Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T19:44:46.048Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Charges as Contested Signals*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Richard Rose
Richard Rose
Affiliation:
Public Policy, University of Strathclyde
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Government is about the supply and demand for many goods and services, but votes or social needs are the principal signal meant to give direction to public policy. Many neo-liberal economists contest this, arguing that charges or user-fees are more efficient for allocating services. Empirical analysis shows that in principle it would be possible to impose charges on three-quarters of the goods and services financed by government. Although some charges are imposed on a wide variety of public programmes, overall governments reject marketing what is marketable. Theoretical inconsistencies in government's use of charges indicate that they reflect political inertia. The conclusion offers an analytic paradigm for interpreting charges, since an accurate interpretation of the signals sent by charges depends upon attributes specific to a given public programme.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , July 1989 , pp. 261 - 286
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnett, Joel (1982) Inside the Treasury (London: Andre Deutsch).Google Scholar
Birch, S. (1986) ‘Instructing Patient Charges in the National Health Service’, Journal ofSocial Policy, 15, 2, 163–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Richard M. (1976) Charging for Public Services: a New Look at an Old Idea (Canadian Tax Foundation).Google Scholar
Congressional Budget Office (1983) Charging for Federal Services (Washington DC: Government Printing Office).Google Scholar
Davies, Blcddyn (1980) ‘Policy Options for Charges and Means Tests’, in Judge, K., ed., Pricing the Social Services, 132–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, Patricia and Klein, Rudolf (1987) Accountabilities (London: Tavistock).Google Scholar
Flora, Peter (1983) State, Economy and Society in Western Europe 1813–1975 (London: Macmillan, vol. 1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, Peggy (1983) Access to Welfare: an Introduction to Welfare Rationing. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M. and Friedman, R. (1980) Free to Choose (London: Seeker & Warburg).Google Scholar
GAO (General Accounting Office) (1980) The Congress Should Consider Exploring Opportunities to Expand and Improve the Application of User Charges by Federal Agencies (Washington DC: Comptroller General of the United States, PAD-80-25).Google Scholar
Gillette, Clayton P. and Hopkins, Thomas D. (1987) ‘Federal User Fees: A Legal and Economic Analysis’, Boston University Law Review 67, 5, 795–874.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert E. (1989) ‘Stars to Steer By: The Political Impact ofMoral Values’, Journal of Public Policy 9, 3, supra.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F. (1945) ‘The Use of Knowledge in Society‘, American Economic Review, 35, 519–530.Google Scholar
Heald, David (1983) Public Expenditure (Oxford: Martin Robertson).Google Scholar
Heald, David (1989) Charging by British Government: Evidence from the Public Expenditure Survey (Glasgow:U of Strathclydc Studies in Public Policy No. 173).Google Scholar
Hood, C., Huby, M. and Dunsirc, A. (1984) ‘Bureaucrats and Budgeting Benefits’, Journal of Public Policy 4, 3, 163–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Monetary Fund (1986) A Manual on Government Finance Statistics (Washington DC: IMF).Google Scholar
Jimenez, Emmanuel (1987) Pricing Policy in the Social Sectors: Cost Recovery for Education and Health in Developing Countries. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Judge, Ken (1980) ‘An Introduction to the Economic Theory of Pricing’, in Judge, ed. Pricing the Social Services (London: Macmillan) 46–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judge, Ken and Matthews, James (1980) Charging for Social Care (London: George Allen & Unwin).Google Scholar
Julius, DeAnne and Alicbusan, Adelaida P. (1988) ‘Public Sector Pricing Policies: a Review of Bank Policy and Practice’. Washington: World Bank, duplicated.Google Scholar
Kelman, Steven (1981) What Price Incentives? Economists and the Environment (Boston: Auburn House).Google Scholar
Lasswell, Harold (1958) Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. New York: World Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Letwin, William (1986) ‘Charge More and Standards Too Will Rise’, The Times, 21 07.Google Scholar
McDaniel, Paul and Surrey, Stanley, eds. (1985) International Aspects of Tax Expenditures: a Comparative Study (Devcnter, the Netherlands: Kluwer).Google Scholar
McLean, Iain and Poulton, Jo (1986) ‘Good Blood, Bad Blood and the Market: The Gift Relationship Revisited ’, Journal of Public Policy 6, 4, 431–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, T. H. (1950) Citizenship and Social Class (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Musgrave, R. A. (1987) ‘Merit Goods’, in Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P., eds., The New Palgrave (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
Musgrave, R. A. and Musgrave, P. (1980) Public Finance in Theory and Practice (New York: McGraw-Hill).Google Scholar
OECD (1986) Revenue Statistics, 1963–1985 (Paris: OECD).Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur C. Jr. (1965) The Logic of Collective Action (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OMB (Office of Management and Budget) (1988) Enhancing Governmental Production Through Competition (Washington DC: OMB Office of Federal Procurement Policy).Google Scholar
Parker, R. A. (1980) ‘Policies, Presumptions and Prospects in Charging for the Social Services’, in Judge (1980), 24–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, R. (1984) Public Enterprises Economics (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2nd ed.)Google Scholar
Ridley, Nicholas (1989) Policies against Pollution. London: Centre for Policy Studies.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard (1976) ‘On the Priorities of Government’, European Journal of Political Research, 4, 3, 247–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Richard (1985) ‘Maximizing Tax Revenues while Minimizing Political Costs’, Journal of Public Policy 5, 3, 289–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Richard (1986) ‘The Dynamics ofthe Welfare Mix in Britain’ in Rose, and Shiratori, R., eds., The Welfare State East and West (New York: Oxford University Press) 80–106.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard (1989) Ordinary People in Public Policy (London: Sage Publications).Google Scholar
Rose, Richard (forthcoming) ‘Inheritance beforeChoicc in Public Policy’, Journal ofTheoretical Politics.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard and Karran, Terence (1987) Taxation by Inertia: Financing the Growth of Government in Britain (London: George Allen & Unwin).Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. (1954) ‘The Pure Theory ofPublic Expenditure’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 36 (11), 387–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultze, Charles L. (1977) The Public Use of Private Interest (Washington DC: The Brookings Institution).Google Scholar
Seldon, Arthur (1977) Charge (London: Temple Smith).Google Scholar
Stewart, Murray (1980) ‘Issues in Pricing Policy ’, in Judge (1980), 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straw, Jack MP (1987) ‘Parental Contributions to the Cost of School Activities’ (London: House of Commons, duplicated).Google Scholar
Taylor, Robert and Webb, Sara (1989) ‘A Champion of Market Socialism: Kjell-Olof Fcldt’, Financial Times, 17 04.Google Scholar
Titmuss, R. M. (1970) The Gift Relationship (London: George Allen & Unwin).Google Scholar
Walsh, Cliff( 1987) ‘Individual Irrationality and Public Policy: In Search of Merit/Demerit Policies’, Journal of Public Policy 7, 2, 103–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, R. Kent (1986) ‘The Politics of Blame Avoidance’, Journal ofPublic Policy 6, 4, 371–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildavsky, Aaron (1985) ‘Keeping Kosher: the Epistemology of Tax Expenditures’, Journal of Public policy 5, 3, 401–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildavsky, Aaron (1988) The New Politics ofthe Budgetary Process. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Wolf, Charles D. (1987) ‘Market and Non-Market Failures’, Journal ofPublic Policy 7, 1, 43–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank (1986) Financing Education in Developing Countries: an Exploration of Policy Options. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank (1988) World Development Report 1988. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar