Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Taking Advice for Vocational Decisions: Regulatory Fit Effects

  • Kang Tinghu (a1), Wang Li (a1), Xi Peiling (a1) and Pang Qian (a1)
Abstract

This study examined whether taking advice is influenced by regulatory fit and whether this effect is reduced or disappears within certain attribution conditions during vocational decision making. Experiment 1 created a vocational decision setting to compare differences in decision makers’ weight of advice (WOA) between ‘eager strategy’ and ‘vigilant strategy’ advice conditions. Results showed no significant main effect of regulatory orientation or advice strategy, but there was a significant interaction. The WOA value, with fit between regulatory focus and advice strategy, was higher than with a fit violation. Experiment 2 examined whether the regulatory fit effect is reduced or disappears within attribution conditions during vocational decision making. Results showed job seekers more easily take others’ advice under the fit condition, and a significant interaction existed between regulatory fit and attribution. Thus, attribution could reduce the influence of the regulatory fit effect. Implications for vocational consultants, job seekers, and advisors are also discussed.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Taking Advice for Vocational Decisions: Regulatory Fit Effects
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Taking Advice for Vocational Decisions: Regulatory Fit Effects
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Taking Advice for Vocational Decisions: Regulatory Fit Effects
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Kang Tinghu, School of Psychology, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou, 730070, China. Email: kangyan313@126.com
References
Hide All
Aaker, J.L., & Lee, A.Y. (2006). Understanding regulatory fit. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 1519. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.43.1.15
Blau, P.M., Gustad, J.S., Jesser, R., Parnes, H.S., & Wilcock, R.C. (1956). Occupational choice: A conceptual framework. Industrial Labor Relations Review, 9, 531543. doi:10.2307/2519672
Bonaccio, S., & Dalal, R.S. (2006). Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2, 127151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.07.001
Brayfield, A.H. (1963). Counseling psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 14, 319350.
Brockner, J., Higgins, E.T., & Low, M.B. (2004). Regulatory focus theory and the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 2, 203220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00007-7
Camacho, C.J., Higgins, E.T., & Luger, L. (2003). Moral value transfer from regulatory fit: ‘What feels right is right’ and ‘What feels wrong is wrong’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 498510. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.498
Cesario, J., Grant, H., & Higgins, E.T. (2004). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from ‘Feeling right’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 388404. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.3.388
Cesario, J., Higgins, E.T., & Scholer, A.A. (2008). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Basic principles and remaining questions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2/1, 444463. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00055.x
Clore, G.L. (1992). Cognitive phenomenology: Feelings and the construction of judgment. In Martin, L.L. & Tesser, A. (Eds.), The construction of social judgments (pp. 133163). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Clore, G.L., Wyer, R.S., Dienes, B., Gasper, K., Gohm, C., & Isbell, L. (2001). Affective feelings as feedback: Some cognitive consequences. In Martin, L.L. & Clore, G.L. (Eds.), Theories of mood and cognition: A user's handbook (pp. 2762). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Crowe, E., & Higgins, E.T. (1997). Regulatory fit and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 117132. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.2675
Feng, B., & Feng, H. (2013). Examining cultural similarities and differences in responses to advice: A comparison of American and Chinese college students. Communication Research, 5, 623644. doi:10.1177/0093650211433826
Friedman, R.S., & Förster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 10011013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1001.
Gino, F. (2008). Do we listen to advice just because we paid for it? The impact of advice cost on its use. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2, 234245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.03.001
Gino, F., & Moore, D.A. (2007). Effects of task difficulty on use of advice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 20, 2135. doi:10.1002/bdm.539
Gino, F., & Schweitzer, M.E. (2008). Blinded by anger or feeling the love: How emotions influence advice taking. Journal of Applied Psychology, 5, 11651173. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1165
Harries, C., Yaniv, I., & Harvey, N. (2004). Combining advice: The weight of a dissenting opinion in the consensus. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 17, 333348. doi:10.1002/bdm.474
Higgins, E.T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 12801300. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.52.12.1280
Higgins, E.T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55, 12171230. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.55.11.1217
Higgins, E.T., Idson, L.C., Freitas, A.L., Spiegel, S., & Molden, D.C. (2003). Transfer of value from fit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 11401153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1140
Higgins, E.T. (2005). Value from regulatory fit. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 209213. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005. 00366.x
Jepsen, D.A., & Dilley, J.S. (1974). Vocational decision-making models: A review and comparative analysis. Review of Educational Research, 44, 331349. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543044003331
Kang, T.H., Pang, Q., & Zhang, F. (2014). The effect of trust on advice taking in career decision-making process. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 3, 371376
Krueger, J.I. (2003). Return of the ego-self referent information as a filter for social prediction: Comment on Karniol (2003). Psychological Review, 110, 585590. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.585
Kung, F.Y.H., Kim, Y.H., Yang, D.Y.J., & Cheng, S.Y.Y. (2016). The role of regulatory fit in framing effective negative feedback across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 5, 696712. doi:10.1177/0022022116638172
Lee, A.Y., & Aaker, J.L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 205218. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86. 2.205
Lee, A.Y., Keller, P.A., & Sternthal, B. (2010). Value from regulatory construal fit: The persuasive impact of fit between consumer goals and message concreteness. Journal of Consumer Research, 5, 735747. doi:10.1086/605591
Pham, M., T., & Avnet, T. (2004). Ideals and oughts and the reliance on affect versus substance in persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 503518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/380285
Polman, E. (2012). Effects of self–other decision making on regulatory focus and choice overload. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 980993. doi:10.1037/a0026966
Price, P.C., & Stone, E.R. (2004). Intuitive evaluation of likelihood judgment producers: Evidence for a confidence heuristic. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 17, 3957. doi:10.1002/bdm.460
Righetti, F., Finkenauer, C., & Rusbult, C. (2011). The benefits of interpersonal regulatory fit for individual goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 720736. doi:10.1037/a0023592
Savadori, L., Van Swol, L.M., & Sniezek, J.A. (2001). Information sampling and confidence within groups and judge advisor systems. Communication Research, 28, 737771. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/009365001028006002
Schwarz, N. (2012). Feelings-as-information theory. In Van Lange, P., Kruglanski, A., & Higgins, E.T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 289308). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n15
Shen, H., Wan, F., & Wyer, R.S. (2009). Cross-cultural differences in the refusal to accept a small gift: The differential influence of reciprocity norms on Asians and North Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 271281. doi:10.1037/a0021201
Sniezek, J.A., & Buckley, T. (1995). Cueing and cognitive conflict in judge-advisor decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2, 159174. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1040
Sniezek, J.A., & Van Swol, L.M. (2001). Trust, confidence, and expertise in a judge-advisor system. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2, 288307. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2926
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2000). Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures. London, UK: Continuum.
Triandis, H.C., & Suh, E.M. (2002). Cultural influences on personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 53,133160. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135200
Wu, S.Y., & Rubin, D.L. (2000). Evaluating the impact of collectivism and individualism on argumentative writing by Chinese and North American college students. Research in the Teaching of English, 35, 148178. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40171513
Yaniv, I. (2004a). The benefit of additional opinions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 7578. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00278.x
Yaniv, I. (2004b). Receiving other people's advice: Influence and benefit. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1, 113. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2003.08.002
Yaniv, I. (1997). Weighting and trimming: Heuristics for aggregation of judgments under uncertainty. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 237249. doi:10.1006/obhd.1997.2685
Yaniv, I., & Kleinberger, E. (2000). Advice taking in decision making: Egocentric discounting and reputation formation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83, 260281. doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2909
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 1834-4909
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-pacific-rim-psychology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 10
Total number of PDF views: 81 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 105 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 14th February 2018 - 20th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.