Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Going beyond dyadic consultation relationships: information exchange in multi-step participation procedures

  • Simon Fink (a1) and Eva Ruffing (a2)
Abstract

For decades, political scientists have observed the diffusion of complex governance arrangements including public participation procedures to ameliorate the democratic deficit inherent in these often-opaque structures. This article asks how the information provided in consultation statements is used by the consulting actors. To account for the multi-step character, the article combines exchange theory with a principal-agent approach, acknowledging that several actors in a delegation chain might be interested in the provided information. We use a typical case of a multi-step procedure – participation in German grid development – to test both theories. Neither the private firms nor the regulator use information provided in their own consultations, contradicting exchange theory. But the regulator considers ecological submissions made in the firms’ consultation, as the principal-agent approach suggests. Thus, a principal-agent approach allows us to find influence of consultation statements that exchange theory cannot detect.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Going beyond dyadic consultation relationships: information exchange in multi-step participation procedures
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Going beyond dyadic consultation relationships: information exchange in multi-step participation procedures
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Going beyond dyadic consultation relationships: information exchange in multi-step participation procedures
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author. Email: simon.fink@sowi.uni-goettingen.de
References
Hide All
Balla, SJ (1998) Administrative Procedures and Political Control of the Bureaucracy. The American Political Science Review 92(3): 663673.
Boehmke, FJ, Gailmard, S Patty, JW (2013) Business as Usual: Interest Group Access and Representation Across Policy-Making Venues. Journal of Public Policy 33(1): 333.
Bouwen, P (2004) Exchanging Access Goods for Access: A Comparative Study of Business Lobbying in the European Union Institutions. European Journal of Political Research 43(3): 337369.
Broscheid, A Coen, D (2007) Lobbying Activity and Fora Creation in the EU: Empirically Exploring the Nature of the Policy Good. Journal of European Public Policy 14(3): 346365.
Bunea, A Thomson, R (2015) Consultations with Interest Groups and the Empowerment of Executives: Evidence from the European Union. Governance 28(4): 517531.
Busuioc, M, Groenleer, M Trondal, J (2012) The Agency Phenomenon in the European Union. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Devine-Wright, P (2014) Renewable Energy and the Public: From NIMBY to Participation. London: Earthscan.
Eberlein, B (2008) The Making of the European Energy Market: The Interplay of Governance and Government. Journal of Public Policy 28(1): 7392.
Eversole, R (2011) Community Agency and Community Engagement: Re-Theorising Participation in Governance. Journal of Public Policy 31(1): 5171.
Federal Network Agency (FNA) (2012) Bestätigung Netzentwicklungsplan Strom 2012 durch die Bundesnetzagentur für Elektrizität, Gas, Telekommunikation, Post und Eisenbahnen. Bonn: Bundesnetzagentur.
Federal Network Agency (FNA) (2013) Bestätigung Netzentwicklungsplan Strom 2013 durch die Bundesnetzagentur für Elektrizität, Gas, Telekommunikation, Post und Eisenbahnen. Bonn: Bundesnetzagentur.
Fink, S Ruffing, E (2017) The Differentiated Implementation of European Participation Rules in Energy Infrastructure Planning. Why Does the German Participation Regime Exceed European Requirements? European Policy Analysis 3(2): 274294.
Focht, P (2011) Noch Erfahrungsbedarf bei Erdkabeln. In Energie & Management, 15 February 2011.
Gehring, T Kerler, M (2008) Institutional Stimulation of Deliberative Decision-Making: Division of Labour, Deliberative Legitimacy and Technical Regulation in the European Single Market. Journal of Common Market Studies 46(5): 10011024.
Klüver, H (2013) Lobbying as a Collective Enterprise: Winners and Losers of Policy Formulation in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 20(1): 5976.
Lupia, A McCubbins, M (1994) Learning from Oversight: Fire Alarms and Police Patrols Reconstructed. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 10(1): 96125.
Mattli, W Büthe, T (2005) Accountability in Accounting? The Politics of Private Rule-Making in the Public Interest. Governance 18(3): 399429.
Mayntz, R (2016) Steering. In Ansell, CK and Torfing, J (eds.), Handbook on Theories of Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 259266.
McCubbins, M Schwartz, T (1984) Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols Versus Fire Alarms. American Journal of Political Science 28(1): 165179.
Mörth, U (2009) The Market Turn in EU Governance-The Emergence of Public-Private Collaboration. Governance 22(1): 99120.
Morton, R Cameron, C (2006) Elections and the Theory of Campaign Contributions: A Survey and Critical Analysis. Economics & Politics 4(1): 79108.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (2001) Citizens as Partners. Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy-Making. Paris: OECD.
Rasmussen, A (2015) Participation in Written Government Consultations in Denmark and the UK: System and Actor-Level Effects. Government and Opposition 50(2): 271299.
Rohlfing, I (2012) Case Studies and Causal Inference. An Integrative Framework. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ruffing, E (2014) How to Become an Independent Agency: The Creation of the German Federal Network Agency. German Politics 23(1–2): 4358.
Steinbach, A (2013a) Barriers and Solutions for Expansion of Electricity Grids—The German Experience. Energy Policy 63, 224229.
Steinbach, A (ed.) (2013b) NABEG, EnLAG, EnWG. Kommentar zum Recht des Energieleitungsbaus. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Stoutenborough, JW, Bromley-Trujillo, R Vedlitz, A (2015) How to Win Friends and Influence People: Climate Scientists’ Perspectives on their Relationship with and Influence on Government Officials. Journal of Public Policy 35(2): 269296.
Transmission System Operators (TSOs) (2012a) Netzentwicklungsplan Strom 2012. Entwurf der Übertragungsnetzbetreiber.
Transmission System Operators (TSOs) (2012b) Netzentwicklungsplan Strom 2012. Zweiter überarbeiteter Entwurf der Übertragungsnetzbetreiber.
Yackee, SW (2006) Sweet-Talking the Fourth Branch: The Influence of Interest Group Comments on Federal Agency Rulemaking. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16(1): 103124.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Public Policy
  • ISSN: 0143-814X
  • EISSN: 1469-7815
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-public-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Fink and Ruffing supplementary material
Appendix

 Word (30 KB)
30 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 29 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 98 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 6th August 2018 - 15th August 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.