Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-9b74x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-01T01:36:03.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Collision Avoidance, Driver Support and Safety Intervention Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2009

Simon P. Gilling
Simon P. Gilling
Affiliation:
(Rover Group UK)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Autonomous Intelligent Cruise Control (AICC) will be marketed by a number of vehicle manufacturers before the end of the decade. This paper will describe AICC and the next generation systems currently being developed and validated within the EC Fourth Framework project, Anti-Collision Autonomous Support and Safety Intervention SysTem (AC ASSIST).

The currently available cruise control systems which maintain a fixed speed are a well-known form of longitudinal driver support. The fixed speed cruise control becomes less useful with increased traffic volumes, as the driver must disable the system when a slower preceding vehicle is encountered.

Keywords

1. Land navigation.2. Collision avoidance.3. Cruise control.4. Intervention systems.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , January 1997 , pp. 27 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1Lansdown, M. Fowkes. An investigation into the utility of various metrics for the evaluation of driver information systems.Google Scholar
2PROMETHEUS PRO-GEN Workshop. Klockner, J., BASt. In-depth analysis of accidents.Google Scholar
3Knipling, et al. (1993). Rear-end collisions: problem size assessment and statistical description. National Traffic Safety Administration Report DOT HS 8O7 994, pp. ES1–ES3.Google Scholar
4Knipling, and Hsiao-Ming, Y. (1991). IVHS crash avoidance countermeasure, target crash problem size assessment and statistical description. National Traffic Safety Administration Report DOT, Office of Crash Avoidance Research.Google Scholar
5Knipling, et al. (1993). Assessment of IVHS countermeasures for collision avoidance: rear-end collisions. National Traffic Safety Administration Report DOT HS 807 995, p. ES2.Google Scholar
6Brusaglino, , Kremer, U. and Schlussle, R. Anti-collision systems: a main concern of the EUREKA project PROMETHEUS.Google Scholar