunt, T. (1942), see Freeman's Psychosurgery, p. 164.Google Scholar
Hutton, E. L. (1942), J. Ment. Sci., 88, 275.Google Scholar
Idem (1943), personal communication.Google Scholar
Idem, Fleming, G. W. T. H., and Fox, F. E. (1941), Lancet, ii, 3.Google Scholar
Klopfer, B., and Miale, F. (1938), Rorschach Res. Exch., 2, 126.Google Scholar
Klopfer, B., and Tallman, G. (1938), ibid., 3, 31.Google Scholar
Lima, A. (1943), personal communication.Google Scholar
Lyerly, J. G. (1942), J.A.M.A., 117, 518.Google Scholar
McKissock, W. (1943a), J. Ment. Sci., 89, 194.Google Scholar
Idem (1943b), personal communication.Google Scholar
Idem (1943c), personal communication.Google Scholar
Malmo, R. B., and Kleinfasser, A. J. (1942), Psychol. Bull., 39, 492.Google Scholar
Morgan, C. T., and Wood, W. M. (1943), J. Neurophysiol., 6, 173.Google Scholar
Rees, T. P. (1943), J. Ment. Sci., 89, 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, C. P., and Hawkes, C. D. (1939), J. Neur. Psychiat., 2, 231.Google Scholar
Shenkin, D. A., and Ruch, T. C. (1943), Arch. Neur. Psychiat., 49, 780.Google Scholar
Smith, K. O. (1942), Psychol. Bull., 39, 493.Google Scholar
Spaet, T., and Harlow, H. F. (1943), J. Ex. Psychol., 32, 424.Google Scholar
Stern, K. (1939), Brain, 82, 157.Google Scholar
Strasburger, E. H. (1941), Mschr. Psychiat. Neur., 104, 78.Google Scholar
Ström-Olsen, R., Last, S. L., Brody, M. B., and Knight, G. C. (1943), J. Ment. Sci., 89, 1.Google Scholar
Tallman, G., and Klopfer, B. (1937), Rorschach Res. Exch., 1, 77.Google Scholar
Tarumianz, (1941), J.A.M.A., 117, 517.Google Scholar
Walker, A. E. (1938), The Primate Thalamus. Chicago.Google Scholar
Idem (1940), J. Comp. Neur., 73, 87.Google Scholar
Waller, W. H. (1940), ibid., 73, 117.Google Scholar
Warden, C. J., Barrera, C. E., and Galt, W. (1942), J. Comp. Psychol., 34, 149.Google Scholar
Watts, J. W., and Freeman, W. (1942), J. Internat Coll. Surg., 5, 233.Google Scholar
Willway, F. W. (1943), J. Ment. Sci., 89, 192.Google Scholar
Wynegar, D. E. (1942), Delaware St. Med. J., 14, 96.Google Scholar
Yacorzynski, G. K., and Davis, L. (1942), Psychol. Bull., 39, 493.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.