Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-ssw5r Total loading time: 0.385 Render date: 2022-08-13T05:56:24.714Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

The evolution of human trafficking messaging in the United States and its effect on public opinion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2018

Tabitha Bonilla
Affiliation:
Institute of Policy Research, Northwestern University, USA E-mail: tabitha.bonilla@northwestern.edu
Cecilia Hyunjung Mo
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley, USA E-mail: cecilia.h.mo@berkeley.edu

Abstract

Despite a near unanimous agreement that human trafficking is a morally reprehensible practice, there is confusion around what qualifies as human trafficking in the United States. Adopting a mixed-method strategy, we examine how human trafficking is defined by the public; how contemporary (mis)understanding of human trafficking developed; and the public opinion consequence of this (mis)understanding. The definition of human trafficking has evolved over time to become nearly synonymous with slavery; however, we demonstrate that media and anti-trafficking organisations have been focussing their attention on the sexual exploitation of foreign women. We show that general public opinion reflects this skewed attention; the average citizen equates human trafficking with the smuggling of women for sexual slavery. Using a survey experiment, we find that shining light on other facets of human trafficking – the fact that human trafficking is a security problem and a domestic issue – can increase public response to the issue.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baum, M. A. and Potter, P. B. K. (2008) The Relationships Between Mass Media, Public Opinion, and Foreign Policy: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis. Annual Review of Political Science 11: 3965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, J. (2012) Campaigning for Justice: Human Rights Advocacy in Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Benford, R. and Snow, D. (2000) Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 26: 611639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, I. (1976) The Structure of the Free Negro Caste in the Antebellum United States. Journal of Social History 9(3): 297318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, C. (2003) The Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000: Three Years Later. Data and Perspectives 41: 219231.Google Scholar
Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y. and Jordan, M. I. (2003) Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research 3: 9931022.Google Scholar
Brysk, A. (1993) From Above and Below Social Movements, the International System, and Human Rights in Argentina. Comparative Political Studies 26(3): 259285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstein, P. (1991) Policy Domains: Organization, Culture, and Policy Outcomes. Annual Review of Sociology 17: 327350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, B., Milgram, A., Kim, K. and Warnath, S. (2014) Human Trafficking Law and Policy. New Providence, NJ: LexisNexis Law School Publishing.Google Scholar
Chandler, D. G. (2001) The Road to Military Humanitarianism: How the Human Rights NGOs Shaped a New Humanitarian Agenda. Human Rights Quarterly 23(3): 678700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chong, D. and Druckman, J. N. (2007) A Theory of Framing and Opinion Formation in Competitive Elite Environments. Journal of Communication 57(1): 99118.Google Scholar
Clawson, H., Dutch, N., Solomon, A. and Grace, L. G. (2009) Human Trafficking Into and Within the United States: A Review of the Literature. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, https://aspe.hhs.gov/basic-report/human-trafficking-and-within-united-states-review-literature (accessed 22 January 2018).Google Scholar
Danailova-Trainor, G. and Laczko, F. (2010) Trafficking in Persons and Development: Towards Greater Policy Coherence. International Migration 48: 3883.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Desyllas, M. C. (2007) A Critique of the Global Trafficking Discourse and U.S. Policy. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare 34(4): 5779.Google Scholar
Doezema, J. (1998) Forced to Choose: Beyond the Voluntary v. Forced Prostitution Dichotomy. In Kempadoo K. and Doezema J. (eds.), Global Sex Workers: Rights, Resistance, and Redefinition. New York, NY: Routledge, 3450.Google Scholar
Doezema, J. (1999) Loose Women or Lost Women? The Re-Emergence of the Myth of White Slavery in Contemporary Discourses of Trafficking in Women. Gender Issues 18(1): 2350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doezema, J. (2002) Who Gets to Choose? Coercion, Consent, and the UN Trafficking Protocol. Gender & Development 10(1): 2027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DOJ, HHS, DOS, DOL, DHS, and USAID (2006) Assessment of U.S. Government Efforts to Combat Trafficking in Persons in Fiscal Year 2005. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Druckman, J. N. (2001) On the Limits of Framing Effects: Who Can Frame? The Journal of Politics 63(4): 10411066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, J. N. (2004) Political Preference Formation: Competition, Deliberation, and the (Ir)relevance of Framing Effects. American Political Science Review 98(4): 671686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, J. N. and Kam, C. D. (2011) Students as Experimental Participants: A Defense of the “Narrow Data Base”. In Druckman, J. N., Green D. P., Kuklinski J. H. and Lupia A. (eds.), Handbook of Experimental Political Science. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 4157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Entman, R. M. (1993) Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication 43: 5158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, A. and Fahy, S. (2009) The Problem of Human Trafficking in the U.S.: Public Frames and Policy Responses. Journal of Criminal Justice 37(6): 617626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feingold, D. A. (2005) Human Trafficking. Foreign Policy 150: 2630, 32.Google Scholar
Free the Slaves (2004) Hidden Slaves: Forced Labor in the United States. Washington, DC and Berkeley, CA: Free the Slaves and Human Rights Center University of California.Google Scholar
Gould, A. J. (2010) From Pseudoscience to Protoscience: Estimating Human Trafficking and Modern Forms of Slavery. Presented at the Second Annual Interdisciplinary Conference on Human Trafficking, Lincoln, Nebraska.Google Scholar
Gozdziak, E. M. and Collett, E. A. (2005) Research on Human Trafficking in North America: A Review of Literature. International Migration 43(1–2): 99128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grittner, F. K. (1990) White Slavery: Myth, Ideology and American Law. New York, NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Gulati, G. J. (2011) News Frames and Story Triggers in the Media’s Coverage of Human Trafficking. Human Rights Review 12(3): 363379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guy, D. J. (1992) “White Slavery,” Citizenship and Nationality in Argentina. In Parker A. (ed.), Nationalisms and Sexualities. New York, NY: Routledge, 7285.Google Scholar
Hertel, S. (2006) Unexpected Power: Conflict and Change Among Transnational Activists. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hilgartner, S. and Bosk, C. L. (1988) The Rise and Fall of Social Problems: A Public Arenas Model. American Journal of Sociology 94: 5378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Labour Organization (2012) ILO Global Estimates of Forced Labor. Geneva, Switzerland: ILO.Google Scholar
Jahic, G. and Finckenauer, J. (2005) Representations and Misrepresentations of Human Representations and Misrepresentations of Human Trafficking. Trends in Organized Crime 8(3): 2440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandathil, R. (2005) Global Sex Trafficking and the Trafficking Victims Protection act of 2000: Legislative Responses to the Problem of Modern Slavery. Michigan Journal of Gender & Law 12: 87118.Google Scholar
Kempadoo, K. and Doezema, J. (1998) Global Sex Workers: Rights, Resistance, and Redefinition. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kingdon, J. W. (1984) Agendas, Alternative and Public Policy. New York, NY: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Klandermans, B. (1988) The Formation and Mobilization of Consensus. In Klandermans B., Kriesi H. and Tarrow S. (eds.), International Social Movement Research. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 173196.Google Scholar
Koettl, J. (2009) Human Trafficking, Modern Day Slavery, and Economic Exploitation. SP Discussion Paper, No. 0911. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Laczko, F. (2007) Enhancing Data Collection and Reasearch on Trafficking in Persons. In Savona E. U. and Stefanizzi S. (eds.), Measuring Human Trafficking: Complexities and Pitfalls. New York, NY: Springer, 3744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCallum, A. (2002) MALLET: A Machine Learning for Language Toolkit, http://mallet.cs.umass.edu (accessed 1 January 2014).Google Scholar
McCombs, M. (2004) Setting the Agenda: The Mass Media and Public Opinion. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, F. and McWhiney, G. (1980) The South from Self-sufficiency to Peonage: An Interpretation. The American Historical Review 85(5): 10951118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEntire, K. J., Leiby, M. and Krain, M. (2015) How to Ask People for Change: Examining Peoples’ Willingness to Donate to Human Rights Campaigns. In Pruce J. R. (ed.), Social Practice of Human Rights. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morcom, C. and Schloenhardt, A. (2011) All About Sex?! The Evolution of Trafficking in Persons in International Law. The University of Queensland Human Trafficking Working Group, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
National Human Trafficking Resource Center (NHTRC) (2016) Hotline Statistics, https://humantraffickinghotline.org/states (accessed 1 April 2016).Google Scholar
Polaris (2016) 2015 Hotline Statistics. Polaris Project.Google Scholar
Potter, G. W. and Kappeler, V. E. (1998) Construction Crime: Perspectives on Making News and Social Problems. Chicago, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Ransom, R. L. and Sutch, R. (1972) Debt Peonage in the Cotton South After the Civil War. The Journal of Economic History 32(3): 641669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, J. G. and Hughes, D. M. (2001) Sex Trafficking of Women in the United States: International and Domestic Trends. Coalition Against Trafficking of Women.Google Scholar
Rieger, A. (2006) Missing the Mark: Why the Trafficking Victims Protection Act Fails to Protect Sex Trafficking Victims in the United States. Harvard Journal of Law & Gender 30: 231256.Google Scholar
Saunders, P. and Soderlund, G. (2003) Traveling Threats: Sexuality, Gender and the Ebb and Flow of Trafficking as Discourse. Canadian Woman Studies 22: 3546.Google Scholar
Scarpa, S. (2008) Trafficking in Human Beings: Modern Slavery. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, B. A. and Lloyd, P. (2015) Framing and Transnational Legal Organization: The Case of Human Trafficking. In Halliday T. C. and Shaffer G. (eds.), Transnational Legal Organization. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 400438.Google Scholar
Soderlund, G. (2005) Running from the Rescuers: New U.S. Crusades Against Sex Trafficking and the Rhetoric of Abolition. NWSA Journal 17: 264287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surrette, R. (1992) Media: Crime and Criminal Justice. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
71st US Congress (1930) Tariff Act of 1930. H.R. 2667 (PL 71-361), 17 June.Google Scholar
106th US Congress (2000) Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000. H.R.3244 (PL 106-386), 28 October, https://www.congress.gov/bill/106th-congress/house-bill/3244 (accessed 2 December 2015).Google Scholar
US Department of Homeland Security (2015) Human Trafficking Laws and Regulations. 22 September, http://www.dhs.gov/human-trafficking-laws-regulations (accessed 2 December 2015).Google Scholar
US Department of State (2014) 2014 Trafficking in Persons Report. Washington, DC: US Department of State.Google Scholar
US Department of State (2015) U.S. Laws on Trafficking in Persons, http://go.usa.gov/3yUBT (accessed 6 December 2015).Google Scholar
Walk Free Foundation (2014) The Global Slavery Index 2014. Claremont, WA: Hope for Children Organization Australia Ltd.Google Scholar
Wong, W. H. (2012) Internal Affairs: How the Structure of NGOs Transforms Human Rights. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Slavery Index (2016) Country Study: United States, http://www.globalslaveryindex.org/ country/united-states (accessed 1 April 2016).Google Scholar
Zaller, J. (1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, S. X. (2012) Looking for a Hidden Population: Trafficking of Migrant Laborers in San Diego County. San Diego, CA: San Diego State University.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Y. C. (2005) Situating the Ninety-Nine: A Critique of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act. Journal of Religion and Abuse 7: 3756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Bonilla and Mo supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Bonilla and Mo supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 135 KB
5
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The evolution of human trafficking messaging in the United States and its effect on public opinion
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The evolution of human trafficking messaging in the United States and its effect on public opinion
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The evolution of human trafficking messaging in the United States and its effect on public opinion
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *