Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Evidence on individual preferences for longevity risk*

  • G. DELPRAT (a1), M.-L. LEROUX (a2) and P.-C. MICHAUD (a3)

The standard model of intertemporal choice assumes risk neutrality towards the length of life: under additivity of lifetime utility and expected utility assumptions, agents are not sensitive to a mean preserving spread in the length of life. Using a survey fielded in the RAND American Life Panel, this paper provides empirical evidence on possible deviation from risk neutrality with respect to longevity in the US population. The questions we ask allow to find the distribution as well as to quantify the degree of risk aversion with respect to the length of life in the population. We find evidence that roughly 75% of respondents were not neutral with respect to longevity risk. Hence, there is a little empirical support for the joint use of the expected utility and additive lifetime utility assumptions in life-cycle models. Higher income households are more likely to be risk averse towards the length of life. We do not find evidence that the degree of risk aversion varies with age or education.

Hide All

We acknowledge financial support from the RAND Roybal Center for Financial Decision Making, the Industrielle Alliance Research Chair on the Economics of Demographic Change and thank the RAND ALP survey team for fielding our questions. We also thank A. Bommier, A. Kapteyn, A. Hung, A. van Soest, P. Pestieau, G. Ponthiere as well as two anonymous referees for their comments and suggestions.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

R. Barsky , T. Juster , K. Miles and M. Shapiro (1997) Preference parameters and behavioral heterogeneity: an experimental approach in the Health and Retirement Study. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2): 537579, In Memory of Amos Tversky (1937–1996).

H. Bleichrodt and J. Quiggin (1999) Life-cycle preferences over consumption and health: when is cost-effectiveness analysis equivalent to cost-benefit analysis? Journal of Health Economics 18: 681708.

A. Bommier (2006) Uncertain lifetime and intertemporal choice: risk aversion as a rationale for time discounting. International Economic Review, 47(4): 12231246.

A. Bommier and B. Villeneuve (2012) Risk aversion and the value of risk to life. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 79(1): 77103.

A. Bommier , M.-L. Leroux and J.-M. Lozachmeur (2011 a) On the public economics of annuities with differential mortality. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8): 612623.

A. Bommier , M.-L. Leroux and J.-M. Lozachmeur (2011 b) Differential mortality and social security. Canadian Journal of Economics, 44(1): 273289.

M. Cagetti (2003) Wealth accumulation over the life cycle and precautionary savings. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 21(3): 339353.

G. A. Calvo and M. Obstfeld (1988) Optimal time-consistent fiscal policy with finite lifetimes. Econometrica, 56: 411432.

M. Cohen , J. Y. Jaffray and T. Said (1985) Individual behaviour under risk and under uncertainty: an experimental study. Theory and Decision, 18: 203228.

T. Davidoff , J. R. Brown and P. A. Diamond (2005) Annuities and individual welfare. American Economic Review, 95(5): 15731590.

M. Fleurbaey , M.-L. Leroux and G. Ponthiere (2014) Compensating the dead? Journal of Mathematical Economics, 51: 2841.

C. Holt and S. Laury (2002) Risk aversion and incentive effects. The American Economic Review, 92(5): 16441655.

A. Kapteyn and F. Teppa (2011) Subjective measures of risk aversion, fixed costs, and portfolio choice. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32: 564580.

R. E. Kihlstrom and L. J. Mirman (1974) Risk aversion with many commodities. Journal of Economic Theory, 8: 361388.

E. C. Lawrance (1991) Poverty and the rate of time preference: evidence from panel data. Journal of Political Economy, 99(1): 5477.

M.-L. Leroux , P. Pestieau and G. Ponthire (2011) Longevity, genes and efforts: an optimal taxation approach to prevention. Journal of Health Economics, 30(1): 6276.

J. J. Louviere , D. A. Hensher and J. D. Swait (2000) Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

A. Maas and P. Wakker (1994) Additive conjoint measurement for multi attribute utility. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 38: 86101.

J. Pratt (1964) Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica, 32(1/2): 122136.

W. Ried (1998) QALYs versus HYEswhats right and whats wrong. A review of the controversy. Journal of Health Economics, 17: 607625.

A. M. Stiggelbout , G. M. Kiebert , J. Kievit , J. W. H. Leer , G. Stoter and J. C. J. M. De Haes (1994) Utility assessment in cancer patients: adjustment of time tradeoff scores for the utility of life years and comparison with standard gamble scores. Medical Decision Making, 14: 8289.

L. Verhoef , A. De Haan and W. Van Daal (1994) Risk attitude in gambles with years of life: empirical support for prospect theory. Medical Decision Making, 14: 194200.

M. Yaari (1965) Uncertain lifetime, life insurance and the theory of the consumer. The Review of Economic Studies, 32(2): 137150.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Pension Economics & Finance
  • ISSN: 1474-7472
  • EISSN: 1475-3022
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-pension-economics-and-finance
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 6
Total number of PDF views: 34 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 205 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.