Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Contingent technocracy: bureaucratic independence in developing countries

  • Manuel P. Teodoro (a1) and M. Anne Pitcher (a2)

This study investigates the effects of formal bureaucratic independence under varying democratic conditions. Conventional accounts predict that greater formal independence of technocratic agencies facilitates policy implementation, but those claims rest on observations of industrialised, high-income countries that are also established democracies. On the basis of research in developing countries, we argue that the effects of agency independence depend on the political context in which the agency operates. Our empirical subjects are privatisation agencies and their efforts to privatise state-owned enterprises in Africa. We predict that greater independence leads to more thorough privatisation under authoritarian regimes, but that the effect of independence declines as a country becomes more democratic. Using an original data set, we examine the relationship between formal agency independence and privatisation in Africa from 1990 to 2007. Our results modify the conventional wisdom on bureaucratic independence and culminate in a more nuanced theory of “contingent technocracy”.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

E. Akwetey and J. Kraus (2007). Trade Unions, Development, and Democratization in Zambia: The Continuing Struggle. In Kraus J. (ed.), Trade Unions and the Coming of Democracy in Africa, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

E. Araral (2009) The Strategic Games that Bureaucrats Play: An Institutional Rational Choice Analysis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19(4): 853871.

E. Araral (2014) Policy and Regulatory Design for Developing Countries: A Mechanism Design and Transaction Cost Approach. Policy Sciences 47(3): 289303.

S. Borner , A. Brunetti and B. Weder (1995) Political Credibility and Economic Development. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

T. Brambor , W. R. Clark and M. Golder (2006) Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analysis. Political Analysis 14(1): 6382.

N. Charron and V. Lapuente (2011) Which Dictators Produce Quality of Government? Studies in Comparative International Development 46: 397423.

R. De Figueiredo (2002) Electoral Competition, Political Uncertainty, and Policy Insulation. American Political Science Review 96(2): 321333.

A. Dreher (2006) IMF and Economic Growth: The Effects of Programs, Loans, and Compliance With Conditionality. World Development 34(5): 769788.

N. K. Dubash and B. Morgan (2013) The Rise of the Regulatory State of the South: Infrastructure and Development in Emerging Economies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

R. Elgie (1998) Democratic Accountability and Central Bank Independence: Historical and Contemporary, National and European Perspectives. West European Politics 21(3): 5376.

F. Fukuyama (2013) What is Governance? Governance 26(3): 347368.

F. Gilardi (2005) The Formal Independence of Regulators: A Comparison of 17 Countries and 7 Sectors. Swiss Political Science Review 11(4): 139167.

C. Hanretty and C. Koop (2011) Measuring the Formal Independence of Regulatory Agencies. Journal of European Public Policy 19(2): 198216.

J. Hellman (1998) Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reform in Postcommunist Transitions. World Politics 50(January): 203–234.

K. Hochstetler (2012) Civil Society and the Regulatory State of the South: A Commentary. Regulation and Governance 6: 362370.

M. Humphreys and R. Bates (2005) Political Institutions and Economic Policies: Lessons from Africa. British Journal of Political Science 35(3): 403428.

J. Jordana and D. Levi-Faur (2005) The Diffusion of Regulatory Capitalism in Latin America: Sectoral and National Channels in the Making of a New Order. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 598: 102124.

P. Keefer and D. Stasavage (2002) Checks and Balances, Private Information, and the Credibility of Monetary Commitments. International Organization 56(4): 751774.

M. Larmer and A. Fraser (2007). Of Cabbages and King Cobra: Populist Politics and Zambia’s 2006 Election. African Affairs 106: 611637.

D. Levi-Faur (2003) The Politics of Liberalisation: Privatisation and Competition in Europe’s and Latin America’s Telecoms and Electricity Industries. European Journal of Political Research 42: 705740.

M. Maggetti (2007) De Facto Independence After Delegation: A Fuzzy-Set Analysis. Regulation and Governance 1: 271294.

M. Maggetti (2012) The Media Accountability of Independent Regulatory Agencies. European Political Science Review 4(3): 385408.

T. Mkandawire (2015) Neopatrimonialism and the Political Economy of Economic Performance in Africa: Critical Reflections. World Politics 67(3): 563612.

T. Pepinsky (2014) The Institutional Turn in Comparative Authoritarianism. British Journal of Political Science 44(3): 631653.

R. Putnam (1988) Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization 42(3): 427460.

D. Slater (2010) Ordering Power. Contentious Politics and Authoritarian Leviathans in Southeast Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

D. Stasavage (2003) Transparency, Accountability and the Economic Consequences of Monetary Institutions. American Journal of Political Science 47(3): 389402.

N. Van de Walle (2001) African Economies and the Politics of Permanent Crisis, 1979-1999. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

J. Wright (2008) Do Authoritarian Institutions Constrain? How Legislatures Affect Economic Growth and Investment. American Journal of Political Science 52(2): 322343.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Public Policy
  • ISSN: 0143-814X
  • EISSN: 1469-7815
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-public-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Type Description Title
Supplementary Materials

Teodoro and Pitcher supplementary material

 Word (97 KB)
97 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 8
Total number of PDF views: 63 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 493 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 14th December 2016 - 23rd September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.