No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Navigation Chart Design
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 1985
Extract
During the XIIth International Hydrographic Conference, held at Monaco in 1982, Anderson and this writer discussed Communication of the Nautical Chart. In that paper they traced the historical development of the nautical chart, noting how it had evolved and that features of the chart today had resulted more by evolution than by actual design. They noted, for instance, that although present-day charts are often produced by computer and make limited use of colour, they are not significantly different from charts produced some two hundred years ago. Computer methods have been used primarily to copy the work that was carried out so skilfully by the draughtsmen of earlier years. The authors after examining the historical development of the chart then touched lightly on some particular Canadian problems and went on to discuss the first principles of chart design. In particular they suggested that modern cartographic communications research might offer some help in developing the future design of the nautical chart. This paper is therefore a sequel to that work and is directed to presenting some ideas and furthering the discussion.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1985
References
REFERENCES
1Kerr, A. J. and Anderson, N. M. (1983). Communication and the Nautical Chart. This Journal, 35, 439.Google Scholar
2Newson, D. W. (1983). International Standardisation of Nautical Charts. Proceedings of the Conference of Commonwealth Surveyors. Paper no. E4, 16 pp.Google Scholar
3Perrotte, R. (1984). A methodological approach to nautical chart design. International Hydrographic Review, 56 (1), 110–119.Google Scholar
4Eaton, R. M., Anderson, N. M. and Evangelatos, T. V., (1984). The Electronic chart. To be presented at the 2nd Int. Hydrog. Tech. Conf., Plymouth, September 1984.Google Scholar
5Salichtchev, K. A. (1983). Cartographic Communication, A Theoretical Survey: Graphic Communication and Design in Contemporary Cartography (ed. Taylor, D. R. F.), p. 11. Wiley.Google Scholar
6Castner, H. W. and McGrath, G. (1982). Preliminary Study of the Design of the Canadian Nautical Chart in Relation to the Chart User's Needs. Contract no. OSC 81–00060 for Department of Fisheries and Oceans, March 1982, 68 pp.Google Scholar
7Bertin, J. (1983). A new look at cartography: Graphic Communication and Design in Contemporary Cartography, p. 69. Wiley.Google Scholar
8Castner, H. W. and McGrath, G. (1983). A new look at cartography: Graphic Communication and Design in Contemporary Cartography, p. 69. Wiley.Google Scholar
9Bertin, J. (1983). A new look at cartography: Graphic Communication and Design in Contemporary Cartography, p. 69. Wiley.Google Scholar
10Benin, J. (1969). Graphique et mathématique: généralisation du traitement graphique de I'information. Annales, Economies, Société, Civilisations, 1, 91.Google Scholar
11 Haslam, D. W. (1984). Contract hydrography. National Ocean Service Hydrographic Conference, Rockville, Md, April 1984.Google Scholar
12 Nordco Ltd. (1984). Canadian fishermen's chart no. 41065 A 84, 1st ed., 1: 250000, St John's, Newfoundland.Google Scholar
13Kerr, A. J. (1976). Chart design considerations for the navigators of today and tomorrow. International Hydrographic Review 53 (1), 129–136.Google Scholar
14Kerr, A. J. (1976). Chart design considerations for the navigators of today and tomorrow. International Hydrographic Review 53 (1), 129–136.Google Scholar
15Wright, A. J. (1980). An Alternative system for chart information. Hydrographic Journal, no. 17, April 1980, 13–18.Google Scholar
16Imhof, E. (1982). Cartographic Relief Presentation. Berlin, New York:Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Laughton, A. S., Whitmarch, R. B. and Jones, S. (1970). Anaglyph map. Red Sea discussion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, A. 267, 1187.Google Scholar
18Lawson, S. (1983). The Significance of colour for the navigation chart. Hydrographic Journal, no. 30.Google Scholar
19Robinson, A. H. (1967). Psychological aspects of color in cartography. Internationales Jahbruchjur Kartographie, 7 (1967). C. Bertelsmann Verlag, Gutersloh, 50–61.Google Scholar
20Imhof, E. (1982). Psychological aspects of color in cartography. Internationales Jahbruchjur Kartographie, 7.Google Scholar
21Waters, Trevor L. and Ivergard, Toni, (1983). A study of red and white light on the chart table for navigation at sea. Ergonomics, 26, 349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Robinson, A. H. (1967). A study of red and white light on the chart table for navigation at sea. Ergonomics, 26, 349.Google Scholar
23Lawson, S. (1983). A study of red and white light on the chart table for navigation at sea. Ergonomics, 26, 349.Google Scholar
24Lawson, S. (1983). A study of red and white light on the chart table for navigation at sea. Ergonomics, 26, 349.Google Scholar
25 Marshall, Mackling, Monaghan Ltd. (1982). Recreational–Environmental Map. Blind River. Ontario. Scale 1: 20,000. Produced under contract to Canadian Hydrographic Service.Google Scholar
26 U.S. Department of Commerce and Department of the Interior (1978). Coastal Mapping Handbook, p. 161. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
27Wright, A. J. (1980). A study of red and white light on the chart table for navigation at sea. Ergonomics, 26, 349.Google Scholar
28Coates, R., Dye, K. and Knox, K. (1984). An electronic chart display for fishing vessels. This Journal, 36, 374.Google Scholar
29Eaton, R. M., Anderson, N. M. and Evangelatos, T. V. (1984). An electronic chart display for fishing vessels. This Journal, 36, 374.Google Scholar