Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Receiver Interface Requirements for Deep INS/GNSS Integration and Vector Tracking

  • Paul D Groves (a1) and Christopher J Mather (a1)

Vector tracking of global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) signals and deeply integrating GNSS with an inertial navigation system (INS) improve robustness and accuracy in poor GNSS signal-to-noise environments. Both require a dedicated interface between the GNSS receiver and the navigation processor to enable the GNSS receiver to output the correlator measurements and input numerically-controlled oscillator (NCO) commands. This paper investigates the requirements for such an interface. Data latency is analysed for a range of different stand-alone GNSS vector tracking and deep INS/GNSS integration architectures. Suitable latency compensation techniques are identified. It is shown that, for the majority of applications, an NCO command update rate of 50 Hz with latency compensation and 100 Hz without is sufficient. An approach to interface standardisation which can handle a wide range of different GNSS signals and receiver designs is proposed.

Corresponding author
Hide All
[1]Misra P. and Enge P., Global Positioning System: Signals, Measurements, and Performance, 2nd edition, Ganga-Jamuna Press, 2006.
[2]Van Dierendonck A. J., “GPS Receivers,” In Global Positioning System: Theory and Applications Volume I, pp. 329407, Parkinson B. W. and Spilker J. J. (eds), AIAA, 1996.
[3]Groves P. D., Principles of GNSS, Inertial and Multi-Sensor Integrated Navigation Systems, Artech House, January 2008.
[4]Bullock J. B. et al. , “Integration of GPS with Other Sensors and Network Assistance,” In Understanding GPS Principles and Applications, Second Edition, pp. 459558, Kaplan E. D. and Hegarty C. J. (eds), Norwood, MA: Artech House, 2006.
[5]Spilker J J Jr, Vector Delay Lock Loop Processing of Radiolocation Transmitter Signals, U. S. Patent 5,398,034, 1995.
[6]Pany T and Eissfeller B, “Use of a Vector Delay Lock Loop Receiver for GNSS Signal Power Analysis in Bad Signal Conditions,” Proc. IEEE/ION PLANS, April 2006.
[7]Kiesel S, Held M H and Trommer G F, “Realization of a Deeply Coupled GPS/INS Navigation System Based on INS-VDLL Integration,” Proc. ION National Technical Meeting, January 2007.
[8]Sennott J and Senffner D, “A GPS Carrier Phase Processor for Real-Time High Dynamics Tracking,” Proc. ION 53rd Annual Meeting, June 1997.
[9]Titterton D H and Weston J L, Strapdown Inertial Navigation Technology, 2nd edition, IEE, 2004.
[10]Gebre-Egziabher D., “What is the difference between ‘loose’, ‘tight’, ‘ultra-tight’ and ‘deep’ integration strategies for INS and GNSS?” Inside GNSS magazine, Jan/ Feb 2007.
[11]Schmidt G. and Phillips R. (“INS/GPS Integration Architectures,” Low-Cost Navigation Sensors and Integration Technology, NATO RTO Lecture Series, October 2008 (original version published in 1996).
[12]Groves P. D., Mather C. J., and Macaulay A. A., “Demonstration of non-coherent deep INS/GPS integration for optimized signal to noise performance,” Proc. ION GNSS 2007, Fort Worth, TX, September 2007.
[13]Buck T. M., Wilmore J. and Cook M. J., “A High G, MEMS Based, Deeply Integrated, INS/GPS, Guidance, Navigation and Control Flight Management Unit,” Proc. IEEE/ION PLANS, April 2006.
[14]Soloviev A., van Graas F. and Gunawardena S., “Implementation of Deeply Integrated GPS/Low-Cost IMU for Reacquisition and Tracking of Low CNR GPS Signals,” Proc. ION NTM, January 2004.
[15]Hodgart M. S., Blunt P. D. and Unwin M., “The Optimal Dual Estimate Solution for Robust Tracking of Binary Offset Carrier (BOC) Modulation,” Proc. ION GNSS 2007, Fort Worth, TX, September 2007, pp. 10171027.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Journal of Navigation
  • ISSN: 0373-4633
  • EISSN: 1469-7785
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-navigation
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 25 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 92 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.