Skip to main content
×
Home

The impact of intra-EU migration on welfare chauvinism

  • Cornelius Cappelen (a1) and Yvette Peters (a2)
Abstract
Abstract

We examine whether intra-EU migration affects welfare chauvinistic attitudes, i.e. the idea that immigrants’ access to the welfare system should be restricted. According to the in-group/out-group theory, migration can unleash feelings of insecurity and thus trigger welfare chauvinism. According to intergroup contact theory, welfare chauvinism should decrease when immigration is higher, because contact reduces prejudice and softens anti-immigrant stances. We test these theories using data from the European Social Survey 2008/2009, supplemented with country-level data, and analyse these data using a multilevel ordered logit approach. We find a negative relation between intra-EU immigration and welfare chauvinism, supporting the intergroup contact theory: in countries with more intra-EU migration, welfare chauvinism tends to be lower. Furthermore, the higher the percentage of East European immigrants compared to other EU immigrants, the higher the level of welfare chauvinism.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Alfano M., Dustmann C. and Frattini T. (2016) Immigration and the UK: Reflections After Brexit. In Fasani F. (ed.) Refugees and Economic Migrants: Facts, Policies and Challenges. London: CEPR Press, 55–81.
Alesina A. and Glaeser E. L. (2004) Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe: A World of Difference. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 129.
Allport G. W. (1954) The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
Andersen J. G. and Bjørklund T. (1990) Structural Changes and New Cleavages: The Progress Parties in Denmark and Norway. Acta Sociologica 33(3): 195217.
Aronson E. and Patnoe S. (1997) The Jigsaw Classroom, 2nd ed. New York: Longman, 150 pp.
Banting K. G. (2010) Is There a Progressive’s Dilemma in Canada? Immigration, Multiculturalism and the Welfare State. Canadian Journal of Political Science 43(4): 797820.
Banting K., Soroka S. and Koning E. (2013) Multicultural Diversity and Redistribution. In Banting K. and Myles J. (eds), Inequality and the Fading of Redistributive Politics 165–186. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Brambor T., Clark W. R. and Golder M. (2006) Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses. Political Analysis 14: 6382.
Bonoli G. (1997) Classifying Welfare States: A Two-Dimension Approach. Journal of Social Policy 26(3): 351372.
Cappelen C. (2016) Intra-EU Migration and the Moral Sustainability of the Welfare State. In Peters Y. and Tatham M. (eds.), Democratic Transformations in Europe 31 – Challenges and Opportunities. Abingdon: Routledge, 4363.
Cappelen C. and Midtbø T. (2016) Intra-EU Labour Migration and Support for the Norwegian Welfare State. European Sociological Review 32(6): 691703.
Cappelen C. and Peters Y. ( Forthcoming) Diversity and Welfare State Legitimacy in Europe. The Challenge of Intra-EU Migration. Journal of European Public Policy (https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1314534).
CESifo (2008) Bismarck Versus Beveridge: Social Insurance Systems in Europe. Munich: IFO Institute for Economic Research.
Coenders M. and Scheepers P. (2003) The Effect of Education on Nationalism and Ethnic Exclusionism: An International Comparison. Political Psychology 24(2): 313343.
Crepaz M. M. and Damron R. (2008) Constructing Tolerance: How the Welfare State Shapes Attitudes About Immigrants. Comparative Political Studies 42: 437–463.
Dustmann C. and Frattini T. (2014) The Fiscal Effects of Immigration to the UK. The Economic Journal 124(580): F593F643.
Eger M. A. (2009) Even in Sweden: The Effect of Immigration on Support for Welfare State Spending. European Sociological Review 26: 203217.
Esping-Andersen G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Finseraas H. (2008) Immigration and Preferences for Redistribution: An Empirical Analysis of European Survey Data. Comparative European Politics 6(4): 407431.
Ford R. (2006) Prejudice and White Majority Welfare Attitudes in the UK. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 16(2): 141156.
Freeman G. P. (1986) Migration and the Political Economy of the Welfare State. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 485: 5163.
Freeman G. P. (2009) Immigration, Diversity, and Welfare Chauvinism. The Forum 7(3): 7.
Gijsberts M., Scheepers P. and Coenders M. (2004) Exclusion of Legal Migrants in Western Europe. In Gijsberts M. , Hagendoorn L. and Scheepers P. (eds.), Nationalism and Exclusion of Migrants: Cross-National Comparisons. Aldershot: Ashgate, 121142.
Gilens M. (1995) Racial Attitudes and Opposition to Welfare. The Journal of Politics 57(4): 9941014.
Gorodzeisky A. and Semyonov M. (2009) Terms of Exclusion: Public Views Towards Admission and Allocation of Rights to Immigrants in European Countries. Ethnic and Racial Studies 32(3): 401423.
Hainmueller J. and Hopkins D. J. (2014) Public Attitudes Toward Immigration. Annual Review of Political Science 17: 225249.
Hewstone M., Rubin M. and Willis H. (2002) Intergroup Bias. In Crisp R. J. (ed.), Social Psychology. vol. 3 New York, NY: Routledge, 323344.
Hopkins D. J. (2010) Politicized Places: Explaining Where and When Immigrants Provoke Local Opposition. American Political Science Review 104(1): 4060.
Johns M. (2014) The New Minorities of Europe: Social Cohesion in the European Union. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Johnston R., Banting K., Kymlicka W. and Soroka S. (2010) National Identity and Support for the Welfare State. Canadian Journal of Political Science 43(2): 349377.
Koning E. (2011) The Real and Perceived Economics of Immigration: Welfare Chauvinism and Immigrants’ Use of Government Transfers in Twelve Countries. Canadian Political Science Association Conference, 16–18 May, Waterloo.
Kunovich R. M. (2004) Social Structural Position and Prejudice: An Exploration of Cross-National Differences in Regression Slopes. Social Science Research 33(1): 2044.
Kvist J. (2004) Does EU Enlargement Start a Race to the Bottom? Strategic Interaction Among EU Member States in Social Policy. Journal of European Social Policy 14(3): 301318.
Larsen C. A. (2011) Ethnic Heterogeneity and Public Support for Welfare: Is the American Experience Replicated in Britain, Sweden and Denmark? Scandinavian Political Studies 34(4): 332353.
Luttmer E. F. (2001) Group Loyalty and the Taste for Redistribution. Journal of political Economy 109(3): 500528.
Marshall T. H. (1950) Citizenship and Social Class: And Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mau S. and Burkhardt C. (2009) Migration and Welfare State Solidarity in Western Europe. Journal of European Social Policy 19(3): 213229.
Mewes J. and Mau S. (2012) Welfare Chauvinism, Class, and Economic Uncertainty. In Svallfors S. (ed.), Contested Welfare States. Welfare Attitudes in Europe and Beyond. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, Pp. 119–157.
Mewes J. and Mau S. (2013) Globalization, Socio-Economic Status and Welfare Chauvinism: European Perspectives on Attitudes Toward the Exclusion of Immigrants. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 54(3): 228245.
Pettigrew T. F. (1998) Intergroup Contact Theory. Annual Review of Psychology 49(1): 6585.
Reeskens T. and Van Oorschot W. (2012) Disentangling the “New Liberal Dilemma”: On the Relation Between General Welfare Redistribution Preferences and Welfare Chauvinism. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 53(2): 120139.
Riordan C. (1978) Equal-Status Interracial Contact: A Review and Revision of the Concept. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 2(2): 161185.
Scheepers P., Gijsberts M. and Coenders M. (2002) Ethnic Exclusionism in European Countries: Public Opposition to Civil Rights for Legal Migrants as a Response to Perceived Ethnic Threat. European Sociological Review 18(1): 1734.
Schlueter E. and Wagner U. (2008) Regional Differences Matter Examining the Dual Influence of the Regional Size of the Immigrant Population on Derogation of Immigrants in Europe. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 49(2–3): 153173.
Semyonov M., Raijman R. and Gorodzeisky A. (2006) The Rise of Anti-Foreigner Sentiment in European Societies, 1988-2000. American Sociological Review 71(3): 426449.
Shayo M. (2009) A Model of Social Identity With an Application to Political Economy: Nation, Class, and Redistribution. American Political Science Review 103(2): 147174.
Senik C., Stichnoth H. and Van der Straeten K. (2009) Immigration and Natives’ Attitudes Towards the Welfare State: Evidence From the European Social Survey. Social Indicators Research 91(3): 345370.
Sniderman P. M., Hagendoorn L. and Prior M. (2004) Predisposing Factors and Situational Triggers: Exclusionary Reactions to Immigrant Minorities. American Political Science Review 98(1): 3549.
Soroka S., Johnston R. and Banting K. (2007) Ethnicity, Trust and the Welfare State. In Kay F. and Johnston R. (eds.), Social Capital, Diversity and the Welfare State. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 279–303.
Stein R. M., Post S. S. and Rinden A. L. (2000) Reconciling Context and Contact Effects on Racial Attitudes. Political Research Quarterly 53(2): 285303.
Stichnoth H. (2012) Does Immigration Weaken Natives’ Support for the Unemployed? Evidence from Germany. Public Choice 151(3–4): 631654.
Van der Waal J., Achterberg P., Houtman D., De Koster W. and Manevska K. (2010) ‘Some are More Equal Than Others’: Economic Egalitarianism and Welfare Chauvinism in the Netherlands. Journal of European Social Policy 20(4): 350363.
Van Der Waal J., De Koster W. and Van Oorschot W. (2013) Three Worlds of Welfare Chauvinism? How Welfare Regimes Affect Support for Distributing Welfare to Immigrants in Europe. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 15(2): 164181.
Van Oorschot W. (2000) Who Should Get What, and Why? On Deservingness Criteria and the Conditionality of Solidarity Among the Public. Policy & Politics 28(1): 3348.
Van Oorschot W. (2006) Making the Difference in Social Europe: Deservingness Perceptions Among Citizens of European Welfare States. Journal of European Social Policy 16(1): 2342.
Wagner U., Christ O., Pettigrew T. F., Stellmacher J. and Wolf C. (2006) Prejudice and Minority Proportion: Contact Instead of Threat Effects. Social Psychology Quarterly 69(4): 370380.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Public Policy
  • ISSN: 0143-814X
  • EISSN: 1469-7815
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-public-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Cappelen and Peters supplementary material 1
Cappelen and Peters supplementary material

 Word (44 KB)
44 KB

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 28 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 132 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 16th October 2017 - 19th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.