Hostname: page-component-6b989bf9dc-vmcqm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-15T02:06:02.369Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Saving incentives, old-age provision and displacement effects: evidence from the recent German pension reform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2008

AXEL BÖRSCH-SUPAN ,
ANETTE REIL-HELD  and
DANIEL SCHUNK
AXEL BÖRSCH-SUPAN
Affiliation:
Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Aging (MEA), Mannheim University
ANETTE REIL-HELD
Affiliation:
Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Aging (MEA), Mannheim University (e-mail: reil-held@mea.uni-mannheim.de)
DANIEL SCHUNK
Affiliation:
Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In response to population aging, pay-as-you-go pensions are being reduced in almost all developed countries. In many countries, governments aim to fill the resulting gap with subsidized private pensions. This paper exploits the recent German pension reform to shed new light on the uptake of voluntary, but heavily subsidized private pension schemes. Specifically, we investigate how the uptake of the recently introduced ‘Riester pensions’ depends on state-provided saving incentives, and how well the targeting at families and low-income households works in practice.

We show that, after a slow start, private pension plans took off very quickly. While saving incentives were effective in reaching parents, they were less successful in attracting low-income earners, although Riester pensions exhibit a more equal pattern by income than occupational pensions and unsubsidized private pension plans.

We also provide circumstantial evidence on displacement effects between saving for old-age provision and other purposes. Households who plan to purchase housing are less likely to have a Riester pension. The same holds for households who attach high importance to a bequest motive. Occupational pensions and other forms of private pensions, however, act as complements rather than as substitutes.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Pension Economics & Finance , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , November 2008 , pp. 295 - 319
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boeri, T., Börsch-Supan, A., and Tabellini, G. (2002) Would you like to reform the pension system? The opionions of European citizens. American Economic Review, 92: 396–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Börsch-Supan, A. (ed.) (2003) Life-Cycle Savings and Public Policy: A Cross-National Study of Six Countries. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Börsch-Supan, A. (2004) Mind the gap incentives: the effectiveness of incentives to boost retirement savings in Europe. OECD Economic Studies, 39: 111–144.Google Scholar
Börsch-Supan, A. and Essig, L. (2005) Household saving in Germany: results of the first SAVE study. In Wise, D. A. (ed.) Analyses in the Economics of Aging. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 317–52.Google Scholar
Börsch-Supan, A., Coppola, M., Eymann, A., Essig, L., and Schunk, D. (2008) The German SAVE study: design and results. MEA Study No. 6. MEA – Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Aging, University of Mannheim, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Bundesministerium für Arbeit and Soziales (2006) Renten- und Alterssicherungsbericht 2005, http://www.bmas.de, Berlin.Google Scholar
Commission for the Sustainable Financing of the German Social Security System (2004) Bericht der Kommission. German Federal Ministry for Health and Social Affairs, Berlin.Google Scholar
Deutsche, Bundesbank (2002) Funded old-age provision and the financial markets. Monthly Report July 2002: 25–39. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Disney, R., Emmerson, C., and Wakefield, M. (2001) Pension reform and saving in Britain. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 17(1): 70–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dünn, S. and Fasshauer, S. (2003) Ein Jahr Riesterrente – Eine Übersicht aus Sicht der gesetzlichen Rentenversicherung. Deutsche Rentenversicherung 1–2.Google Scholar
Essig, L. (2005) Methodological aspects of the SAVE data set. MEA Discussion-Paper 80-05. MEA – Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Aging, University of Mannheim.Google Scholar
Essig, L. and Winter, J. (2003) Item nonresponse to financial questions in household surveys: An experimental study of interviewer and mode effects. MEA Discussion Paper 39-03. MEA – Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Aging, University of Mannheim.Google Scholar
Gale, W. J. and Scholz, J. K. (1994) IRAs and household saving. American Economic Review, 84: 1233–60.Google Scholar
German Federal Ministry for Health and Social Security (2005) National strategy report on old-age pension provision. http://www.bmas.band.de/BMAS/Redaktion/Pdf/Publikationen/national-strategy-report-on-old-age-pension-provision.Google Scholar
Hoynes, H., Hurd, M., and Chand, H. (1998) Household wealth of the elderly under alternative imputation procedures. In Wise, D. A. (ed.) Inquiries in the Economics of Aging, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 229–57.Google Scholar
Kennickell, A. B. (1998) multiple imputation in the survey of consumer finances. Proceedings of the 1998 Joint Statistical Meetings, Dallas TX.Google Scholar
Kriete-Dodds, S. and Vorgrimler, D. (2007) Staatliche Förderung der Riester-Rente für das Jahr 2002. Wirtschaft and Statistik 3/2007.Google Scholar
Lang, O. (2000) Steueranreize and Geldanlage im Lebenszyklus: empirische Analysen zu Spar- and Portfolioentscheidungen deutscher Privathaushalte. Baden-Baden: Nomos-Verlags-Gesellschaft.Google Scholar
Lusardi, A. (1999) Information, expectations, and savings for retirement. In Aaron, H. J. (ed.) Behavioral Dimensions of Retirement Economics, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press and Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 81–115.Google Scholar
Lusardi, A. and Mitchell, O. (2006) Financial literacy and planning: implications for retirement wellbeing. Wharton School Discussion Paper, University of Pennsylvania.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madrian, B. and Shea, D. (2001) The power of suggestion: inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4): 1149–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruprecht, W. (2004) Automatische Entgeltumwandlung in der betrieblichen Altersversor-gung – eine Replik. Wirtschaftsdienst, 10: 651–6.Google Scholar
Schunk, D. (2006) The German SAVE Survey: documentation and methodology. MEA Discussion-Paper 109-06. MEA – Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Aging, University of Mannheim.Google Scholar
Schunk, D. (2008) A Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm for multiple imputation in large surveys. Advances in Statistical Analysis, 92(1): 101–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schunk, D. and Winter, J. (2007) The relationship between risk attitudes and heuristics in search tasks: a laboratory experiment. Münchener Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Beiträge (VWL) 2007–9.Google Scholar
Skinner, J. and Hubbard, R. G. (1996) Assessing the effectiveness of saving incentives. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(4): 73–90.Google Scholar
Sommer, Mathias (2007) Fiskalische Auswirkungen einer Erweiterung des Förderrahmens von Riesterrenten. MEA Discussion Paper 122-07. MEA – Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Aging, University of Mannheim.Google Scholar
Stolz, U. and Rieckhoff, C. (2005) Aktuelle Ergebnisse der zulagengeförderten Alters-vorsorge. Die AngestelltenVersicherung, 9/05, 409–16.Google Scholar
Stolz, U. and Rieckhoff, C. (2006) Zulagenzahlungen der zentralen Zulagestelle für Altersvermögen – Auswertungen für das Beitragsjahr 2003. RV-aktuell 08/06, 306–13.Google Scholar
Venti, S. and Wise, D. (1990) Have IRAs increased US Savings? Evidence from consumer expenditure surveys. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105: 661–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar