Skip to main content

Preferences for redistribution and pensions. What can we learn from experiments?


Redistribution is an inevitable feature of collective pension schemes and economic experiments have revealed that most people have a preference for redistribution that is not merely inspired by self-interest. However, little is known on how these preferences interact with preferences for different pension schemes. In this paper, we review the experimental evidence on preferences for redistribution and suggest some links to redistribution through pensions. For that purpose we distinguish between three types of situations. The first deals with distributional preferences behind a veil of ignorance. In the second type of situation, individuals make choices in front of the veil of ignorance and know their position. Finally, we discuss situations in which income is determined by interdependent rather than individual choices. In the closing sections of the paper, we discuss whether and how these experimental results speak to the redistribution issues of pensions. For example, do they argue for or against mandatory participation? Should we have less redistribution and more actuarial fairness? How does this depend on the type of redistribution involved?

Hide All
Bardsley N. (2008) Dictator game giving: altruism or artifact? Experimental Economics, 11: 122133.
Barr A. and Genicot G. (2008) Risk sharing, commitment and information: an experimental analysis. Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(6): 11511185.
Bellemare C., Kröger S. and van Soest A. (2008) Measuring inequity aversion in a heterogeneous population using experimental decisions and subjective probabilities. Econometrica, 76(4): 815839.
Bolton G. E. and Katok E. (1995) An experimental test for gender differences in beneficent behavior. Economics Letters, 48: 287292.
Bolton G. E. and Ockenfels A. (2000) ERC: a theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. American Economic Review, 90: 166193.
Cabrales A., Nagel R. and Rodriguez Mora J. V. (2006) It is Hobbes, not Rousseau: an experiment on social insurance. UC3M Working Paper 07–08.
Camerer C. (2003) Behavioral Game Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cappelen A., Hole A. D., Sørensen E. Ø. and Tungodden B. (2007) The pluralism of fairness ideals: an experimental approach. American Economic Review, 97: 818827.
Cappelen A. W., Konow J., Sørensen E. Ø. and Tungodden B. (2012) Just luck: an experimental study of risk taking and fairness. Forthcoming in American Economic Review.
Carpenter J., Verhoogen E. and Burks S. (2005) The effect of stakes in distribution experiments. Economics Letters, 86: 393398.
Centraal Planbureau (2000) Solidariteit, keuzevrijheid, en transparantie. De toekomst van de Nederlandse markt voor oudedagsvoorzieningen (Solidarity, freedom of choice, and transparency. The future of the market for old-age security in the Netherlands), Den Haag, SDU Uitgevers.
Charness G. and Genicot G. (2009) Informal risk sharing in an infinite-horizon experiment. Economic Journal, 119: 796825.
Charness G. and Gneezy U. (2008) What's in a name? Anonymity and social distance in dictator and ultimatum games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 68(1): 2935.
Chaudhuri A., Gangadharan L. and Maitra P. (2010) An experimental analysis of group size, endowment uncertainty and risk sharing. Working Paper. Available online at∼maitra/Risksharing_march26_2010.pdf.
Chavanne D., McCabe K. and Pia Paganelli M. (2009) Redistributive Justice – Entitlements and Inequality in a Third-Party Dictator Game. George Mason University Working Paper.
Croson R. and Gneezy U. (2009) Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2): 448474.
Cox J. C. and Deck C. A. (2006) When are women more generous than men? Economic Inquiry, 44(4): 587598.
D'Excelle B. and Riedl A. (2010) Directed Generosity and Network Formation: Network Dimension Matters, IZA Discussion Paper No. 5356, December 2010.
Dickinson D. L. and Tiefenthaler J. (2002) What is fair? Experimental evidence. Southern Economic Journal, 69(2): 414428.
Durante R. and Putterman L. (2009) Preferences for Redistribution and Perception of Fairness: An Experimental Study. Mimeo. Brown University.
Eckel C. and Grossman P. (1998) Are women less selfish than men? Evidence from dictator experiments. Economics Journal, 108: 726735.
Esarey J., Salmon T. and Barrilleaux C. (2009) Social Insurance and Income Redistribution in a Laboratory Experiment. Available online at
Faravelli M. (2007) How context matters: a survey based experiment on distributive justice. Journal of Public Economics, 91(7–8): 13991422.
Fehr E. and Falk A. (1999) Wage rigidity in a competitive incomplete contract market. Journal of Political Economy, 107: 106134.
Fehr E. and Schmidt K. (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114: 817868.
Forsythe R., Horowitz J., Savin N. E. and Sefton M. (1994) Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games and Economic Behavior, 6(3): 347369.
Frechette G. (2011) Laboratory Experiments: Professionals versus Students. Available online at
Frohlich N. and Oppenheimer J. A. (1990) Choosing justice in experimental democracies with production. American Political Science Review, 84(2): 461477.
Frohlich N., Oppenheimer J. A. and Eavey C. L. (1987) Choices of principles of distributive justice in experimental groups. American Journal of Political Science, 31(3): 606637.
Gächter S. and Riedl A. (2005) Moral property rights in bargaining with infeasible claims. Management Science, 51(2): 249263.
Gächter S. and Riedl A. (2006) Dividing justly in bargaining problems. Social Choice and Welfare, 27: 571594.
Goeree J., McConnell M. A., Mitchell T., Tromp T. and Yarif L. (2010) The 1/d law of giving. American Economic Journal: Micro-Economics, 2(1): 183203.
Güth W., Offerman T., Potters J., Strobel M. and Verbon H. (2002) Are family transfers crowded out by public transfers? Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 104(4): 587604.
Hammond P. (1975) Charity: altruism or cooperative egoism. In Phelps E. (ed.), Altruism, Morality and Economic Theory. New York: Sage, pp. 115131.
Harsanyi J. (1955) Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparison of well-being. Journal of Political Economy, 63: 309321.
Herne K. and Suojanen M. (2004) The role of information in choices over income distributions. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 48(2): 173193.
Höchtl W., Sausgruber R. and Tyran J.-R. (2011) Inequality Aversion and Voting on Redistribution. Discussion Paper No. 11–18, Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen.
Hoffman E., McCabe K. A., Shachat K. and Vernon L. S. (1994) Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games. Games and Economic Behavior, 7(3): 346380.
Hoffman E., McCabe K. and Smith V. L. (1996) Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games. American Economic Review, 86(3): 653660.
Jakiela P. (2009) How fair shares compare: experimental evidence from two cultures. Working Paper.
Johannesson M. and Persson B. (2000) Non-reciprocal altruism in dictator games. Economics Letters, 69: 137142.
Klor E. and Shayo M. (2010) Social identity and preferences over redistribution. Journal of Public Economics, 94: 269278.
Konow J. (1996) A positive theory of economic fairness. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 31: 1335.
Konow J. (2000) Fair shares: accountability and cognitive dissonance in allocation decisions. American Economic Review, 90(4): 10721091.
Konow J., Saijo T. and Akai K. (2009) Morals and Mores: Experimental Evidence on Equity and Equality. Mimeo.
Kotlikoff L. J., Persson T. and Svensson L. E. (1988) Social contracts as assets: a possible solution to the time-inconsistency problem. American Economic Review, 78: 662677.
Krawczyk M. and Le Lec F. (2008) Social Decisions under Risk. Evidence from the Probabilistic Dictator Game. Mimeo.
Leider S., Mobius M., Rosenblat T. and Do Q.-A. (2009) Directed altruism and enforced reciprocity in social networks. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(4): 18151851.
List J. A. (2007) On the interpretation of giving in dictator games. Journal of Political Economy, 115(3): 482493.
List J. A. and Cherry T. L. (2008) Examining the role of fairness in high stakes allocation decisions. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 65(1): 18.
Loewenstein G. F., Thompson L. and Bazerman M. H. (1989) Social utility and decision making in interpersonal contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57: 426441.
Messer K. D., Poe G. L., Rondeau D., Schulze W. D. and Vossler C. A. (2010) Social preferences and voting: an exploration using a novel preference revealing mechanism. Journal of Public Economics, 94: 308317.
Normann H.-T. and Ricciuti R. (2009) Laboratory experiments for economic policy making. Journal of Economic Surveys, 23: 407463.
Offerman T., Potters J. and Verbon H. (2001) Cooperation in an overlapping generations experiment. Games and Economic Behavior, 36: 264275.
Oxoby R. and Spraggon J. (2008) Mine and yours: property rights in dictator games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 65: 703713.
Paetzel F., Sausgruber R. and Traub S. (2012) Social Preferences and Voting on Reform – An Experimental Study. Available online at
Rawls J. (1971) A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Riedl A. and van Winden F. A. A. M. (2007) An experimental investigation of wage taxation and unemployment in closed and open economies. European Economic Review, 51(4): 871900.
Riedl A. and van Winden F. A. A. M. (2012) Input versus output taxation in an experimental international economy. European Economic Review, 56(2): 216232.
Ruffle B. J. (1998) More is better, but fair is fair: tipping in dictator and ultimatum games. Games and Economic Behavior, 23: 247265.
Schokkaert E. and Capeau B. (1991) Interindividual differences in opinions about distributive justice. Kyklos, 44: 325345.
Schokkaert E. and Overlaet B. (1989) Moral intuitions and economic models of distributive justice. Social Choice and Welfare, 6(1): 1931.
Sefton M. (1992) Incentives in simple bargaining games. Journal of Economic Psychology, 13: 263276.
Selten R. and Ockenfels A. (1998) An experimental solidarity game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 34: 517539.
Shayo M. and Harel A. (2012) Non-consequentialist voting. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 81: 299313.
Tyran J.-R. and Sausgruber R. (2006) A little fairness may induce a lot of redistribution in democracy. European Economic Review, 50(2): 469–85.
Yaari M. E. and Bar-Hillel M. (1984) On dividing justly. Social Choice and Welfare, 1: 124.
van der Heijden E., Nelissen J., Potters J. and Verbon H. (1997) Intergenerational transfers and private savings: an experimental study. Kyklos, 50(2): 207220.
van der Heijden E., Nelissen J., Potters J. and Verbon H. (1998) Transfers and the effect of monitoring in an overlapping-generations experiment. European Economic Review, 42: 13631391.
van der Lecq S. and Steenbeek O. (2007) Introduction. In van der Lecq S. and Steenbeek O. (eds), Costs and Benefits of Collective Pension Systems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Pension Economics & Finance
  • ISSN: 1474-7472
  • EISSN: 1475-3022
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-pension-economics-and-finance
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 30 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 255 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.