Hostname: page-component-f7d5f74f5-vmlfj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-10-03T18:23:18.566Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "coreDisableSocialShare": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForArticlePurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForBookPurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForElementPurchase": false, "coreUseNewShare": true, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

Carbon allowances and the demand for offsets: a comprehensive assessment of imperfect substitutes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2015

Noah C. Dormady
John Glenn College of Public Affairs, Ohio State University, USA E-mail:
Gabriel Englander
Department of Economics, Ohio State University, USA


The efficient use of market-based policy instruments is an area of increasing importance as scholars and policymakers work to balance effective climate policy with economic growth. Carbon allowances and carbon offsets, despite being statutorily substitutable, behave in practice like imperfect substitutes. This paper provides a synthesis of extant work, market data and the regulatory frameworks of the world’s major carbon markets, and provides a comprehensive assessment of the drivers of demand for carbon offsets. It also provides a detailed assessment of the process through which international carbon offsets are produced, the UN’s Clean Development Mechanism. Demand for carbon offsets is heavily influenced by key programme design parameters that are specific to carbon market design and its implementation. These design parameters heavily influence the degree to which transaction costs, regulatory uncertainty and risk factor into the decisions of firms operating within the carbon trading programme. This paper also identifies key extra-statutory drivers that are outside of the policymaker’s control, which should be considered in both the policy design and the implementation process. This paper provides an instructive set of guiding criteria for policymakers and scholars for the design of future market-based environmental policy.

Field Essay
© Cambridge University Press, 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Alberola, E. and Chevallier, J. (2009) European Carbon Prices and Banking Restrictions: Evidence from Phase I (2005–2007). The Energy Journal 30(3): 5179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alberola, E., Chevallier, J. and Chèze, B. (2008a) Price Drivers and Structural Breaks in European Carbon Prices 2005–2007. Energy Policy 36(2): 787797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alberola, E., Chevallier, J. and Chèze, B. (2008b) The EU Emissions Trading Scheme: the Effects of Industrial Production and CO2 Emissions on European Carbon Prices. International Economics 116: 93126.Google Scholar
Arimura, T. (2002) An Empirical Study of the SO2 Allowance Market: Effects of PUC Regulations. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44(2): 271289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Averch, H. and Johnson, L. L. (1962) Behavior of the Firm under Regulatory Constraint. American Economic Review 52(5): 10521069.Google Scholar
Benz, E. and Trück, S. (2009) Modeling the Price Dynamics of CO2 Emission Allowances. Energy Economics 31(1): 415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borenstein, S., Bushnell, J. B. and Wolak, F. A. (2002) Measuring Market Inefficiencies in California’s Restructured Wholesale Electricity Market. American Economic Review 92(5): 13761405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bredin, D. and Muckley, C. (2011) An Emerging Equilibrium in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme. Energy Economics 33(2): 353362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burtraw, D. and Mansur, E. (1999) The Effects of Trading and Banking in the SO2 Allowance Market. Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 99–25, Google Scholar
Bushnell, J. (2010) The Economics of Carbon Offsets. NBER Working Paper No. 16305, Google Scholar
California Air and Resources Board (CARB) (2009) Example Base Allowance Budgets for the California Cap-and-Trade Program, (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
California Air and Resources Board (CARB) (2013) Topics Subject to Potential Regulatory Amendments, (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
California Air and Resources Board (CARB) (2015) Compliance Offset Program, (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
California Carbon (2014) Offsets, (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
California Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2010) Staff Report and Compliance Protocol: U.S. Forestry Project, (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
California Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2011) Compliance Offset Protocol Urban Forest Projects, (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
Carbon Market Watch (2013) Joint Implementation: CDM’s Little Brother Grew Up to be Big and Nasty, (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
Carbon Retirement (2009) The Efficiency of Carbon Offsetting Through the CDM, (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
Chan, G., Stavins, R., Stowe, R. and Sweeney, R. (2012) The SO2 Allowance Trading System and the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990: Reflections on Twenty Years of Policy Innovation. NBER Working Paper Series 17845.Google Scholar
Chevallier, J. (2012) Banking and Borrowing in the EU ETS: A Review of Economic Modelling, Current Provisions and Prospects for Future Design. Journal of Economic Surveys 26(1): 157176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Climate Action Reserve (2013) Buyer Liability Insurance Now Available for California’s Cap-and-Trade Offset Program, (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
Coase, R. (1960) The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3: 144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Considine, T. and Larson, D. (2012) Short Term Electric Production Technology Switching Under Carbon Cap and Trade. Energies 5(10): 41654185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cormier, A. and Bellassen, V. (2012) The Risks of CDM Projects: How Did Only 30% of Expected Offsets Come Through? Energy Policy 54: 173183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creti, A., Jouvet, P. A. and Mignon, V. (2012) Carbon Price Drivers: Phase I versus Phase II Equilibrium? Energy Economics 34(1): 327334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dales, J. (1968) Pollution, Property and Prices. Toronto: University Press.Google Scholar
Delarue, E. D. and D’Haeseleer, W. D. (2007) Price Determination of ETS Allowances Through the Switching Level of Coal and Gas in the Power Sector. International Journal of Energy Research 31(11): 10011015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Oultremont, C. (2010) The EU’s Emissions Trading Scheme: Achievements, Key Lessons, and Future Prospects. Egmont Paper No. 40, December 2010, (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
Dutschke, M. and Schlamadinger, B. (2003) Practical Issues Concerning Temporary Carbon Credits in the CDM. HWWA Discussion Paper No. 227, (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
Ellerman, D. A., Convery, F. J. and Perthuis, C. (2010) Pricing Carbon: The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, H., Gephart, N., Goldstein, A. and Stevenson, S. (2013) Demand for Carbon Offsets in the United States: A Snapshot of US Buyers on the Global Voluntary and California Compliance Markets, (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
European Commission (EC) (2011a) Commission Regulation (EU) No 550/2011, (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
European Commission (EC) (2011b) Emissions Trading: Commission Welcomes Vote to Ban Certain Industrial Gas Credits, (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
European Commission (EC) (2013a) International Carbon Market, (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
European Commission (EC) (2013b) Draft European Commission Regulation, (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
European Commission (EC) (2013c) Climate Change Committee Approves Proposed Regulation on International Credits Entitlements 2013, (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
European Commission (EC) (2013d) Emissions Trading: 2012 Saw Continuing Decline in Emissions but Growing Surplus of Allowances, (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
Evolution Markets (2012) California Carbon Markets: An Overview of the Trading Activity in California’s Cap and Trade Market, (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
Hintermann, B. (2010) Allowance Price Drivers in the First Phase of the ETS. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 59(1): 4356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, S. (2002) Making Competition Work in Electricity. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
IPCC/TEAP (2005) Special Report on Safeguarding the Ozone Layer and the Global Climate System: Issues Related to Hydrofluorocarbons and Perfluorocarbons, (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
Jaraite, J., Convery, F. and Di Maria, C. (2010) Transaction Costs for Firms in the EU ETS: Lessons from Ireland. Climate Policy 10(2): 190215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaraite, J. and Kažukauskas, A. (2012) Firm Trading Behaviour and Transaction Costs in the European Union’s Emission Trading System: An Empirical Assessment. CERE Working Paper 9, (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
Kachi, A., Taenzler, D. and Sterk, W. (2012) Prospects for CDM in Post 2012 Carbon Markets, (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
Kollmuss, A. and Lazarus, M. (2011) Discounting Offsets: Issues and Options. Carbon Management 2(5): 539549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langrock, T. and Sterk, W. (2004) The Supplementarity Challenge: CDM, JI and EU Emissions Trading. Policy Paper 1, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy, (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
Lutz, B. J., Pigorsch, U. and Rotfuss, W. (2013) Nonlinearity in Cap-and-Trade Systems: The EUA Price and its Fundamentals. ZEW – Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper No. 13-001, (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
Mansanet-Bataller, M., Chevallier, J., Herve-Mignucci, M. and Alberola, E. (2011) EUA and sCER Phase II Price Drivers: Unveiling the Reasons for the Existence of the EUA-sCER spread. Energy Policy 39(3): 10561069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansanet-Bataller, M., Pardo, A. and Valor, E. (2007) CO2 Prices, Energy and Weather. The Energy Journal 28(3): 7392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marland, G., Fruit, K. and Sedjo, R. (2001) Accounting for Sequestered Carbon: the Question of Permanence. Environmental Science and Policy 4(6): 259268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaelowa, A. (2012) Linking the CDM with New and Emerging Carbon Markets. CDM Policy Dialogue, (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
Mignone, B. K., Hurteau, M. D., Chen, Y. and Sohngen, B. (2009) Carbon Offsets, Reversal Risk and US Climate Policy. Carbon Balance and Management 4(1): 16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moeller, L., Balmann, A. and Kataria, K. (2012) The Impact of Volatility in Bioenergy Investments: A Real Options Approach, (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
Montgomery, W. (1972) Markets in Licenses and Efficient Pollution Control Programs. Journal of Economic Theory 5(3): 395418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, D. and Fell, H. (2012) Cap-and-Trade in California: An Introduction to Offset Buyer Liability. Resources for the Future, (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
Mulkern, A. (2011) Offsets Could Make Up 85% of Calif.’s Cap-And-Trade Program. NY Times, (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
Murray, B. C., Galik, C. S., Mitchell, S. and Cottle, P. (2012) Alternative Approaches to Addressing the Risk of Non-Permanence in Afforestation and Reforestation Projects under the Clean Development Mechanism. Prepared for the World Bank Carbon Finance Unit, (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
Nazifi, F. (2013) Modeling the Price Spread between EUA and CER Carbon Prices. Energy Policy 56: 434445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Point Carbon (2012) Use of Offsets for Compliance within ETS up 86% on 2011, (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
Point Carbon (2013) Low CER Prices Leave Chinese CDM Contracts in Disarray, (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
Point Carbon (2014) Program Design: Quebec, (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
RGGI (2006) Analysis Supporting Offsets Limit Recommendation, (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
RGGI (2013) RGGI States Propose Lowering Regional CO2 Emissions Cap 45%, (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
Roberto, C. and Dormady, N. (2013) The Costs of Inefficiency: Ignoring Ohio’s Energy Efficiency Potential, (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
Schneider, R. L. (2011) Perverse Incentives under the CDM: An Evaluation of HFC-23 Destruction Projects. Climate Policy 11(2): 851864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohngen, B. and Mendelsohn, R. (2003) An Optimal Control Model of Forest Carbon Sequestration. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(2): 448457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stavins, R. (1995) Transaction Costs and Tradeable Permits. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29(2): 133148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, B. and Rose, A. (2002) A Dynamic Analysis of the Marketable Permits Approach to Global Warming Policy: A Comparison of Spatial and Temporal Flexibility. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44(1): 4569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tietenberg, T. H. (2006) Emissions Trading: Principles and Practice. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
Tietenberg, T. H. and Lewis, L. (2012) Environmental and Natural Resource Economics, 9th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
Trotignon, R. (2012) Combining Cap-and-Trade with Offsets: Lessons from the EU-ETS. Climate Policy 12(3): 273287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNFCCC (2006) Modalities and Procedures for a Clean Development Mechanism, (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
UNFCCC (2013) Project Activities, (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
Wara, M. (2008) Measuring the Clean Development Mechanism’s Performance and Potential. UCLA Law Review 55(6): 17591803.Google Scholar
Wara, M. and Victor, D. (2008) A Realistic Policy on International Carbon Offsets. Program on Energy and Sustainable Development, Working Paper 74, (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1975) Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Woerdman, E. (2004) The Institutional Economics of Market-Based Climate Policy. Boston: Elsevier.Google Scholar