Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Dealing with bad guys: actor- and process-level determinants of the “devil shift” in policy making

  • Manuel Fischer (a1), Karin Ingold (a2), Pascal Sciarini (a3) and Frédéric Varone (a4)

Abstract

Policy actors tend to misinterpret and distrust opponents in policy processes. This phenomenon, known as the “devil shift”, consists of the following two dimensions: actors perceive opponents as more powerful and as more evil than they really are. Analysing nine policy processes in Switzerland, this article highlights the drivers of the devil shift at two levels. On the actor level, interest groups, political parties and powerful actors suffer more from the devil shift than state actors and powerless actors. On the process level, the devil shift is stronger in policy processes dealing with socio-economic issues as compared with other issues. Finally, and in line with previous studies, there is less empirical evidence of the power dimension of the devil shift phenomenon than of its evilness dimension.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Ahler, D. J. (2014) Self-Fulfilling Misperceptions of Public Polarization. The Journal of Politics 76(3): 607620.
Ansell, C. and Gash, A. (2008) Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18(4): 543571.
Batagelj, V. and Mrvar, A. (1996) PAJEK – Program for Large Network Analysis.
Baumgartner, F. R. and Jones, B. D. (1991) Agenda Dynamics and Policy Subsystems. The Journal of Politics 53(4): 10441074.
Baumgartner, F. R. and Jones, B. D. (1993) Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Berardo, R. (2009) Generalized Trust in Multi-Organizational Policy Arenas: Studying its Emergence from a Network Perspective. Political Research Quarterly 62(1): 178189.
Berardo, R. (2013) The Coevolution of Perceptions of Procedural Fairness and Link Formation in Self-Organizing Policy Networks. The Journal of Politics 75(3): 686700.
Besley, T. and Case, A. (1995) Does Electoral Accountability Affect Economic Policy Choices? Evidence from Gubernatorial Term Limits. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 110(3): 769798.
Beyers, J. and Braun, C. (2014) Ties that Count. Explaining Interest Group Access to Policymakers. Journal of Public Policy 34(1): 93121.
Bliese, P. D. (2012) Multilevel Modeling in R (2.4). A Brief Introduction to R, the Multilevel Package and the NLME Package. Working paper (http://cran.r-project.org/doc/contrib/Bliese_Multilevel.pdf).
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G. and Freeman, L. C. (2002) Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
Culpepper, P. D. (2011) Business Power and Democratic Politics. In Culpepper P. D. (ed.), Quiet Politics and Business Power. Cambridge and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 177198.
de Nooy, W., Mrvar, A. and Batagelj, V. (2005) Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Doreian, P. and Mrvar, A. (2009) Partitioning Signed Social Networks. Social Networks 31: 111.
Fischer, M. (2014) Institutions and Coalitions in Policy Processes: A Cross-Sectoral Comparison. Journal of Public Policy, first published online 16 June 2014, doi:10.1017/S0143814X14000166.
Fischer, M., Fischer, A. and Sciarini, P. (2009) Power and Conflict in the Swiss Political Elite: An Aggregation of Existing Network Analyses. Swiss Political Science Review 15(1): 3162.
Gelman, A. and Hill, J. (2006) Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heaney, M. (2014) Multiplex Networks and Interest Group Influence Reputation: An Exponential Random Graph Model. Social Networks 36: 6681.
Henry, A. D. (2011) Ideology, Power, and the Structure of Policy Networks. Policy Studies Journal 39(3): 361383.
Hojnacki, M. (1998) Organized Interests’ Advocacy Behavior in Alliances. Political Research Quarterly 51(2): 437459.
Howlett, M., Ramesh, M. and Perl, A. (2009) Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford and New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Ingold, K. (2011) Network Structures Within Policy Processes: Coalitions, Power, and Brokerage in Swiss Climate Policy. Policy Studies Journal 39(3): 435459.
Ingold, K. and Fischer, M. (2014) Drivers of Collaboration to Mitigate Climate Change: An Illustration of Swiss Climate Policy Over 15 Years. Global Environmental Change 24: 8898.
Ingold, K. and Varone, F. (2012) Treating Policy Brokers Seriously: Evidence from the Climate Policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22: 319346.
Jenkins-Smith, H. C. and Sabatier, P. A. (1994) Evaluating the Advocacy Coalition Framework. Journal of Public Policy 14(2): 175203.
Kahnemann, D. and Tversky, A. (1984) Choices, Values, and Frames. American Psychologist 39(4): 341350.
Katzenstein, P. (1985) Small States in World Markets. Cornell: Cornell University Press.
Kingdon, J. (2003) Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies, 2nd ed. New York and London: Longman.
Knill, C. and Tosun, J. (2012) Public Policy: A New Introduction. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Knoke, D. (1993) Networks of Elite Structure and Decision Making. Sociological Methods & Research 22(1): 2245.
Knoke, D., Pappi, F. U., Broadbent, J. and Tsujinaka, Y. (1996) Comparing Policy Networks – Labor Politics in the U.S., Germany, and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kriesi, H. (1980) Entscheidungsstrukturen und Entscheidungsprozesse in der Schweizer Politik. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
Kriesi, H., Adam, S. and Jochum, M. (2006a) Comparative Analysis of Policy Networks in Western Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 13(3): 341361.
Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S. and Frey, T. (2006b) Globalization and the Transformation of the National Political Space: Six European Countries Compared. European Journal of Political Research 45: 921956.
Leach, W. D. and Sabatier, P. A. (2005) To Trust an Adversary: Integrating Rational and Psychological Models of Collaborative Policymaking. American Political Science Review 99(4): 491503.
Leifeld, P. and Schneider, V. (2012) Information Exchange in Policy Networks. American Journal of Political Science 53(3): 731744.
Lijphart, A. (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Lowi, T. J. (1964) American Business, Public Policy, Case Studies, and Political Theory. World Politics 16(4): 677715.
Lubell, M. (2007) Familiarity Breeds Trust: Collective Action in a Policy Domain. Journal of Politics 69: 237250.
Maas, C. J. M. and Hox, J. J. (2004) The Influence of Violations of Assumptions on Multilevel Parameter Estimates and Their Standard Errors. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 46: 427440.
Maas, C. J. M. and Hox, J. J. (2005) Sufficient Sample Sizes for Multilevel Modeling. Methodology 1(3): 8692.
Mintrom, M. and Vergari, S. (1996) Advocacy Coalitions, Policy Entrepreneurs, and Policy Change. Policy Studies Journal 24(3): 420434.
Moe, T. (1980) The Organization of Interests. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Nohrstedt, D. and Ingold, K. (2011) Venue Access and Policy Conflict: Belief System Alignement in Swiss and Swedish Energy Policy Subsystems. Paper presented at MPSA Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, March 31 – April 3, 2011.
Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Actors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, E. (2005) Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Pralle, S. B. (2006) Branching Out, Digging In: Environmental Advocacy and Agenda Setting. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Putnam, R. (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Sabatier, P. A. (1987) Knowledge, Policy-Oriented Learning, and Policy Change: An Advocacy Coalition Framework. Science Communication 8: 649692.
Sabatier, P. A. (1998) The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Revisions and Relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 5(1): 98130.
Sabatier, P. A. (2007) Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Sabatier, P. A., Hunter, S. and McLaughlin, S. (1987) The Devil Shift: Perceptions and Misperceptions of Opponents. Political Research Quarterly 40: 449476.
Sabatier, P. A. and Jenkins-Smith, H. (eds.) (1993) Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Sabatier, P. A. and Weible, C. M. (2007) The Advocacy Coalition Framework. In Sabatier P. A. (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 189222.
Scharpf, F. W. (1997) Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder, CO and Oxford: Westview Press.
Schattschneider, E. E. (1960) The Semi-Sovereign People. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Schlager, E. C. (1995) Policy Making and Collective Action: Defining Coalitions Within the Advocacy Coalition Framework. Policy Sciences 28: 243270.
Schmitter, P. C. and Streeck, W. (1999) The Organization of Business Interests. MPIfG Discussion Paper 99(1).
Sciarini, P. (2014) Eppure si Muove: The Changing Nature of the Swiss Consensus Democracy. Journal of European Public Policy 21(1): 116132.
Steenbergen, M. R. and Jones, B. S. (2002) Modeling Multilevel Data Structures. American Journal of Political Science 46(1): 218237.
Stokman, F. N. and Zeggelink, E. P. H. (1996) Is Politics Power or Policy Oriented? A Comparative Analysis of Dynamic Access Models in Policy Networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 21(1–2): 77111.
Strolovitch, D. Z. (2006) Do Interest Groups Represent the Disadvantaged? Advocacy at the Intersections of Race, Class, and Gender. The Journal of Politics 68(4): 894910.
Tsebelis, G. (2002) Veto Players – How Political Institutions Work. New York, NY and Princeton, NJ: Russell Sage Foundation and Princeton University Press.
Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. (1994) Social Network Analysis. Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weible, C. M. and Sabatier, P. A. (2005) Comparing Policy Networks: Marine Protected Areas in California. The Policy Studies Journal 33(2): 181201.
Weible, C. M., Sabatier, P. A. and McQueen, K. (2009) Themes and Variations: Taking Stock of the Advocacy Coalition Framework. The Policy Studies Journal 37(1): 121140.
Weible, C. M., Sabatier, P. A., Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Nohrstedt, D., Henry, A. D. and DeLeon, P. (2011a) A Quarter Century of the Advocacy Coalition Framework: Introduction to the Special Issue. The Policy Studies Journal 39: 349360.
Weible, C. M., Siddiki, S. N. and Pierce, J. J. (2011b) Foes to Friends: Changing Contexts and Changing Intergroup Perceptions. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 13(5): 499525.
Weiss, U. (1996) Macht. In Nohlen D. and Schultze R. O. (eds.), Lexikon der Politik – Politische Theorien. Frankfurt am Main: Büchergilde Gutenberg, 305315.

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed