Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

A defence of participation income

  • Cristian Pérez-Muñoz (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

This article offers a novel defence of participation income (PI). It claims that there are pragmatic and normative reasons to prefer PI over alternative redistributive policies, such as an unconditional basic income and workfare programmes. In particular, it argues that PI should be conceived as a particular type of civic service programme designed to address a large number of unmet social needs that are not met by entrepreneurs in the marketplace. The article ends by addressing five objections that can be raised against its argument.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

A. B. Atkinson (1995b) Public Economics in Action: The Basic Income/flat Tax Proposal. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

A. B. Atkinson (1996) The Case for a Participation Income. The Political Quarterly 67(1): 6770.

B. Barry (1996) Real Freedom and Basic Income. Journal of Political Philosophy 4(3): 242276.

H. Boyte (2011) Public Work and the Politics of the Commons. The Good Society 20(1): 84101.

S. Birnbaum (2012) Basic Income Reconsidered: Social Justice, Liberalism, and the Demands of Equality. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

A. Zelleke (2005) Basic Income in the United States: Redefining Citizenship in the Liberal State. Review of Social Economy 63(4): 633648.

U. Colombino , M. Locatelli , E. Narazani and C. O’Donoghue (2010) Alternative Basic Income Mechanisms: An Evaluation Exercise with a Microeconometric Model. Basic Income Studies 5(1): 131.

R. Dagger (2005) A Duty to Serve? Responsibility, Reciprocity and the Paradox of Civic Service. Public Policy Research 12(1): 1521.

J. De Wispelaere and L. Stirton (2007) The Public Administration Case against Participation Income. Social Service Review 81(3): 523549.

C. Diver (1983) The Optimal Precision of Administrative Rules. Yale Law Journal 93(1): 65109.

J. Elster (1986) Comment on van Der Veen and Van Parijs. Theory and Society 15(5): 709721.

W. M. Evers (1990) National Service: Pro & Con. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.

C. Fabre (2006) Whose Body Is It Anyway?: Justice and the Integrity of the Person. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

R. Goodin (2003) Sneaking up on Stakeholding. In Dowding K., De Wispelaere J. and White S. (eds.), The Ethics of Stakeholding. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan, 6578.

S. Hansson and G. Helgesson (2003) What Is Stability? Synthese 136(2): 219235.

S. F. Midtgaard (2008) Rawlsian Stability and Basic Income. Basic Income Studies 3(2): 117.

C. Pateman (2004) Democratizing Citizenship: Some Advantages of a Basic Income. Politics & Society 32(1): 89105.

J. Rios and D. Rios Insua (2007) A Framework for Participatory Budget Elaboration Support. Journal of the Operational Research Society 59(2): 203212.

A. Fiszbein , N. R. Schady and F. H. G. Ferreira (2009) Conditional Cash Transfers: Reducing Present and Future Poverty. Washington DC: World Bank Publications.

H. Schmidt , K. Voigt and D. Wikler (2010) Carrots, Sticks, and Health Care Reform Problems with Wellness Incentives. New England Journal of Medicine 362(2): e3(1)e3(3).

C. Souza (2001) Participatory Budgeting in Brazilian Cities: Limits and Possibilities in Building Democratic Institutions. Environment and Urbanization 13(1): 159184.

Y. Vanderborght and P. Van Parijs (2001) Assurance Participation et Revenu de Participation. Reflets et perspectives de la vie economique XL(1–2): 183196.

P. Van Parijs (2004) Basic Income: A Simple and Powerful Idea for the Twenty-First Century. Politics & Society 32(1): 739.

S. White (2003a) Fair Reciprocity and Basic Income. In Reeves A. and Williams A. (eds.), Real Libertarianism Assessed. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 136160.

S. White (2003b) The Civic Minimum: On the Rights and Obligations of Economic Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

S. White (2004) The Citizen’s Stake and Paternalism. Politics & Society 32(1): 6178.

K. Widerquist (2013) Independence, Propertylessness, and Basic Income: A Theory of Freedom as the Power to Say No. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Public Policy
  • ISSN: 0143-814X
  • EISSN: 1469-7815
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-public-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 15
Total number of PDF views: 176 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 422 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th April 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.