Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Fiscal federalism and American exceptionalism: why is there no federal equalisation system in the United States?

  • Daniel Béland (a1) and André Lecours (a2)
Abstract
Abstract

This article addresses the absence of a federal equalisation programme in the United States, which is a significant aspect of “American exceptionalism”. Comparing the United States with Australia and Canada, we argue that three factors are relevant when accounting for this absence. On one hand, we turn to two societal factors to explain why there was never much political appetite for the creation of a stand-alone equalisation programme in the United States, namely the lack of a direct threat to the territorial integrity of the United States after 1865 and the comparative weakness of the idea of social citizenship in that country. On the other hand, our analysis shows that key institutional features of American political institutions, particularly strong bicameralism combined with the absence of formal party discipline, help illuminate why it would have been difficult to create an equalisation programme even if there had been some societal pressures to do so.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

L. Anderson (2004) The Institutional Basis of Secessionist Politics: Federalism and Secession in the United States. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 34(2): 118.

D. Béland and J. S. Hacker (2004) Ideas, Private Institutions, and American Welfare State “Exceptionalism”: The Case of Health and Old-Age Insurance, 1915–1965. International Journal of Social Welfare 13(1): 4254.

D. Béland and A. Lecours (2008) Nationalism and Social Policy: The Politics of Territorial Solidarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

A. M. Bertelli and C. R. Grose (2009) Secretaries of Pork? A New Theory of Distributive Public Policy. Journal of Politics 71(3): 926945.

R. M. Bird and A. Tarasov (2004) Closing the Gap: Fiscal Imbalances and Intergovernmental Transfers in Developed Federations. Environment and Planning C 22(1): 77102.

J. Brodie (2002) Citizenship and Solidarity: Reflections on the Canadian Way. Citizenship Studies 6: 377394.

R. Else-Mitchell (1979) Fiscal Equality Between the States: The New Role of the Common wealth Grants Commission. Australian Journal of Public Administration 38(2): 157167.

J. Erk (2007) Explaining Federalism: State, Society and Congruence in Austria, Belgium, Canada, Germany, and Switzerland. London: Routledge.

D. Evans (2004) Greasing the Wheels: Using Pork Barrel Projects to Build Majority Coalitions in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.

A. Fenna (2007) The Malaise of Federalism: Comparative Reflections on Commonwealth-State Relations. The Australian Journal of Public Administration 66: 298306.

B. Galligan (1995) A Federal Republic: Australia’s Constitutional System of Government. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

P. A. Hall and R. C. R. Taylor (1996) Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies 44(5): 936957.

J. Lazarus , J. Glas and K. T. Barbieri (2012) Earmarks and Elections in the U.S. House of Representatives. Congress and the Presidency 39(3): 254269.

A. Lecours and D. Béland (2010) Federalism and Fiscal Policy: The Politics of Equalization in Canada. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 40(4): 569596.

T. J. Lowi (1984) Why is There no Socialism in the United States? A Federal Analysis. International Political Science Review 5(4): 369380.

S. Macintyre (2009) A Concise History of Australia, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

G. P. Marchildon (2005) Understanding Equalization: Is it Possible? Canadian Public Administration 48(3): 420428.

I. W. Martin , A. K. Mehrotra and M. Prasad (2009) The New Fiscal Sociology: Taxation in Comparative and Historical Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.

A. Morris (2002) The Commonwealth Grants Commission and Horizontal Fiscal Equalization. The Australian Economic Review 35(3): 318324.

H. Obinger , S. Leibfried and F. G. Castles (eds.) (2005) Federalism and the Welfare State: New World and European Experiences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

K. Orren and S. Skowronek (2004) The Search for American Political Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

T. Padamsee (2009) Culture in Connection: Re-Contextualizing Ideational Processes in the Analysis of Policy Development. Social Politics 16(4): 413445.

P. Pierson (2004) Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

M. S. Rocca and S. B. Gordon (2013) Earmarks as a Means and an End: The Link Between Earmarks and Campaign Contributions in the U.S. House of Representatives. Journal of Politics 75(1): 241253.

S. Shaver (2002) Australian Welfare Reform: From Citizenship to Supervision. Social Policy & Administration 36(4): 331345.

J. Smith (2009) The Democratic Dilemma: Reforming the Canadian Senate. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

W. Sombart (1976 [1906]) Why is There no Socialism in the United States? New York: M.E. Sharpe.

J. Soss , R. C. Fording and S. F. Schram (2011) Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

S. Steinmo , K. Thelen and F. Longstreth (1992) Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.

B. Théret (1999) Regionalism and Federalism: A Comparative Analysis of the Regulation of Economic Tensions Between Regions by Canadian and American Federal Intergovernmental Transfer Programmes. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 23(3): 479512.

R. L. Watts (1999) Equalization in Commonwealth Federations. Regional and Federal Studies 13: 111129.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Public Policy
  • ISSN: 0143-814X
  • EISSN: 1469-7815
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-public-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 45 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 160 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 28th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.