Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Aviation Approach Charts in an iPad® World

  • William A. Tuccio (a1)
Abstract

The process used to create charted depictions of aviation instrument approach procedures in the United States is examined. The rapid growth of iPad®-like mobile technologies is discussed relative to the historical context of chart implementation. Notional new methods of electronic chart generation are introduced, demonstrating both the functional possibilities and concerns not directly addressed by existing regulation for private aircraft operators. These concerns suggest a ‘yin-yang’ of the stifling of innovation versus the creation of latent safety hazards. The article concludes by recommending regulatory oversight review of approach chart implementation. A glossary of terms is included at the end of this paper. The facts, analysis, and opinions offered in this article represent an independent effort of the author and do not reflect the opinions of any academic institution or government agency. The author also has a limited financial interest in certain iOS® applications.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Aviation Approach Charts in an iPad® World
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Aviation Approach Charts in an iPad® World
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Aviation Approach Charts in an iPad® World
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
(E-mail: william.tuccio@my.erau.edu)
References
Hide All
Adamski, A. J. and Doyle, T. J. (2005). Introduction to the Aviation Regulatory Process. Hayden-McNeil: Plymouth, Michigan.
ARINC. (2012). http://www.arinc.com. Accessed 9 June 2012.
Anderson, F. (2011). Aeronautical Charting Program Background and Challenges. Powerpoint presentation at the Digital Chart Agent Industry Meeting 13 December 2011, Maryland, USA.
Bayram, K., Hankers, T., Zimmer, N., Schiefele, J. and Hecker, P. (2011). Situation Awareness Through the Integration of Transient Information into Future Cockpit Taxi Guidance. Proceedings of the 30th IEEE/AIAA Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), Seattle, WA.
CFR [Code of Federal Regulations]. (2012). http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collectionCfr.action?collectionCode=CFR. Accessed 9 June 2012.
Chandra, D. C., Yeh, M. and Donovan, C. (2007). Pilot Identification of Proposed Electronic Symbols for Displays of Aeronautical Charting Information. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (HFES) 51st Annual Meeting, Baltimore, MD.
FAA AeroNav. (2012). Digital Products. http://aeronav.faa.gov/index.asp?xml=aeronav/applications. Accessed 12 January 2012.
FAA. (2003). Guidelines for the Certification, Airworthiness, and Operational Approval of Electronic Flight Bag. Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC.
FAA. (2007). Advisory Circular 91-78 Use of Class 1 or Class 2 Electronic Flight Bag (EFB). Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC.
FAA. (2009). Order 8260.19D Flight Procedures and Airspace. Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC.
FAA. (2010a). Nav Lean: Instrument Flight Procedures: Navigation (NAV) Procedures Project Final Report. Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC.
FAA. (2010b). Safety Management Systems for Aviation Service Providers. Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC.
FAA. (2011a). Destination2025. Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC.
FAA. (2011b). NextGen Implementation Plan March 2011. Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC.
FAA. (2012). Advisory Circular 120-76B Guidelines for the Certification, Airworthiness, and Operational Use of Portable Electronic Flight Bags. Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC.
Federal Aviation Agency. (1967). AC 211-2 Recommended Standards for IFR Aeronautical Charts. Federal Aviation Agency, Washington, DC.
Friedman, T. L. (2007). The World is Flat. Picador, New York, NY.
Hansman, R. J. and Mykityshyn, M. (1995). An Exploratory Survey of Information Requirements for Instrument Approach Charts. Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC.
ICAO. (2009). Annex 4 Aeronautical Charts 11th Edition. International Civil Aviation Committee, Montreal, Canada.
ICAO. (2010). Annex 15 Aeronautical Information Services 13th Edition. International Civil Aviation Committee, Montreal, Canada.
Innovation Analysis Group. (2010). Electronic Flight Bag - A View from Lufthansa. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nx0OWjk7gmo. Accesses 10 June 2012.
Instrument Procedures Group. (1998). Two Procedures on the Same IAP Chart (ILS & Localizer). Government/Industry Aeronautical Charting Forum. http://www.faa.gov/about/office%5Forg/headquarters%5Foffices/avs/offices/afs/afs400/afs420/acfipg/closed/media/Hist%2098-01-208.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2012.
Instrument Procedures Group. (2010). Official Source for Charting Fix Makeup. Aeronautical Charting Forum. http://www.faa.gov/about/office%5Forg/headquarters%5Foffices/avs/offices/afs/afs400/afs420/acfipg/closed/media/Hist%2010-01-295.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2012.
Instrument Procedures Subgroup. (1997). Charted Fixes on SIAPs That Have No Apparent Purpose. Government/Industry Aeronautical Charting Forum. http://www.faa.gov/about/office%5Forg/headquarters%5Foffices/avs/offices/afs/afs400/afs420/acfipg/closed/media/Hist%2097-01-182.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2012.
Jobs, S. (2011). Keynote Address. Proceedings of Apple Worldwide Developer Conference (WWDC), San Francisco, CA.
Kelly, W. E. and Painter, J. H. (2006). Flight Segment Identification as a Basis for Pilot Advisory Systems. AIAA Journal of Aircraft, 43(6), 16281635.
Lucas, H.D. (2008). Inside the Future: Surviving the Technology Revolution. Praeger, Westport, CT.
Mykityshyn, M. G. (1991). Design and Evaluation of Advanced Electronic Cockpit Displays for Instrument Approach Information. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Norell, H. (2011). End-to-End Connected EFB. Proceedings of Electronic Flight Bag (EFB) Users Forum 2011 November 2–3. Berlin, Germany.
NTSB. (1975). Aircraft Accident Report: Trans World Airlines, Inc. [TWA] Boeing 727-231, N54328, [TWA 514] Berryville, Virginia, December 1, 1974. US National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, DC.
Open Geospatial Consortium. (2011). OGC Making Location Count. http://www.opengeospatial.org. Accessed 12 January 2011.
Pschierer, C. and Schiefele, J. (2007). Open Standards for Airport Databases – ARINC 816. Proceedings of the 26th IEEE/AIAA Digital Avionics Systems Conferenc. DASC 2007.
Ritter, A. (2011). Ground Air Catalink Communication. Proceedings of Electronic Flight Bag (EFB) Users Forum, 2011 November 2–3. Berlin, Germany.
RTCA. (2012). http://www.rtca.org/. Accessed 9 June 2012.
Secretan, E. (2011). Standard vs. Enhanced Digital Products. Proceedings of Digital Chart Agent Industry Meeting 13 December 2011. Maryland, USA.
SESAR [Single European Sky Air Traffic Management Research Program]. (2012). http://www.eurocontrol.int/content/sesar-and-research. Accessed 14 January 2012.
Skaves, P. (2011). Electronic Flight Bag (EFB) Policy and Guidance. Proceedings of the 30th IEEE/AIAA Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), Seattle, WA.
Stauffer, J. (2011). Graphics, Media, and Games Kickoff. Proceedings of Apple Worldwide Developer Conference (WWDC), San Francisco, CA.
Stolzer, A. J., Halford, C. D. and Goglia, J. J. (2008). Safety Management Systems in Aviation. Ashgate, Burlington, VT.
Sullivan, D. (2011). Pre-Proposed Digital Pricing Methodology (Powerpoint presentation). Proceedings of Digital Chart Agent Industry Meeting 13 December 2011, Maryland, USA.
USC [United States Code]. (2012). http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collectionUScode.action?collectionCode=USCODE. Accessed 9 June 2012.
Zimmer, N., Schiefele, J., Bayram, K., Hankers, T., Frank, S. and Feuerle, T. (2011). Rule-Based NOTAM & Weather Notification. Proceedings of Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveilance Conference (ICNS). Herndon, VA.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Journal of Navigation
  • ISSN: 0373-4633
  • EISSN: 1469-7785
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-navigation
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 9
Total number of PDF views: 68 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 188 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th May 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.