Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T08:01:43.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coping with demographic change: macroeconomic performance and welfare inequality effects of public pension reform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2022

Willem Devriendt ,
Freddy Heylen  and
Arthur Jacobs
Willem Devriendt
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Ghent University, Sint-Pietersplein 6, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
Freddy Heylen*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Ghent University, Sint-Pietersplein 6, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
Arthur Jacobs
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Ghent University, Tweekerkenstraat 2, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
*
*Corresponding author. Email: Freddy.Heylen@UGent.be
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper evaluates alternative reforms of the public pension system in an overlapping generations model for an open economy facing demographic change. We make progress compared to existing literature on pension reform by modelling individuals with heterogeneous innate ability and endogenous human capital, and by putting (the reduction of) welfare inequality effects of reform at the centre. Frequently adopted reforms such as an increase of the normal retirement age or a decrease of the pension benefit can guarantee financial sustainability, but they fail when the objective is also to avoid intergenerational or intragenerational welfare inequality. Our results prefer a reform which combines an increase of the retirement age with an intelligent linkage between the pension benefit and earlier labour earnings. First, this design conditions pension benefits on past individual labour income, with a high weight on labour income earned when older and a low weight on labour income earned when young. Second, this linkage is complemented by a strong rise in the benefit replacement rate for low ability individuals (and a reduction for high ability individuals).

Keywords

Demographic changeheterogeneous abilitiesinequalityoverlapping generationspension reformC68E24J11J26H55
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Pension Economics & Finance , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , July 2023 , pp. 425 - 449
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beetsma, R, Klaassen, F, Romp, W and van Maurik, R (2020) What drives pension reforms in the OECD? Economic Policy 35(102), 357–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boucekkine, R (1995) An alternative methodology for solving nonlinear forward-looking models. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 19, 711–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouzahzah, M, de la Croix, D and Docquier, F (2002) Policy reforms and growth in computational OLG economies. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 19, 2093–2113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buyse, T, Heylen, F and Van de Kerckhove, R (2013) Pension reform, employment by age, and long-run growth. Journal of Population Economics 26, 769–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buyse, T, Heylen, F and Van de Kerckhove, R (2017) Pension reform in an OLG model with heterogeneous abilities. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance 16, 144–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caselli, F and Coleman, W (2006) The world technology frontier. American Economic Review 96, 499–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cervellati, M and Sunde, U (2013) Life expectancy, schooling, and lifetime labor supply: theory and evidence revisited. Econometrica 81, 2055–2086.Google Scholar
Cigno, A (2008) Is there a social security tax wedge? Labour Economics 15, 68–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de la Croix, D, Pierrard, O and Sneessens, H (2013) Aging and pensions in general equilibrium: labor market imperfections matter. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 37, 104–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devriendt, W and Heylen, F (2020) Macroeconomic and distributional effects of demographic change in an open economy – the case of Belgium. Journal of Demographic Economics 86, 87–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Docquier, F and Paddison, O (2003) Social security benefit rules, growth, and inequality. Journal of Macroeconomics 25, 47–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etgeton, S (2018) The effect of pension reforms on old-age income inequality. Labour Economics 53, 146–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feenstra, RC, Inklaar, R and Timmer, MP (2015) The next generation of the Penn world table. American Economic Review 105, 3150–3182, Available at http://www.ggdc.net/pwt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, H (2000) Pension reform during the demographic transition. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 102, 419–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, H, Kallweit, M and Kindermann, F (2012) Pension reform with variable retirement age: a simulation analysis for Germany. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance 11, 389–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, H, Kallweit, M and Kindermann, F (2013) Should pensions be progressive? European Economic Review 63, 94–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, W and Keuschnigg, C (2010) Pension reform and labor market incentives. Journal of Population Economics 23, 769–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frassi, B, Gnecco, G, Pammolli, F and Wen, X (2019) Intragenerational redistribution in a funded pension system. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance 18, 271–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fried, S, Novan, K and Peterman, WB (2018) The distributional effects of a carbon tax on current and future generations. Review of Economic Dynamics 30, 30–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huggett, M, Ventura, G and Yaron, A (2011) Sources of lifetime inequality. American Economic Review 101, 2923–2954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imrohoroglu, S and Kitao, S (2012) Social security reforms: benefit claiming, labor force participation, and long-run sustainability. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 4, 96–127.Google Scholar
Jaag, C, Keuschnigg, C and Keuschnigg, M (2010) Pension reform, retirement, and life-cycle unemployment. International Tax and Public Finance 17, 556–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juillard, M (1996) Dynare : a program for the resolution and simulation of dynamic models with forward variables through the use of a relaxation algorithm. Cepremap working papers (couverture orange), CEPREMAP, Available at https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpm/cepmap/9602.htmlGoogle Scholar
Kanbur, R and Stiglitz, JE (2015) Wealth and income distribution: new theories needed for a new era. VoxEUorg 18 August.Google Scholar
Keane, M and Wolpin, K (1997) The career decisions of young men. Journal of Political Economy 105, 473–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemnitz, A and Wigger, B (2000) Growth and social security: the role of human capital. European Journal of Political Economy 16, 673–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kindermann, F (2015) Earnings related pension schemes and human capital formation. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance 14, 19–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitao, S (2014) Sustainable social security: four options. Review of Economic Dynamics 17, 756–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotlikoff, LJ, Smetters, K and Walliser, J (2007) Mitigating America's demographic dilemma by pre-funding social security. Journal of Monetary Economics 54, 247–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laun, T, Markussen, S, Vigtel, TC and Wallenius, J (2019) Health, longevity and retirement reform. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 103, 123–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Garrec, G (2015) Increased longevity and social security reform: questioning the optimality of individual accounts when education matters. Journal of Population Economics 28(2), 329–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y (2018) Paradoxical effects of increasing the normal retirement age: a prospective evaluation. European Economic Review 101, 512–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, R (1990) Supply-side economics: an analytical review. Oxford Economic Papers 42, 292–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, A, Schelkle, T and Vogel, E (2011) Online appendix to ‘Demographic change, human capital and welfare’. Online Appendices 08-168. Review of Economic Dynamics. https://ideas.repec.org/p/red/append/08-168.htmlGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, A, Schelkle, T and Vogel, E (2012) Demographic change, human capital and welfare. Review of Economic Dynamics 15, 94–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, D (1999) Modelling the impact of demographic change upon the economy. The Economic Journal 109, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (2019) Pensions at a glance 2019.Google Scholar
Rogerson, R (2007) Taxation and market work: is Scandinavia an outlier? Economic Theory 32, 59–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogerson, R and Wallenius, J (2009) Micro and macro elasticities in a life cycle model with taxes. Journal of Economic Theory 144, 2277–2292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez-Romero, M and Prskawetz, A (2017) Redistributive effects of the US pension system among individuals with different life expectancy. The Journal of the Economics of Ageing 10, 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schokkaert, E, Devolder, P, Hindriks, J and Vandenbroucke, F (2020) Towards an equitable and sustainable points system. a proposal for pension reform in Belgium. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance 19, 49–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheshinski, E (1978) A model of social security and retirement decisions. Journal of Public Economics 10, 337–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommacal, A (2006) Pension systems and intragenerational redistribution when labor supply is endogenous. Oxford Economic Papers 58, 379–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyrowicz, J, Makarski, K and Bielecki, M (2018) Inequality in an OLG economy with heterogeneous cohorts and pension systems. The Journal of Economic Inequality 16, 583–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Weizsacker, RK (1996) Distributive implications of an aging society. European Economic Review 40, 729–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J (1995) Social security and endogenous growth. Journal of Public Economics 58, 185–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Devriendt et al. supplementary material

Appendix

Download Devriendt et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 249 KB