Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-gs9qr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T15:41:35.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Primitive forms of Response to the Matrices Test

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

D. B. Bromley
D. B. Bromley*
Affiliation:
The University of Liverpool
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I. Problem and Method.

Recent work on the psychology of intelligence and thinking suggests that perceptual types of intelligence tests are inadequate for dealing with psychiatric cases, young children, old people, mental defectives, and primitive peoples. The argument is that, in these groups, intellectual processes have either deteriorated from or failed to develop to that level with which most perceptual intelligence tests are concerned. The methods of scoring also assume that the correct answers are always reached in the same way, but this is by no means always the case, as Goldstein and Scheerer (1941, p. 14) have pointed out. The studies of Werner (1948), Piaget (1951), Goldstein (1940), Hanfmann and Kasanin (1942), Rapaport (1951), Moursy (1952) et al. show convincing evidence that cognition can take place at different “levels.” The exact determination of the number, nature, and scope of the different levels remains a task for the future, since the present situation is confused, to say the least.

Information

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 99 , Issue 416 , July 1953 , pp. 374 - 393
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1953 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Eysenck, M. D., “A Study of Certain Qualitative Aspects of Problem-solving in Senile-dementia Patients,” J. Ment. Sci., 1945, 91, 337–345.Google Scholar
Goldstein, K., Human Nature in the Light of Psychopathology, 1940. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Idem and Scheerer, M., “Abstract and Concrete Behaviour,” Psychol. Monog., 1941, 53, 239.Google Scholar
Hanfmann, E., and Kasanin, J., “Conceptual Thinking in Schizophrenia,” Nerv. Ment. Dis. Mon. Ser., 1942, 67, N.Y. Google Scholar
Hearnshaw, L. S., “Exploring the Intellect,” Brit. J. Psychol., 1951, 42, 315–321.Google Scholar
Katz, D., Gestalt Psychology, 1951. Methuen.Google Scholar
Luchins, A. S., “Mechanization in Problem-solving,” Psychol. Monog., 1942, 54, 6.Google Scholar
Miller, F. M., and Raven, J. C., “The Influence of Positional Factors on the Choice of Answers to Perceptual Intelligence Tests,” Brit. J. Med. Psychol., 1939, 18, 35–39.Google Scholar
Moursy, E. M., “The Hierarchical Organization of Cognitive Levels,” Brit. J. Psychol. (Stat. Sec.), 1952, 5, iii, 151–180.Google Scholar
Penrose, L. S., and Raven, J. C., “A New Series of Perceptual Tests,” Brit. J. Med. Psychol., 1937, 16, Pt. 2, 97–104.Google Scholar
Piaget, J., Play, Dreams, and Imitation in Childhood, 1951. London, Heineman.Google Scholar
Pinkerton, P., and Kelly, J., “An Attempted Correlation between Clinical and Psychometric Findings in Senile-arteriosclerotic Dementia,” J. Ment. Sci., 1952, 98, 411, 244–255.Google Scholar
Rapaport, D., (Ed.), Organization and Pathology of Thought, 1951. Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Rashkis, H. A., “Three Types of Thinking Disorder,” J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 1947, 106, 6, 650–670.Google Scholar
Raven, J. C., Progressive Matrices, Sets A, B, C, D, and E, 1938. H. K. Lewis & Co. Google Scholar
Idem , “The R.E.C.I. Series of Perceptual Tests,” Brit. J. Med. Psychol., 1939, 18, Pt. I, 16–34.Google Scholar
Idem, Guide to Using Progressive Matrices (1938), 1950. H. K. Lewis & Co. Google Scholar
Spearman, C., The Nature of “Intelligence” and the Principles of Cognition, 1927. MacMillan.Google Scholar
Idem, The Abilities of Man, 1932. MacMillan.Google Scholar
Idem and Wynn Jones, LL, Human Ability, 1950. MacMillan.Google Scholar
Welford, A. T., Skill and Age, 1951. Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Werner, H., Comparative Psychology of Mental Development, 1948. Follett.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.