Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Investigating the Relationship Between Perceived Community Safety and the Public's Attitudes Towards the Treatment of Youth Offenders in New Zealand

  • Sean McArdle (a1), Ian Lambie (a1) and Sarah Miers (a1)
Abstract

While opinions on what should be done with youth offenders vary from person to person, perceived levels of safety and fear of crime have been linked to more punitive attitudes towards crime and punishment. Qualitative methods were employed to explore the attitudes and opinions of members of the New Zealand public with varying levels of community safety in respect to the treatment of youth offenders. Results indicate those who identified as lowest in levels of safety were more punitive in their opinions, though they also expressed a firm desire for progressive treatment options such as rehabilitation and taking preventative action. Those who felt the safest in their community were less likely to be punitive in their opinions towards youth offenders.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Investigating the Relationship Between Perceived Community Safety and the Public's Attitudes Towards the Treatment of Youth Offenders in New Zealand
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Investigating the Relationship Between Perceived Community Safety and the Public's Attitudes Towards the Treatment of Youth Offenders in New Zealand
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Investigating the Relationship Between Perceived Community Safety and the Public's Attitudes Towards the Treatment of Youth Offenders in New Zealand
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Associate Professor Ian Lambie, School of Psychology, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand. Email: i.lambie@auckland.ac.nz
References
Hide All
Alexander, J., & Parsons, B.V. (1982). Functional Family Therapy. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.
Allen, R. (2002). ‘There must be some way of dealing with kids’: Young offenders, public attitudes and policy change. Youth Justice, 2, 313.
Aos, S., Phipps, P., Barnoski, R., & Lieb, R. (2001). The comparative costs and benefits of programs to reduce crime. Version 4.0. (Report No. 01-05-1201). Washington, DC: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
Applegate, B.K., Cullen, F.T., & Fisher, B.S. (2002). Public views toward crime and correctional policies: Is there a gender gap? Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 89100.
Baron, S., & Hartnagel, T. (1996). ‘Lock'em up’: Attitudes toward punishing juvenile offenders. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 38, 191212.
Bartlett, T. (2009). Public influences on penal and sentencing policy from 1999 to 2008 (Unpublished master's dissertation). Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington.
Benda, B. (2013). Rehabilitation issues, problems, and prospects in boot camp. New York, NY: Routledge.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77101.
Brookman, R.P., & Wiener, K.K. (2017). Predicting punitive attitudes to sentencing: Does the public's perceptions of crime and Indigenous Australians matter? Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 50, 5677.
Caldwell, M.F., & Van Rybroek, G. (2013). Effective treatment programs for violent adolescents: Programmatic challenges and promising features. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18, 571578.
Costelloe, M.T., Chiricos, T., Buriánek, J., Gertz, M., & Maier-Katkin, D. (2002). The social correlates of punitiveness toward criminals: A comparison of the Czech Republic and Florida. Justice System Journal, 23, 191220.
Department of Corrections. (2012). Department of Corrections 2012/2013 Annual Report. Wellington, NZ: Author.
Gandy, J. (1978). Attitudes toward the use of restitution. In Galaway, B. & Hudson, J. (Eds.), Offender restitution in theory and action (pp. 119129). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Hough, M., Lewis, H., & Walker, N. (1988). Factors associated with punitiveness in England and Wales. In Walker, N. & Hough, M. (Eds.), Public attitudes to sentencing: Surveys from five countries (pp. 203217). Aldershot, England: Brookfield.
Hough, M., & Moxon, D. (1985). Dealing with offenders: Popular opinion and the views of victims. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 24, 160175.
Huey, S.J. Jr., Henggeler, S.W., Brondino, M.J., & Pickrel, S.G. (2000). Mechanisms of change in multisystemic therapy: Reducing delinquent behavior through therapist adherence and improved family and peer functioning. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 451467.
Lambie, I., Ioane, J., & Best, C. (2014). 17 year olds and youth justice. New Zealand Law Journal, 8, 316320.
Langworthy, R.H., & Whitehead, J.T. (1986). Liberalism and fear as explanations of punitiveness. Criminology, 24, 575591.
Lee, A. (1996). Public attitudes towards restorative justice. In Galaway, B. & Hudson, J. (Eds.), Restorative justice: International perspectives (pp. 337347). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
Lipsey, M.W. (2009). The primary factors that characterize effective interventions with juvenile offenders: A meta-analytic overview. Victims & Offenders, 4, 124147.
Lipsey, M.W., & Cullen, F.T. (2007). The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: A review of systematic reviews. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3, 297320.
Loeber, R., & Farrington, D.P. (1998). Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions. London: Sage Publications.
Maruna, S., & King, A. (2009). Once a criminal, always a criminal?: ‘Redeemability’ and the psychology of punitive public attitudes. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 15, 724.
Ministry of Justice. (2014). Reoffending analysis for restorative justice cases 2008–2011. Wellington, NZ: Author. Retrieved from https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Publications/rj-Reoffending-Analysis-for-Restorative-Justice-Cases-2008–2013-Summary-Results.pdf.
Ouimet, M., & Coyle, E.J. (1991). Fear of crime and sentencing punitiveness: Comparing the general public and court practitioners. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 33, 149172.
Piquero, A.R., Cullen, F.T., Unnever, J.D., Piquero, N.L., & Gordon, J.A. (2010). Never too late: Public optimism about juvenile rehabilitation. Punishment & Society, 12, 187207.
Piquero, A.R., & Steinberg, L. (2009). Public preferences for rehabilitation versus incarceration of juvenile offenders. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 16.
Pratt, J. (2007). Penal populism. London and New York: Routledge.
Pratt, J., & Clark, M. (2005). Penal populism in New Zealand. Punishment & Society, 7, 303322.
Roberts, J.V. (2004). Public opinion and youth justice. Crime and Justice, 31, 495542.
Roper, T., & Thompson, A. (2006). Estimating the costs of crime in New Zealand in 2003/04. (Report No. 06/04). Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Treasury. Retrieved from https://treasury.govt.nz/sites/default/files/2007-09/twp06-04.pdf
Rowe, M. (2013). Perceptions of fear of crime and punitivity in New Zealand. In Kury, Helmut & Winterdyk, J. (Eds.), Fear of crime and punitiveness: Results from international student surveys (vol. 9, p. 81). Brockmeyer Verlag.
Rübsamen, N., Akmatov, M.K., Castell, S., Karch, A., & Mikolajczyk, R.T. (2017). Comparison of response patterns in different survey designs: A longitudinal panel with mixed-mode and online-only design. Emerging Themes in Epidemiology, 14, 4.
Schwartz, I.M., Guo, S., & Kerbs, J.J. (1992). Public attitudes toward juvenile crime and juvenile justice: Implications for public policy. Hamline Journal of Public Law & Policy, 13, 241262.
Scott, E.S., Reppucci, N.D., Antonishak, J., & DeGennaro, J.T. (2006). Public attitudes about the culpability and punishment of young offenders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 24, 815832.
Scott, S. (2008). An update on interventions for conduct disorder. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 14, 6170.
Sexton, T.L., & Alexander, J.F. (2002). Family-based empirically supported interventions. The Counseling Psychologist, 30, 238261.
Spiranovic, C.A., Roberts, L.D., & Indermaur, D. (2012). What predicts punitiveness? An examination of predictors of punitive attitudes towards offenders in Australia. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 19, 249261.
Thakker, J. (2012). Public attitudes to sex offenders in New Zealand. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 18, 149163.
Thomas, D.R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 237246.
Wood, J., & Viki, G.T. (2004). Public perceptions of crime and punishment. In Adler, J.R. (Ed.), Forensic psychology: Concepts, debates and practice (pp. 1636). Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.
Yoshikawa, H. (1994). Prevention as cumulative protection: Effects of early family support and education on chronic delinquency and its risks. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 2854.
Zarafonitou, C. (2011). Punitiveness, fear of crime and social views. In Kury, H. & Shea, E. (Eds.), Punitivity international developments (vol. 2, pp. 269294). Bochum, Germany: Brockmeyer Verlag University Press.
Zehr, H. (2005). Changing lenses: A new focus for crime and justice. Scottsdale, PA: Herald Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 1834-4909
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-pacific-rim-psychology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed