Skip to main content Accessibility help

A Novel Process Model for Marine Accident Analysis by using Generic Fuzzy-AHP Algorithm

  • Bekir Sahin (a1) (a2) and Yunus Emre Senol (a1)


Marine accident analysis is a sophisticated and complex official interpretation that requires a professional and fair judgment. For accidents such as a collision, contact and other incidents in the maritime field, the judgment mechanism of the courts depends on the decision process of the field experts. Field experts define the “Fraction Defectives” (FDs) of the vessels for the intended case based on the existing evidence and navigational specifications. However, evaluation of human judgment can be limited and problematic in analysing many aspects of a case. In this paper, a pairwise comparison method is used to simplify and clarify the judgment process. We aim to assess marine accidents in a stepwise approach that is inaccurately carried out in a holistic perspective by the field experts. A real accident that occurred in the past is simulated in front of the field experts. After conducting an expert consultation, FDs are re-calculated to compare both the regular judgment and the results in our suggested Generic Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (GF-AHP) approach.


Corresponding author


Hide All
Aguarón, J. and Moreno-Jiménez, J.M. (2003). The geometric consistency index: Approximated thresholds. European Journal of Operational Research, 147, 137145.
Bellman, R.E. and Zadeh, L.A. (1977). Local and fuzzy logics, Modern Uses of Multiple- Valued Logic, Dunn, J.M. and Epstein, G. (eds.), 103165.
Buckley, J.J. (1985). Fuzzy Hierarchical Analysis. Fuzzy Sets and System, 17, 233247.
Bulut, E., Duru, O., Kececi, T. and Yoshida, S. (2012). Use of consistency index, expert prioritization and direct numerical inputs for generic fuzzy-AHP modeling: A process model for shipping asset management. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(2), 19111923.
Cakir, O. and Canpolat, M.S. (2008). A web-based decision support system for multi-criteria inventory classification using fuzzy AHP methodology. Expert Systems with Applications, 35, 13671378.
Chang, D.Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95, 649655.
COLREGS (1972). [with amendments adopted from December 2009]. Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea. London: International Maritime Organization.
Crawford, G. and Williams, C. (1985). A note on the analysis of subjective judgment matrices. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 29, 387405.
Duru, O., Bulut, E. and Yoshida, S. (2012). Regime switching fuzzy AHP model for choice-varying priorities problem and expert consistency prioritization: A cubic fuzzy-priority matrix design. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 49544964.
Laarhoven, P.J.M. and Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11, 229241.
Lee, M., Pham, H. and Zhang, X. (1999). A methodology for priority setting with application to software development process. European Journal of Operational Research, 118, 375389.
Leung, L.C. and Cao, D. (2000). On consistency and ranking of alternatives in fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 124, 102113.
Saaty, T.L. and Vargas, L.G. (1987). Uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 32, 107117.
Saaty, T.L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw- Hill.
Weck, M., Klocke, F., Schell, H. and Ruenauver, E. (1997). Evaluating alternative production cycles using the extended fuzzy AHP method. European Journal of Operational Research, 100, 351366.
Zadeh, L.A. (1975). The concept of linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I. Information Sciences, 8, 199249.
Zadeh, L.A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338353.


Related content

Powered by UNSILO

A Novel Process Model for Marine Accident Analysis by using Generic Fuzzy-AHP Algorithm

  • Bekir Sahin (a1) (a2) and Yunus Emre Senol (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.