Skip to main content
×
×
Home

How much do means-tested benefits reduce the demand for annuities?*

  • MONIKA BÜTLER (a1), KIM PEIJNENBURG (a2) and STEFAN STAUBLI (a3)
Abstract

Means-tested retirement benefits create incentives to cash out pension wealth. Individuals trade off the advantages from annuitization, receiving longevity risk insurance, to the disadvantages, giving up ‘free’ wealth in the form of means-tested supplemental income. We quantify the impact of means-tested benefits with a calibrated life-cycle model, demonstrating that they substantially reduce the desire to annuitize especially for low and intermediate levels of pension wealth. Using an administrative dataset on pension choices, we show that the model's predicted fraction of retirees choosing the annuity is able to match the annuitization pattern of occupational pension wealth observed in Switzerland. On the base of our model, we also assess alternative policies such as mandatory annutization and tougher asset tests.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      How much do means-tested benefits reduce the demand for annuities?*
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      How much do means-tested benefits reduce the demand for annuities?*
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      How much do means-tested benefits reduce the demand for annuities?*
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

We thank seminar participants at the University of St. Gallen, the University of Zurich, the Netspar Pension Workshop, and various conferences for helpful comments and suggestions. Part of this research was conducted while Kim Peijnenburg was visiting the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, and she is grateful for their hospitality. We kindly acknowledge a research paper grant from the Centre for Pensions and Superannuationand Kim Peijnenburg acknowledges financial support from All Pensions Group.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Ameriks, J., Caplin, A., Laufer, S. and Van Nieuwerburgh, S. (2011) The joy of giving or assisted living? Using strategic surveys to separate public care aversion from bequest motives. Journal of Finance, 66(2): 519561.
Benartzi, S., Previtero, A. and Thaler, R. H. (2011) Annuitization puzzles. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(4): 143164.
Bernheim, D. (1991) How strong are bequest motives? Evidence based on estimates of the demand for life insurance and annuities. Journal of Political Economy, 99: 899927.
Brown, J. and Finkelstein, A. (2008) The interaction of public and private insurance: Medicaid and the long-term care insurance market. American Economic Review, 98(3): 10831102.
Brown, J., Mitchell, O. S., Poterba, J. and Warshawsky, M. (2001) The Role of Annuity Markets in Financing Retirement. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Brown, J. R. (2001) Private pensions, mortality risk, and the decision to annuitize. Journal of Public Economics, 82(1): 2962.
Brown, J. R. and Poterba, J. M. (2000) Joint life annuities and the demand for annuities by married couples. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 67(4): 527553.
Brown, J. R., Kling, J. R., Mullainathan, S. and Wrobel, M. V. (2008) Why don't people insure late life consumption? A framing explanation of the under-annuitization puzzle. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 98(2): 304309.
Brown, J. R., Kapteyn, A., Luttmer, E. F. and Mitchell, O. S. (2013) Decision complexity as a barrier to annuitization. NBER Working Paper Series No. 19168.
Bütler, M. and Teppa, F. (2007) The choice between an annuity and a lump-sum: results from Swiss pension funds. Journal of Public Economics, 91: 19441966.
Bütler, M., Staubli, S. and Zito, M. G. (2013) How much does annuity demand react to a large price change? The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 115(3): 808824.
Caliendo, F., Guo, N. and Hosseini, R. (2014) Social security is not a substitute for annuity markets. forthcoming Review of Economic Dynamics, 17: 739755.
Davidoff, T. (2009) Housing, health, and annuities. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 76(1): 3152.
Davidoff, T., Brown, J. and Diamond, P. (2005) Annuities and individual welfare. The American Economic Review, 95(5): 15731590.
De Nardi, M., French, E. and Jones, J. (2010) Why do the elderly save? The role of medical expenses. Journal of Political Economy, 118(1): 3975.
Direr, A. (2010) The taxation of life annuities under adverse selection. Journal of Public Economics, 94(1–2): 5058.
Dushi, I. and Webb, A. (2004) Household annuitization decisions: simulations and empirical analyses. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 3(2): 109143.
Finkelstein, A. and Poterba, J. (2002) Selection effects in the United Kingdom individual annuities market. The Economic Journal, 112: 2842.
Finkelstein, A. and Poterba, J. (2004) Adverse selection in insurance markets: policyholder evidence from the U.K. annuity market. Journal of Political Economy, 112(1): 183208.
Franklin, B. (2014) Freedom and choice in pensions: risks and opportunities. ILC-UK Working Paper.
Friedman, B. and Warshawsky, M. (1990) The cost of annuities: implications for saving behavior and bequests. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105: 135154.
Hu, W. and Scott, J. (2007) Behavioral obstacles in the annuity market. Financial Analysts Journal, 63(6): 7182.
Hubbard, R., Skinner, J. and Zeldes, S. (1995) Precautionary saving and social insurance. The Journal of Political Economy, 103(2): 360399.
Inkmann, J., Lopes, P. and Michaelides, A. (2011) How deep is the annuity market participation puzzle? Review of Financial Studies, 24(1): 279319.
Kalwij, A., Alessie, R. and Knoef, M. (2013) The association between individual income and remaining life expectancy at the age of 65 in the Netherlands. Demography, 50(1): 181206.
Kotlikoff, L. J. and Spivak, A. (1981) The family as an incomplete annuities market. Journal of Political Economy, 89(2): 372391.
Lockwood, L. (2012) Bequest motives and the annuity puzzle. Review of Economic Dynamics, 15(2): 226243.
Mitchell, O., Poterba, J., Warshawsky, M. and Brown, J. R. (1999) New evidence on the money's worth of individual annuities. American Economic Review, 89(5): 12991318.
Neumark, D. and Powers, E. (1998) The effect of means-tested income support for the elderly on pre-retirement savings: evidence form the SSI program in the U.S. Journal of Public Economics, 68(2): 181206.
Neumark, D. and Powers, E. (2000) Welfare for the elderly: the effects of SSI on pre-retirement labor supply. Journal of Public Economics, 78(1–2): 5180.
OECD (2011) Pensions at a glance 2011: retirement-income systems in OECD and G20 countries. http://www.oecd.org/els/social/pensions/PAG
Pang, G. and Warshawsky, M. (2010) Optimizing the equity-bond-annuity portfolio in retirement: the impact of uncertain health expenses. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 46(1): 198209.
Pashchenko, S. (2013) Accounting for non-annuitization. Journal of Public Economics, 98: 5367.
Peijnenburg, K., Nijman, T. and Werker, B. (2013) The annuity puzzle remains a puzzle. Working paper.
Peijnenburg, K., Nijman, T. and Werker, B. (2014) Health cost risk: a potential solution to the annuity puzzle. Working paper, Tilburg University.
Powers, E. (1998) Does means-testing welfare discourage saving? Evidence from a change in AFDC policy in the United States. Journal of Public Economics, 68(1): 3353.
Rothschild, C. (2009) Adverse selection in annuity markets: evidence from the British life annuity act of 1808. Journal of Public Economics, 93(5–6): 776784.
Sefton, J., Van De Ven, J. and Weale, M. (2008) Means testing retirement benefits: fostering equity or discouraging savings? Economic Journal, 118(528): 556590.
Yaari, M. (1965) Uncertain lifetime, life insurance and the theory of the consumer. Review of Economic Studies, 32(2): 137150.
Yogo, M. (2009) Portfolio choice in retirement: Health risk and the demand for annuities, housing and risky assets. NBER Working Paper No. 15307.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Pension Economics & Finance
  • ISSN: 1474-7472
  • EISSN: 1475-3022
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-pension-economics-and-finance
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Butler supplementary material
Appendix

 PDF (132 KB)
132 KB

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed