Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T14:30:45.669Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Feasibility Study on a Regional Navigation Transceiver System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2008

Byungwoon Park
Affiliation:
(Seoul National University)
Doyoon Kim
Affiliation:
(Seoul National University)
Taikjin Lee
Affiliation:
(Seoul National University)
Changdon Kee
Affiliation:
(Seoul National University)
Boksoo Paik*
Affiliation:
(Agency for Defense Development of Korea)
Kihoon Lee*
Affiliation:
(Agency for Defense Development of Korea)

Abstract

This paper proposes an airborne transceiver system as an alternative navigation system and a triangulation method using bidirectional range measurements as a method of transceiver position determination. We suggest several system arrays that can estimate each mobile transceiver position in real time. We found that our suggested alternative navigation system working in a 700 km×900 km region is feasible using only 10 transceivers at an altitude of 42 km, furthermore its performance can compete with that of Galileo's Open Service. This paper will contribute to the establishment of an alternative or backup navigation system with modest expenditure and a short development period, and which is independent of GPS.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dai, L et al. (2001) Inverted pseudolite positioning and its applications. Survey Review, 36(286): pp 602611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovach, K (2000) New User Equivalent Range Error (UERE) Budget for the Modernized Navstar Global Positioning System (GPS). In: Proceedings of The Institute of Navigation National Technical Meeting, Anaheim, CA: The Institute of Navigation, pp 21302139.Google Scholar
LeMaster, E.A. et al. (2002) Field Demonstration of a Mars Navigation System Utilizing GPS Pseudolite Transceivers. In: 2002 IEEE Position, Location, and Navigation Symposium, Palm Springs, CA: pp 150155.Google Scholar
Matsuoka, M et al. (2004) Rover, go your own way. GPS World Magazine, June pp 1422.Google Scholar
Misra, P, Enge, P (2001) Global Positioning System – Signals, Measurements, and Performance. Ganga-Jamura Press, Massachusetts, pp 123250.Google Scholar
Parkinson, B (1996) Global Positioning System: Theory and Applications. Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, Washington DC, pp 409545.Google Scholar
Raquet, J. et al. (1995) Development and testing of a mobile pseudolite concept for precise positioning, 8th Int. Tech. Meeting of the Satellite Division of the U.S. Inst. of Navigation, Palm Springs, California, 12–15 Sept., pp 817825.Google Scholar
Stone, J et al. (1999) GPS Pseudolite Transceivers and their Applications. In: Proceedings of the Institute of Navigation National Technical Meeting, San Diego, CA: The Institute of Navigation, pp 15091515.Google Scholar
Tsujii, T et al. (2002) A Preliminary Test of the Pseudolite-Based Inverted GPS Positioning in Kinematic Mode. In: 2nd Symp. on Geodesy for Geotechnical & Structural Applications, Berlin, Germany, pp 442451.Google Scholar
Tuohino, JL et al. (2000) Military Pseudolite Flight Test Results. In: Proceedings of the Institute of Navigation GPS-2000, Salt Lake City, UT: The Institute of Navigation, pp 20792088.Google Scholar