Skip to main content
×
×
Home

A Systematic Approach for Collision Risk Analysis based on AIS Data

  • Weibin Zhang (a1) (a2), Cole Kopca (a2), Jinjun Tang (a3), Dongfang Ma (a4) and Yinhai Wang (a2)...
Abstract

Ship collision risk is an important aspect of ship navigation safety. A systematic method to assess collision risk by monitoring parameter states continually is necessary and has proven effective. Another important factor in risk assessment is ship size, but the effect of the size of ship pairs has not been considered properly in many previous studies. This research utilises a systematic perspective to study collision risk of near-misses in ship-ship encounters. This fills a secondary research gap where previous risk assessments only investigated near-misses from the perspective of a single vessel. Following this proposed approach, ship pair encounter states can be continually tracked. Ultimately, a method of improved Vessel Collision Risk Operator (VCRO) to merge risk assessments of both ships is proposed through integration of near-miss collision risks in a systematic way, which overcomes the disadvantages of prior VCROs that only consider the maximum value, from which it is difficult to track and judge the risk trend. Utilising a case study, the effectiveness of the proposed method is validated through analysis of ship encounters, with ships of different sizes in the Baltic Sea.

Copyright
Corresponding author
(E-mail: yinhai@uw.edu)
References
Hide All
Brown, M.J. (2012). John Dewey's logic of science. HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, 2, 258306.
Bukhari, A.C., Tusseyeva, I. and Kim, Y-G. (2013). An Intelligent Real-Time Multi-Vessel Collision Risk Assessment System from VTS View Point Based on Fuzzy Inference System. Expert Systems with Applications, 40, 1220–30.
Chauvin, C. and Lardjane, S. (2008). Decision Making and Strategies in an Interaction Situation: Collision Avoidance at Sea. Transportation Research Part F, 11, 259–69.
Debnath, A.K. and Chin, H.C. (2010). Navigational Traffic Conflict Technique: A Proactive Approach to Quantitative Measurement of Collision Risks in Port Waters. Journal of Navigation, 63(1), 137–52.
Delgado, M., Gomez-Skarmeta, A.F. and Martin, F. (1997). A Fuzzy Clustering-Based Rapid Prototyping for Fuzzy Rule-Based Modeling. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 5(2), 223233.
Goerlandt, F. and Montewka, J. (2015a). A Framework for Risk Analysis of Maritime Transportation Sytems: A Case Study for Oil Spill from Tankers in a Ship-Ship Collision. Safety Science, 76, 4266.
Goerlandt, F., Montewka, J., Kuzmin, V. and Kujala, P. (2015). A risk-informed ship collision alert system: Framework and application. Safety Science, 77, 182204.
Goerlandt, F. and Montewka, J. (2015b). Maritime Transportation Risk Analysis: Review and Analysis in Light of Some Foundational Issues. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 138, 115–34.
Goodwin, E.M. (1975). A statistical study of ship domains. The Journal of Navigation, 28(03), 328344.
Harati-Mokhtari, A., Wall, A., Brooks, P. and Wang, J. (2007). Automatic Identification System (AIS): Data Reliability and Human Error Implications. The Journal of Navigation, 60(03), 373389.
Hartigan, J.A. and Wong, M.A. (1979). AS136: A K-means clustering algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics), 28(1), 100108.
Kaplan, S. and Garrick, J.B. (1981). On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Analysis, 1(1), 1127.
Kijima, K. and Furukawa, Y. (2003). Automatic collision avoidance system using the concept of blocking area. Proceeding of IFAC Conference on Manoeuvring and Control of Marine Craft, Girona, Spain.
Laureshyn, A., Svensson, Å., and Hydén, C. (2010). Evaluation of traffic safety, based on micro-level behavioural data: theoretical framework and first implementation. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 42(6), 16371646.
Li, S., Meng, Q. and Qu, X. (2012). An Overview of Maritime Waterway Quantitative Risk Assessment Models. Risk Analysis, 32(3), 496512.
Mou, J.M., Tak, C. and Van der Ligteringen, H. (2010). Study on Collision Avoidance in Busy Waterways by Using AIS Data. Ocean Engineering, 37, 483–90.
Qu, X., Meng, Q., and Li, S. (2011). Ship Collision Risk Assessment for the Singapore Strait. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43(6), 2030–36. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2011.05.022.
Setnes, M. (2000). Supervised Fuzzy Clustering for Rule Extraction. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 8(4), 416424.
Tang, J., Liu, F., Zou, Y., Zhang, W. and Wang, Y. (2017). An Improved Fuzzy Neural Network for Traffic Speed Prediction Considering Periodic Characteristic. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, PP(99), 111.
Van Iperen, E. (2012). Detection of Hazardous Encounters at the North Sea from AIS Data. In Proceedings of International Workshop of Next Generation Nautical Traffic Models, 112. Shanghai, China.
Wang, N., Meng, X., Xu, Q. and Wang, Z. (2009). A Unified Analytical Framework for Ship Domains. Journal of Navigation, 62(4), 643–55.
Zhang, W.B., Goerlandt, F., Montewka, J. and Kujala, P. (2015). A Method for detecting possible near-miss ship collisions from AIS data. Ocean Engineering, 107, 6069.
Zhang, W.B., Goerlandt, F., Kujala, P. and Wang, Y.H. (2016). An Advanced Method for Detecting Possible Near-Miss Ship Collisions from AIS Data. Ocean Engineering, 124, 141156.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Journal of Navigation
  • ISSN: 0373-4633
  • EISSN: 1469-7785
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-navigation
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 9
Total number of PDF views: 203 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 627 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 24th May 2017 - 20th August 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.