Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T10:21:38.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Geometry of Elliptical Probability Contours for a Fix using Multiple Lines of Position

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2019

W.R.B. Lionheart Open the ORCID record for W.R.B. Lionheart [Opens in a new window] ,
P.J.C. Moses  and
C. Kimberling
W.R.B. Lionheart*
Affiliation:
(University of Manchester, UK)
P.J.C. Moses
Affiliation:
(Moparmatic Co., Redditch, UK)
C. Kimberling
Affiliation:
(University of Evansville, Indiana, USA)
*
(E-mail: bill.lionheart@manchester.ac.uk)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Navigation methods, traditional and modern, use lines of position in the plane. Standard Gaussian assumptions about errors leads to a constant sum of squared distances from the lines defining a probability contour. It is well known these contours are a family of ellipses centred on the most probable position and they can be computed using algebraic methods. In this paper we show how the most probable position, the axes and foci of ellipses can be found using geometric methods. This results in a ruler and compasses construction of these points and this gives insight into the way the shape and orientation of the probability contours depend on the angles between the lines of position. We start with the classical case of three lines of position with equal variances, we show how this can be extended to the case where the variances in the errors in the lines of position differ, and we go on to consider the case of four lines of position using a methodology that generalises to an arbitrary number of lines.

Keywords

NavigationOptimisationMaximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE)Sextant
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 73 , Issue 2 , March 2020 , pp. 398 - 420
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bilo, J. (1987). Over een bundel homothetische ellipsen om het punt van Lemoine. Nieuw Tijdschrift voor Wiskunde, 74, 103–110.Google Scholar
Björck, , Å, . (2015). Numerical methods in matrix computations, volume 59. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burch, D. and Miller, S. (2014). Hawaii by Sextant: An In-Depth Exercise in Celestial Navigation Using Real Sextant Sights and Logbook Entries. Starpath Publications.Google Scholar
Coolidge, J.L. (1913). Two geometrical applications of the method of least squares. The American Mathematical Monthly, 20(6), 187–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coxeter, H.S.M. and Greitzer, S.L. (1967). Geometry Revisited. Mathematical Association of America.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, A. (1952). Astronomical refraction at low altitudes in marine navigation. The Journal of Navigation, 5(4), 307–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golub, G.H. and C.F., Van Loan (1996). Matrix Computations. Johns Hopkins Studies in the Mathematical Sciences. Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996. ISBN 9780801854149.Google Scholar
Gordon, R.B. (1964). The attainment of precision in celestial navigation. The Journal of Navigation, 17(2), 125–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hohenwarter, M. (2018). Geogebra, version 6.0.498.0. https://www.geogebra.org/Google Scholar
Honsberger, R. (1995). Episodes in nineteenth and twentieth century Euclidean geometryvolume 37. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimberling, C. (1994). Central points and central lines in the plane of a triangle. Mathematics Magazine, 67(3), 163–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimberling, C. (2018). Encyclopedia of Triangle Centers. http://faculty.evansville.edu/ck6/encyclopedia/ETC.htmlGoogle Scholar
Morling, K. (2010). Geometric and Engineering Drawing. Elsevier, London, 3rd edition.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moses, P.J.C. and Kimberling, C. (2007). Intersections of lines and circles. Missouri Journal of Mathematical Science, 19, 176–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royal Navy. (1938). Admiralty Manual of Navigation. His Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Ostermann, A. and Wanner, G. (2012). Geometry by Its History. Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, B.C. (1952). Some observations of refraction at low altitudes and of astronomical position-line accuracy. The Journal of Navigation, 5(1), 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadek, J. (2017). Isogonal conjugates in an n-simplex. Forum Geometricorum, 17, 425–432.Google Scholar
Sadek, J., Bani-Yaghoub, M. and Rhee, N.H. (2016). Isogonal conjugates in a tetrahedron. Forum Geometricorum, 16, 43–50.Google Scholar
Shufeldt, H.H. (1962). Precision celestial navigation experiments. The Journal of Navigation, 15(3), 301–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stansfield, R.G. (1947). Statistical theory of DF fixing. Journal of the Institution of Electrical Engineers-Part IIIA: Radiocommunication, 94(15), 762–770.Google Scholar
Stewart, I.N. (2015). Galois Theory. T&F/CRC Press. ISBN 9781482245820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart, R.G. (2019). Probabilities in a Gaussian cocked hat. The Journal of Navigation. doi:10.1017/S0373463319000110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thas, C. (2003). A generalization of the Lemoine point. Forum Geometricorum, 3, 161–167.Google Scholar
van Tienhoven, C. (2018). Encyclopedia of Quadri-Figures. https://chrisvantienhoven.nl/mathematics/encyclopedia.Google Scholar
van Tienhoven, C. (2019) Encyclopedia of Polygon Geometry. https://chrisvantienhoven.nl/mathematics/encyclopedia-of-poly-geometry.Google Scholar
Whitworth, W.A. (1866). Trilinear coordinates and other methods of modern analytical geometry of two dimensions: an elementary treatise. Deighton.Google Scholar
Yvon-Villarceau, A.J.F. and Aved de Magnac, H.J. (1877). Nouvelle navigation astronomique. Gauthier-Villars, Paris.Google Scholar