Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Frontline uses of European Union (EU) law: a parallel legal order? How structural discretion conditions uses of EU law in Dutch and German migration offices

  • Nora Dörrenbächer (a1)

This article tackles the question of how bureaucratic structures condition frontline implementers’ use of European Union (EU) migration law. Adopting an organisational perspective, the study expects that only under discretion do implementers draw independently on original EU law. Empirically, the article draws on qualitative interviews with migration law implementers in the Netherlands and the German Bundesland of North Rhine-Westphalia. The analysis reveals that in the nondiscretionary Dutch structure, frontline implementers only rely on EU law when receiving instructions from higher administrative levels. The use of EU law is more diverse in the German discretionary structure. Under legal tension, several German frontline implementers use EU law parallel to national law. However, not all German respondents feel comfortable in interpreting original EU law and jurisprudence. Although structural discretion conditions uses of EU law, the variation of the German case suggests that microlevel factors complement explanations for frontline uses of EU law.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

T. Bach and W. Jann (2010) Animals in the Administrative Zoo: Organizational Change and Agency Autonomy in Germany. International Review of Administrative Sciences 76(3): 443468.

J. Beyers and J. Trondal (2004) How Nation States “Hit” Europe: Ambiguity and Representation in the European Union. West European Politics 27(5): 919942.

M. Bovens and S. Zouridis (2002) From Street-Level to System-Level Bureaucracies: How Information and Communication Technology is Transforming Administrative Discretion and Constitutional Control. Public Administration Review 62(2): 174184.

T. Christensen (1991) Bureaucratic Roles: Political Loyalty and Professional Autonomy. Scandinavian Political Studies 14: 303320.

T. Christensen and P. Laegreid (2009) Organising Immigration Policy: The Unstable Balance Between Political Control and Agency Autonomy. Policy & Politics 37(2): 161177.

L. Conant (2012) Compliance and What EU Member States Make Out of it. In Cremona M. (ed.), Compliance and the Enforcement of EU Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 130.

R. Dehousse (2008) Delegation of powers in the European Union: the need for a multi-principals model. West European Politics 31(4): 789805.

A. Dimitrova and B. Steunenberg (2013) Living in Parallel Universes? Implementing European Movable Cultural Heritage Policy in Bulgaria. Journal of Common Market Studies 51(2): 246263.

N. Dörrenbächer , E. Mastenbroek and D. D. Toshkov (2015) National Parliaments and Transposition of EU Law: A Matter of Coalition Conflict? Journal of Common Market Studies 53(5): 10101026.

M. Egeberg (2008) European Government(s): Executive Politics in Transition? West European Politics 31(1–2): 235257.

M. Egeberg and J. Trondal (2009) National Agencies in the European Administrative Space: Government Driven, Commission Driven or Networked? Public Administration 87(4): 779790.

D. Epstein and S. O’Halloran (1994) Administrative Procedures, Information, and Agency Discretion. American Journal of Political Science 38(3): 697722.

G. Falkner , M. Hartlapp and O. Treib (2007) Worlds of Compliance: Why Leading Approaches to European Union Implementation are Only “Sometimes-True Theories”. European Journal of Political Research 46(3): 395416.

P. Hille and C. Knill (2006) It’s the Bureaucracy, Stupid: The Implementation of the Acquis Communautaire in EU Candidate Countries, 1999-2003. European Union Politics 7(4): 531552.

J. D. Huber and C. R. Shipan (2002) Deliberate Discretion?: The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

J. Huber , C. Shipan and M. Pfahler (2001) Legislatures and Statutory Control of Bureaucracy. American Journal of Political Science 45(2): 330345.

P. Hupe and A. Buffat (2014) A Public Service Gap: Capturing Contexts in a Comparative Approach of Street-Level Bureaucracy. Public Management Review 16(4): 548569.

M. Kaeding (2006) Determinants of Transposition Delay in the European Union. Journal of Public Policy 26(2): 229253.

C. Knill and A. Lenschow (1998) Coping With Europe: The Impact of British and German Administrations on the Implementation of EU Environmental Policy. Journal of European Public Policy 5(4): 595614.

C. Knill and A. Lenschow (2005) Compliance, Competition and Communication: Different Approaches of European Governance and Their Impact on National Institutions. Journal of Common Market Studies 43(3): 583606.

E. Kofman (2004) Family Related Migration: A Critical Review of European Studies. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 30(2): 243262.

J. G. March and J. P. Olsen (1998) The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders. International Organization 52(4): 943969.

E. Mastenbroek (2005) EU Compliance: Still a “Black Hole”? Journal of European Public Policy 12(6): 11031120.

P. J. May and S. C. Winter (2009) Politicians, Managers, and Street-Level Bureaucrats: Influences on Policy Implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19(3): 453476.

M. McCubbins and T. Schwartz (2009) Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols Versus Fire Alarms. American Journal of Political Science 28(1): 165179.

M. K. Meyers and S. Vorsanger (2003) Street-Level Bureaucrats and the Implementation of Public Policy. In Peters B. G. and Pierre J. (eds.), Handbook of Public Administration. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 245255.

M. Painter and G. Peters (2010) Administrative Traditions in Comparative Perspective: Families, Groups and Hybrids. In Painter M. and Peters B. G. (eds.), Tradition and Public Administration. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1930.

B. Steunenberg and D. Toshkov (2009) Comparing Transposition in the 27 Member States of the EU: The Impact of Discretion and Legal Fit. Journal of European Public Policy 16(7): 951970.

O. Treib (2014) Implementing and Complying with EU Governance Outputs. Living Reviews in European Governance 9(1): 147.

J. Trondal (2011) An Emergent European Executive Order. Journal of European Integration 33(1): 5574.

L. L. G. Tummers , V. Bekkers , E. Vink and M. Musheno (2015) Coping During Public Service Delivery: A Conceptualization and Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25(4): 10991126.

E. Versluis (2007) Even Rules, Uneven Practices: Opening the “Black Box” of EU Law in Action. West European Politics 30(1): 5067.

A. B. Whitford (2002) Decentralization and Political Control of the Bureaucracy. Journal of Theoretical Politics 14(2): 167193.

A. B. Whitford (2008) The Pursuit of Political Control by Multiple Principals. The Journal of Politics 67(1): 2949.

H. Wockelberg (2014) Political Servants or Independent Experts? A Comparative Study of Bureaucratic Role Perceptions and the Implementation of EU Law in Denmark and Sweden. Journal of European Integration 36(7): 731747.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Public Policy
  • ISSN: 0143-814X
  • EISSN: 1469-7815
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-public-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Type Description Title
Supplementary Materials

Dörrenbächer supplementary material
Dörrenbächer supplementary material

 Word (22 KB)
22 KB


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 21 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 158 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 13th July 2017 - 23rd September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.