Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Can Previous Pro-Environmental Behaviours Influence Subsequent Environmental Behaviours? The Licensing Effect of Pro-Environmental Behaviours

  • Liuna Geng (a1), Xiao Cheng (a1), Zhuxuan Tang (a1), Kexin Zhou (a2) and Lijuan Ye (a1)...
Abstract

Methods for promoting individuals’ pro-environmental behaviours are becoming very important. Besides traditional factors relevant to pro-environmental actions, few studies have examined the licensing effect within this domain. Across three studies we have explored whether the licensing effect really exists in pro-environmental behaviours, how this effect actually works, and how to inhibit or even avoid this effect. Results have revealed that previous pro-environmental behaviours lead to a decrease in subsequent pro-environmental behaviours, indicating a licensing effect. Also, the licensing effect in pro-environmental behaviours can be explained by having individuals focus on goal progress and reduced by focusing on goal commitment. Furthermore, attributional recall could be an intervention for mitigating the licensing effect.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Can Previous Pro-Environmental Behaviours Influence Subsequent Environmental Behaviours? The Licensing Effect of Pro-Environmental Behaviours
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Can Previous Pro-Environmental Behaviours Influence Subsequent Environmental Behaviours? The Licensing Effect of Pro-Environmental Behaviours
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Can Previous Pro-Environmental Behaviours Influence Subsequent Environmental Behaviours? The Licensing Effect of Pro-Environmental Behaviours
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Dr Liuna Geng, Department of Psychology, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China. Email: gengliuna@nju.edu.cn
References
Hide All
Ajzen I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Research in Nursing & Health, 14, 137144.
Bargh J.A., Chen M., & Burrows L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230–44.
Barr S., Shaw G., Coles T., & Prillwitz J. (2010). ‘A holiday is a holiday’: Practicing sustainability, home and away. Journal of Transport Geography, 18, 474481.
Berger I.E. (1997). The demographics of recycling and the structure of environmental behaviour. Environment and Behaviour, 29, 515531.
Bolton L.E., Cohen J.B., & Bloom P.N. (2006). Does marketing products as remedies create ‘get out of jail free cards’? Journal of Consumer Research, 33, 7181.
Canuel M., Abdous B., Bélanger D., & Gosselin P. (2014). Development of composite indices to measure the adoption of pro-environmental behaviours across canadian provinces. PLoS One, 9, e101569e101569.
Catlin J.R., & Wang Y. (2012). Recycling gone bad: When the option to recycle increases resource consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23, 122127.
Chartrand T.L., & Bargh J.A. (1996). Automatic activation of impression formation and memorization goals: Nonconscious goal priming reproduces effects of explicit task instructions. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 71, 464478.
Clot S., Grolleau G., & Ibanez L. (2014). Do good deeds make bad people? European Journal of Law and Economics, 123. doi:10.1007/s106570149441-4
Dominicis S.D., Fornara F., Cancellieri U.G., Twigger-Ross C., & Bonaiuto M. (2015). We are at risk, and so what? Place attachment, environmental risk perceptions and preventive coping behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 6678.
Dhar R., & Simonson I. (1999). Making complementary choices in consumption episodes: Highlighting versus balancing. Journal of Marketing Research, 36, 2944.
Festinger L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Fishbach A., & Dhar R. (2005). Goals as excuses or guides: The liberating effect of perceived goal progress on choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 370377.
Fishbach A., Dhar R., & Zhang Y. (2006). Subgoals as substitutes or complements: The role of goal accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 232242.
Fishbach A., Zhang Y., & Koo M. (2009). The dynamics of self-regulation. European Review of Social Psychology, 20, 15344.
Gans J.S., & Groves V. (2009). Carbon offset provision with guilt-ridden consumers. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 21, 243269.
Hautier Y., Tilman D., Isbell F., Seabloom E.W., Borer E.T., & Reich P.B. (2015). Plant ecology. Anthropogenic environmental changes affect ecosystem stability via biodiversity. Science, 348, 336340.
Jordan J., Mullen E., & Murnighan J.K. (2009). Maintaining a less-than-perfect moral equilibrium: The paradoxical effects of past moral behaviour. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Liu J.H., & Bernardo A.B.I. (2014). Social psychology for social change: Foundations for and introduction to a program of action-oriented research. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 8, 2934.
Mazar N., & Zhong C.B. (2010). Do green products make us better people? Psychological Science, 21, 494498.
Meijers M.H.C. (2014). On justifying eco-unfriendly behaviors (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). FMG, Amsterdam School of Communication Research, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Merritt A.C., Effron D.A., & Benoît M. (2010). Moral self-licensing: When being good frees us to be bad. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 344357.
Monin B. & Miller D.T. (2001). Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 3343.
Mukhopadhyay A., Sengupta J., & Ramanathan S. (2008). Recalling past temptations: An information-processing perspective on the dynamics of self-control. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 586599.
Mullen E., & Monin B. (2016). Consistency versus licensing effects of past moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 363385.
Nolan J.M. & Schulz P.W. (2015). Prosocial behavior and environmental action. In Schroeder D.A. & Graziano W.G., The Oxford Handbook of Prosocial Behavior (pp. 626652). New York: Oxford University Press.
Seyranian V., Sinatra G.M., & Polikoff M.S. (2015). Comparing communication strategies for reducing residential water consumption. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 41, 8190.
Shah J.Y., & Kruglanski A.W. (2003). When opportunity knocks: Bottom-up priming of goals by means and its effects on self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 11091122.
Shah J.Y., Kruglanski A.W., & Friedman R. (2003). Goal systems theory: Integrating the cognitive and motivational aspects of self-regulation.
Shen L. J. (2008). Character and Relationship Research on Undergraduates' Environmental Values. Attitudes and Behaviors [D]. Taiyuan: Shangxi University, 2008.
Steg L., & Vlek C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 309317.
Stern P.C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407424.
Susewind M., & Hoelzl E. (2014). A matter of perspective: Why past moral behavior can sometimes encourage and other times discourage future moral striving. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44, 201209.
Tanner C., & Kast S.W. (2003). Promoting sustainable consumption: Determinants of green purchases by Swiss consumers. Psychology & Marketing, 20, 883902.
Thøgersen J. (1999). Spillover processes in the development of a sustainable consumption pattern. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 585, 313.
Tiefenbeck V., Staake T., Roth K., & Sachs O. (2013). For better or for worse? Empirical evidence of moral licensing in a behavioural energy conservation campaign. Energy Policy, 57, 160171.
Truelove H.B., Carrico A.R., Weber E.U., Raimi K.T., & Vandenbergh M.P. (2014). Positive and negative spillover of pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and theoretical framework. Global Environmental Change, 29, 127138.
Van der Werff E.V.D., Steg L., & Keizer K. (2014). Follow the signal: When past pro-environmental actions signal who you are. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 273282.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 1834-4909
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-pacific-rim-psychology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Geng supplementary material
Appendix

 Word (142 KB)
142 KB

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 38
Total number of PDF views: 223 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 286 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 5th December 2016 - 18th January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.