Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-29T01:30:17.784Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Tanker Navigation Safety System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2009

Brad Judson
Brad Judson
Affiliation:
(GeoInfo Solutions, Victoria, British Columbia)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper summarizes the results of Phase 3 of the Arctic Tanker Risk Analysis Project (ATRA) which provided a prototype Tanker Navigation Safety System (TNSS). TNSS is a ship-board risk management system capable of route planning and decision support based upon a knowledge database. The objective of the project was to provide timely risk assessment information to a mariner or decision-maker in a system capable of integration with existing ECDIS or shipboard PC systems. The historical information was to include: accident location, frequency and type, ice, wind, visibility, environmental sensitivity and other factors. The specifications of the TNSS prototype were expanded so that risk could be assessed for each track in a route plan by applying a predictive accident model patterned after the navigation and collision avoidance process.

Keywords

1. Risk analysis.2. Safety.3. Ice navigation.4. Collision avoidance.5 . Groundings.
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , January 1997 , pp. 97 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Loughnane, D., Judson, B. and Reid, J. (1995). Arctic tanker risk analysis project. In Maritime Policy & Management, vol. 22, no. 1, January–March.Google Scholar
2National Research Council (1981). Research Needs to Reduce Maritime Collisions, Rammings, and Groundings. Washington: National Academy Press. Also Iijima, Ykito and Hayashi, Shogo (1991). Towards a 21st century intelligent ship. This Journal, 44, 184.Google Scholar
3 Visual Basic and Microsoft Access are trademarks of Microsoft Corporation and MapBasic is a registered trademark of Maplnfo Corporation.Google Scholar
4Shortreed, J. and Del Bel Belluz, D. (1996). Arctic Tanker Risk Assessment – Phase 3: Task 5, Review of Risk Analysis Model (TNSS) and Task 7, Evaluation of Risk Control Prototype Software. Waterloo: Institute for Risk Research, University of Waterloo.Google Scholar
5Wells, D., Keinonen, A. and Revill, C. (1993). Analysis of Ice Damages Sustained by ASPPR Type Vessels in the Canadian Arctic 1976 to 1992. Ottawa: Norland Science and Engineering Ltd. and AKAC Inc. for Canadian Coast Guard Northern. TP-11691E.Google Scholar
6Shortreed, J. and Del Bel Belluz, D. (1996). Arctic Tanker Risk Assessment – Phase 3: Task 5, Review of Risk Analysis Model (TNSS) and Task 7, Evaluation of Risk Control Prototype Software. Waterloo: Institute for Risk Research, University of Waterloo.Google Scholar
7Canarctic Shipping Company Ltd (1996). Passage Planning Manual, Arctic Shipping Pollution Prevention Regulations. Ottawa: Arctic Ship Safety, Transport Canada, (in press).Google Scholar
8Karlsen, J. & Kristiansen, S. (1980). Cause Relationships of Collisions and Groundings. Det Norske Veritas Research Division.Google Scholar
9United States. (1995). Casualty Statistics and Investigations: Report of the Correspondence Group on the Casualty Database Construction. London: International Maritime Organization.Google Scholar
10United States. (1995). Casualty Statistics and Investigations: Report of the Correspondence Group on the Casualty Database Construction. London: International Maritime Organization, Annex 2, p. 8.Google Scholar