Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Competition in local land use planning?

  • Jan Berli (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

The extent of political fragmentation of metropolitan areas impedes effective land use planning in many countries, and thus contributes to the phenomenon of urban sprawl. For some metropolises in the United States and Europe, strategic interaction between local policymakers codetermines the implementation of local planning policies. However, previous empirical analyses of this phenomenon have usually assumed interdependence in planning decisions to be confined to neighbouring jurisdictions. This is a common simplification in research on diffusion in public policies. Proceeding on the assumption that municipal zoning decisions are subject to competition between municipal authorities trying to attract new residents, I suggest an alternative conceptualisation of location-choice competition in Tiebout-like economies: the correlations of out-commuting patterns serve as a proxy for the degree to which municipalities are competitors for mobile residents, irrespective of their contiguity. Spatial autoregressive models, estimated on the basis of a large panel of fine-grained zoning data, reveal that zoning decisions in the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland’s most dynamic metropolitan area, are indeed subject to such interdependence.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

M. A. Bailey and M. C. Rom (2004) A Wider Race? Interstate Competition Across Health and Welfare Programs. Journal of Politics 66(2): 326347.

N. Beck , K. S. Gleditsch and K. Beardsley (2006) Space is More than Geography: Using Spatial Econometrics in the Study of Political Economy. International Studies Quarterly 50(1): 2744.

D. Braun and F. Gilardi (2006) Taking “Galton’s Problem” Seriously: Towards a Theory of Policy Diffusion. Journal of Theoretical Politics 18(3): 298322.

T. S. Breusch and A. R. Pagan (1979) A Simple Test for Heteroscedasticity Random Coefficient Variation. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 47(5): 12871294.

J. K. Brueckner (1990) Growth Controls and Land Values in an Open City. Land Economics 66(3): 237248.

J. K. Brueckner (1995) Strategic Control of Growth in a System of Cities. Journal of Public Economics 57(3): 393416.

J. K. Brueckner (1998) Testing for Strategic Interaction Among Local Governments: The Case of Growth Controls. Journal of Urban Economics 44(3): 438467.

J. K. Brueckner (2000) Urban Sprawl: Diagnosis and Remedies. International Regional Science Review 23(2): 160171.

J. K. Brueckner (2003) Strategic Interaction Among Governments: An Overview of Empirical Studies. International Regional Science Review 26(2): 175188.

R. S. Burt (1987) Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion Versus Structural Equivalence. American Journal of Sociology 92(6): 12871335.

P. Byun and A. X. Esparza (2005) A Revisionist Model of Suburbanization and Sprawl. Journal of Planning Education and Research 24(3): 252264.

P. Byun , B. S. Waldorf and A. X. Esparza (2005) Spillovers and Local Growth Controls: An Alternative Perspective on Suburbanization. Growth and Change 36(2): 196219.

S. Calabrese , D. Epple and R. Romano (2007) On the Political Economy of Zoning. Journal of Public Economics 91(1-2): 2549.

X. Cao (2010) Networks as Channels of Policy Diffusion: Explaining Worldwide Changes in Capital Taxation, 1998–2006. International Studies Quarterly 54(3): 823854.

J. I. Carruthers and G. F. Ulfarsson (2002) Fragmentation and Sprawl: Evidence from Interregional Analysis. Growth and Change 33(3): 312340.

D. Christafore and S. Leguizamon (2015) Spatial Spillovers of Land Use Regulation in the United States. Housing Studies 30(3): 113.

J. Clingermayer (1993) Distributive Politics, Ward Representation, and the Spread of Zoning. Public Choice 77(4): 725738.

R. C. Ellickson (1977) Suburban Growth Controls: An Economic and Legal Analysis. Yale Law Journal 86(3): 385511.

R. Engle , P. Navarro and R. Carson (1992) On the Theory of Growth Controls. Journal of Urban Economics 32(3): 269283.

D. Epple and H. Sieg (1999) Estimating Equilibrium Models of Local Jurisdictions. Journal of Political Economy 107(4): 645681.

R. Fernandez and R. Rogerson (1997) Keeping People Out: Income Distribution, Zoning, and the Quality of Public Education. International Economic Review 38(1): 2342.

R. J. Florax , H. Folmer and S. J. Rey (2003) Specification Searches in Spatial Econometrics: The Relevance of Hendry’s Methodology. Regional Science and Urban Economics 33(5): 557579.

E. R. Gerber and J. H. Phillips (2004) Direct Democracy and Land Use Policy: Exchanging Public Goods for Development Rights. Urban Studies 41(2): 463479.

F. Gilardi (2016) Four Ways we Can Improve Policy Diffusion Research. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 16(1): 821.

E. R. Graham , C. R. Shipan and C. Volden (2013) The Diffusion of Policy Diffusion Research in Political Science. British Journal of Political Science 43(3): 673701.

J.-M. Halleux , S. Marcinczak and E. van der Krabben (2012) The Adaptive Efficiency of Land Use Planning Measured by the Control of Urban Sprawl. The Cases of the Netherlands, Belgium and Poland. Land Use Policy 29(4): 887898.

A. Hardman and Y. M. Ioannides (2004) Neighbors’ Income Distribution: Economic Segregation and Mixing in US Urban Neighborhoods. Journal of Housing Economics 13(4): 368382.

R. W. Helsley and W. C. Strange (1994) City Formation With Commitment. Regional Science and Urban Economics 24(3): 373390.

W. J. Henisz , B. A. Zelner and M. F. Guillén (2005) The Worldwide Diffusion of Market-Oriented Infrastructure Reform, 1977–1999. American Sociological Review 70(6): 871897.

A. M. Hersperger , M.-P. G. Franscini and D. Kübler (2014) Actors, Decisions and Policy Changes in Local Urbanization. European Planning Studies 22(6): 13011319.

C. A. Hilber and F. Robert-Nicoud (2013) On the Origins of Land Use Regulations: Theory and Evidence From US Metro Areas. Journal of Urban Economics 75: 2943.

D. S. Hinds and N. Ordway (1986) The Influence of Race on Rezoning Decisions: Equality of Treatment in Black and White Census Tracts, 1955–1980. The Review of Black Political Economy 14(4): 5163.

P. Ingram , J. Robinson and M. L. Busch (2005) The Intergovernmental Network of World Trade: IGO Connectedness, Governance, and Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 111(3): 824858.

J. P. LeSage and R. K. Pace (2009) Introduction to Spatial Econometrics. Vol. 196 of Statistics, Textbooks and Monographs Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

R. Lopez and H. P. Hynes (2003) Sprawl in the 1990s Measurement, Distribution, and Trends. Urban Affairs Review 38(3): 325355.

M. Lubell , R. C. Feiock and de la Cruz E. E. Ramirez (2009) Local Institutions and the Politics of Urban Growth. American Journal of Political Science 53(3): 649665.

M. Maggetti , F. Gilardi and C. M. Radaelli (2013) Designing Research in the Social Sciences. Los Angeles, CA and London: SAGE Publications Inc.

S. Mann (2009) Institutional Causes of Urban and Rural Sprawl in Switzerland. Land Use Policy 26(4): 919924.

G. Millo and G. Piras (2012) splm: Spatial Panel Data Models in R. Journal of Statistical Software 47(1): 138.

T. J. Nechyba and R. P. Walsh (2004) Urban Sprawl. Journal of Economic Perspectives 18(4): 177200.

E. Neumayer and T. Plümper (2012) Conditional Spatial Policy Dependence: Theory and Model Specification. Comparative Political Studies 45(7): 819849.

T. Plümper and E. Neumayer (2010) Model Specification in the Analysis of Spatial Dependence. European Journal of Political Research 49(3): 418442.

J. Richer (1995) Explaining the Vote for Slow Growth. Public Choice 82(3/4): 207223.

J. Rincke (2010) A Commuting-Based Refinement of the Contiguity Matrix for Spatial Models, and an Application to Local Police Expenditures. Regional Science and Urban Economics 40(5): 324330.

C. A. Schaltegger , F. Somogyi and J.-E. Sturm (2011) Tax Competition and Income Sorting: Evidence from the Zurich Metropolitan Area. European Journal of Political Economy 27(3): 455470.

K. Schmidheiny (2006) Income Segregation and Local Progressive Taxation: Empirical Evidence from Switzerland. Journal of Public Economics 90(3): 429458.

K. Schone , W. Koch and C. Baumont (2013) Modeling Local Growth Control Decisions in a Multi-City Case: Do Spatial Interactions and Lobbying Efforts Matter? Public Choice 154(1-2): 95117.

J. Schuetz (2008) Guarding the Town Walls: Mechanisms and Motives for Restricting Multifamily Housing in Massachusetts. Real Estate Economics 36(3): 555586.

Q. Shen (1996) Spatial Impacts of Locally Enacted Growth Controls: The San Francisco Bay Region in the 1980s. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 23(1): 6191.

B. A. Simmons , F. Dobbin and G. Garrett (2006) Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism. International Organization 60(4): 781810.

D. Strang and S. A. Soule (1998) Diffusion in Organizations and Social Movements: From Hybrid Corn to Poison Pills. Annual Review of Sociology 24(1): 265290.

C. M. Tiebout (1956) A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. Journal of Political Economy 64(5): 416424.

G. F. Ulfarsson and J. I. Carruthers (2006) The Cycle of Fragmentation and Sprawl: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Model. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 33(5): 767788.

C. Volden (2002) The Politics of Competitive Federalism: A Race to the Bottom in Welfare Benefits? American Journal of Political Science 46(2): 352363.

C. Volden (2006) States as Policy Laboratories: Emulating Success in the Children’s Health Insurance Program. American Journal of Political Science 50(2): 294312.

F. Wasserfallen (2014) Contextual Variation in Interdependent Policy Making: The Case of Tax Competition. European Journal of Political Research 53(4): 822839.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Public Policy
  • ISSN: 0143-814X
  • EISSN: 1469-7815
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-public-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Berli supplementary material
Berli supplementary material 1

 Word (104 KB)
104 KB

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 10
Total number of PDF views: 45 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 594 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 14th December 2016 - 25th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.